Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Candidate traits in elections: when good news for selection is bad news for accountability

  • Keith Schnakenberg (a1)
Abstract

We analyze a two-election political agency model with moral hazard and adverse selection in which candidates have observable traits such as job qualifications that help voters to imperfectly predict politicians' types. Candidate's traits can help voters select good types of politicians. However, selecting candidates with good traits can reduce accountability because the voter cannot commit to throw out politicians with good traits who produce bad outcomes. This result explains when and why voters may sometimes select candidates who they believe are less likely to be competent.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. E-mail: keith.schnakenberg@gmail.com
References
Hide All
Ashworth, S (2005) Reputational dynamics and political careers. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 21, 441466.
Ashworth, S and de Mesquita, EB (2014) Is voter competence good for voters?: Information, rationality, and democratic performance. The American Political Science Review 108, 565587.
Avis, E, Ferraz, C and Finan, F (2016) Do government audits reduce corruption? Estimating the impacts of exposing corrupt politicians. Technical report National Bureau of Economic Research.
Berganza, JC (2000) Two roles for elections: disciplining the incumbent and selecting a competent candidate. Public Choice 105, 165193.
Besley, T (2006) Principled Agents?: The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Carson, JL, Engstrom, EJ and Roberts, JM (2007) Candidate quality, the personal vote, and the incumbency advantage in congress. American Political Science Review 101, 289301.
Fearon, JD (1999) Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–97.
Hall, MG and Bonneau, CW (2006) Does quality matter? Challengers in state supreme court elections. American Journal of Political Science 50, 2033. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3694254.
Hirano, S and Snyder, JM (2014) Primary elections and the quality of elected officials. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9, 473500.
Kartik, N and Van Weelden, R (2018) Informative cheap talk in elections. The Review of Economic Studies.
Streb, MJ and Frederick, B (2009) Conditions for competition in low-information judicial elections: the case of intermediate appellate court elections. Political Research Quarterly 62, 523537.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed