Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-54cdcc668b-hs2vm Total loading time: 1.101 Render date: 2021-03-09T05:45:09.739Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

“Kill Them All—Old and Young, Girls and Women and Little Children” 1 : An Examination of the Organizational Choice of Targeting Civilians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

Abstract

What factors make it more likely that non-state organizations will target civilians as a political strategy? This study examines targeting civilians as a tactical and normative choice, and hypothesizes that the targeting of civilians (compared to the general use of violence) is a function of the ideological make-up of organizations, organization weakness and state repression. Other factors related to organizational capability will not have a differential impact on the likelihood that an organization will target civilians for violence. This article uses data from the Minorities at Risk Organizational Behavior database to examine these issues with respect to ethno-political organizations. It argues that the typical analytic focus on general violence obscures understanding of the factors that lead to targeting civilians. It finds that targeting civilians—while similar in some respects to the use of general violence—is different, particularly with respect to organizational ideology.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

1

Ezekiel 9:5–7.

*

Victor Asal is Associate Professor of Political Science, Rockefeller College, University at Albany, SUNY, 135 Western Ave, Albany, NY 12203 (email: vasal@albany.edu). Mitchell Brown is Associate Professor of Political Science, 7080 Haley Center, Auburn University, AL 36849 (email: brown11@auburn.edu). Marcus Schulzke is a Research Fellow at the School of Politics and International Studies, 13.14 Social Sciences Building, University of Leeds LS2 9JT (M.B.Schulzke@Leeds.ac.uk). Support for this research was provided by the Department of Homeland Security through the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect views of the Department of Homeland Security. The most recent version of this article was presented at the Third Annual Conference on Terrorism and Policy, sponsored by the Center for Global Collective Action at the University of Texas, Dallas, 20–21 May 2010. We would like to thank the reviewers of this manuscript for their helpful suggestions.

References

Alimi, Eitan. 2003. ‘The Effects of Opportunities on Insurgencies’. Terrorism and Political Violence 15(3):111138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Nickerson, David W.. 2009. ‘Who is Mobilized to Vote? A Re-Analysis of 11 Field Experiments’. American Journal of Political Science 53(1):116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arreguin-Toft, Ivan. 2001. ‘How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict’. International Security 26(1):93128.Google Scholar
Asal, Victor, Gill, Paul, Rethemeyer, R. Karl, and Horgan, John Forthcoming. ‘Killing Range: Explaining Lethality Variance Within a Terrorist Organization’. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 127.Google Scholar
Badey, Thomas J. 1998. ‘Defining International Terrorism: A Pragmatic Approach’. Terrorism & Political Violence 10(1):90107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergan, Daniel E., Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Panagopoulos, Costas. 2005. ‘Grassroots Mobilization and Voter Turnout in 2004’. The Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5):760777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Eli. 2009. Radical, Religious, and Violent: The New Economics of Terrorism. Boston: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieber, Florian. 2003. ‘Approaches to Political Violence and Terrorism in Former Yugoslavia’. Journal of Southern Europe & the Balkans 5(1):3951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, S. Brock, Hess, Gregory D., and Weerapana, Akila. 2004. ‘Economic Conditions and Terrorism’. European Journal of Political Economy 20(2):463478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Mia. 2003. ‘Ethnic Conflict, State Terror and Suicide Bombing in Sri Lanka’. Civil Wars 6(1):5484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Mia. 2005. Dying to Kill. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Borum, Randy. 2004. Psychology of Terrorism. Tampa: University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel. 1998. ‘The Logic of Ethnic Terrorism’. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 21(2):149169.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel. 2005. Deadly Connections: States that Sponsor Terrorism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Callaway, Rhonda, and Harrelson-Stephens, Julie. 2006. ‘Toward a Theory of Terrorism: Human Security as a Determinant of Terrorism’. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29(7):679702.Google Scholar
Carr, Caleb. 1997. ‘Terrorism as Warfare: The Lessons of Military History’. World Policy Journal 31:18.Google Scholar
Coady, Cecil A.J. 1985. ‘The Morality of Terrorism’. Philosophy 60(231):4769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, Cecil A.J.. 2004. ‘Terrorism, Morality, and Supreme Emergency’. Ethics 114(4):772789.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul. 2002. ‘Greed and Grievance in Civil Wars’. Working Paper. Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Hoeffler, Anke. 2001. ‘On Economic Causes of Civil War’. Oxford Economic Paper 50(4):563573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Hoeffler, Anke. 2004. Greed and Grievance in Civil Wars. World Bank 2001. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/research/conflict/papers/greedgrievance_23oct.pdf, accessed 20 June 2004.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Sambanis, Nicholas. 2002. ‘Understanding Civil War: A New Agenda’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(1):312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Martha. 1981. ‘The Causes of Terrorism’. Comparative Politics 13(4):379399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Audrey Kurth. 2009. How Terrorism Ends. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Darby, John. 2001. The Effects of Violence on Peace Processes. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella. 2006. Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DesRosiers, David. 2003. ‘The Team Against the Committee: Fighting Tyranny and Terrorism Without Losing our Liberal Soul’. Political Science Reviewer 32:5875.Google Scholar
Drake, C.J.M.. 1998. TerroristsTarget Selection . New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugan, Laura, and Chenoweth, Erica. 2012. ‘Moving Beyond Deterrence: The Effectiveness of Raising the Expected Utility of Abstaining from Terrorism in Israel’. American Sociological Review 77(4):597624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, Walter, and Sandler, Todd. 2000. ‘Is Transnational Terrorism Becoming More Threatening? A Time-Series Investigation’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44(3):307332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engene, Jan Oskar. 2004. Terrorism in Western Europe: Explaining the Trends Since 1950. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Eubank, Walter, and Weinberg, Leonard. 1994. ‘Does Democracy Encourage Terrorism?’. Terrorism & Political Violence 6(4):417435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, Walter, and Weinberg, Leonard. 2001. ‘Terrorism and Democracy: Perpetrators and Victims’. Terrorism & Political Violence 13(1):155164.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2003. ‘Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War’. American Political Science Review 97(1):7590.Google Scholar
Feldmann, Andreas E., and Perala, Maiju. 2004. ‘Reassessing the Causes of Nongovernmental Terrorism in Latin America’. Latin American Politics & Society 46(2):101132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. ‘Norms, Culture and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism’. International Organization 50:325348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52(4):887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 2001. ‘Toward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory’. Annual Review of Political Science 4(1):139187.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff. 2004. ‘What Must We Explain to Explain Terrorism’. Social Movement Studies 3(2):259262.Google Scholar
Gressang IV, Daniel S. 2001. ‘Audience and Message: Assessing Terrorist WMD Potential’. Terrorism & Political Violence 13(3):83106.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted. 1988. ‘Empirical Research on Political Terrorism: The State of the Art and How It Might be Improved’. In R. Slater and M. Stohl (eds), Current Perspectives on International Terrorism. 115154. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted. 2000. People vs. States. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Lawrence C., and Hamilton, James D.. 1983. ‘Dynamics of Terrorism’. International Studies Quarterly 27(1):3954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegre, Havard, Ellingsen, Tanja, Gates, Scott, and Gleditsch, Nils Peter. 2001. ‘Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992’. American Political Science Review 95(1):3348.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Christopher. 2000. ‘Patterns of American Terrorism 1955–1998: An Historical Perspective on Terrorism-Related Fatalities’. Terrorism & Political Violence 12(1):114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Bruce. 1998. Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Bruce. 1999. ‘Terrorism Trends and Prospects’. In W. O. Lesser, B. Hoffman, J. Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt and M. Zanini (eds), Countering the New Terrorism, 738. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Hofnung, Menachem. 1994. ‘States of Emergency and Ethnic Conflict in Liberal Democracies: Great Britain and Israel’. Terrorism & Political Violence 6(3):340365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, M., and Weinstein, J.M.. 2006. ‘Handling and Manhandling Civilians in Civil War’. American Political Science Review 100(3):429447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Paul K., and Allee, Todd L.. 2003. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2003. Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence, 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2004. ‘Is Religion the Problem?’. The Hedgehog Review, Spring 2133.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Smadar H. 2003. ‘The World Should Know What He Did to My Family’. The Washington Post, 18 May.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. 2004. ‘The Paradox of Terrorism in Civil War’. The Journal of Ethics 8(1):97138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kimball, Anessa L. 2006. ‘Alliance Formation and Conflict Initiation: The Missing Link’. Journal of Peace Research 43(4):371389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Alan B., and Maleckova, Jitka. 2002. Education, Poverty, Political Violence and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection? Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFree, G., and Ackerman, G.. 2009. ‘The Empirical Study of Terror: Social and Legal Research’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5(1):347374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFree, Gary, and Dugan, Laura. 2007. ‘Introducing the Global Terrorism Database’. Terrorism and Political Violence 19(2):181204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laqueur, Walter. 1999. The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Quan. 2005. ‘Does Democracy Promote or Reduce Transnational Terrorist Incidents’? Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(2):278297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Quan, and Schaub, Drew. 2004. ‘Economic Globalization and Transnational Terrorism: A Pooled Time-Series Analysis’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48(2):230258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lia, Brynjar, and Skjolberg, Katja. 2004a. Causes of Terrorism: An Expanded and Updated Review of the Literature. Kjeller, Norway: Norwegian Defense Research Establishment.Google Scholar
Lia, Brynjar, and Skjolberg, Katja. 2004b. ‘Why Terrorism Occurs: A Survey of Theories and Hypotheses on the Causes of Terrorism’. Journal of Conflict and Violence Research 6(1):121163.Google Scholar
Lynch, Dov. 2005. ‘The Enemy is at the Gate: Russia After Beslan’. International Affairs 81(1):141161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGinty, Roger. 2001. ‘Ethno-National Conflict and Hate Crime’. American Behavioral Scientist 45(4):639653.Google Scholar
Marighella, Carlos. 1971. ‘Manual of the Urban Guerrilla’. Survival 13(3):95100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, Gordan. 2003. ‘Terrorist Decision Making’. Annual Review of Political Science 6(1):473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minorities at Risk Organizational Behavior Project (MAROB). 2009. Minorities at Risk Organizational Behavior (MAROB) Code Book. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management.Google Scholar
Moscardno, Ughetta, Axia, Giovanna., Scrimin, Sara, and Capello, Fabia. 2007. ‘Narratives from Caregivers of Children Surviving the Terrorist Attack in Beslan: Issues of Health, Culture, and Resilience’. Social Science & Medicine 64(8):17761787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberschall, Anthony. 2004. ‘Explaining Terrorism: The Contribution of Collective Action Theory’. Sociological Theory 22(1):2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pape, Robert A. 2003. ‘The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism’. American Political Science Review 97(3):343361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piazza, James. 2006. ‘Rooted in Poverty? Terrorism, Poor Economic Development, and Social Cleavages’. Terrorism and Political Violence 18(1):159177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, Jerrold. 1998. ‘Terrorist Psycho-Logic: Terrorist Behavior as a Product of Psychological Forces’. In W. Reich (ed.), Origins of Terrorism. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Francisco O., and Soysal, Yasemin. 1997. ‘The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women’s Suffrage Rights...’. American Sociological Review 62(5):735745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M., and Norton, Daniel. 2005. ‘Greed, Grievance, and Mobilization in Civil Wars’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(3):319336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinares, Fernando. 1998. ‘Democratic Regimes, Internal Security Policy and the Threat of Terrorism’. Australian Journal of Politics & History 44(3):351371.Google Scholar
Ross, Jeffrey Ian. 1993. ‘Structural Causes of Oppositional Political Terrorism: Towards a Causal Model’. Journal of Peace Research 30(3):317329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1990. Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Cuenca, Ignacio, and de la Calle, Luis. 2009. ‘Domestic Terrorism: The Hidden Side of Political Violence’. Annual Review of Political Science 12:3149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Todd, and Enders, Walter. 2004. ‘An Economic Perspective on Transnational Terrorism’. European Journal of Political Economy 20(2):301316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Alex. 1992. ‘Terrorism and Democracy’. Terrorism & Political Violence 4(4):1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Alex. 2005. ‘Root Causes of Terrorism: Some Conceptual Notes, a Set of Indicators, and a Model’. Democracy and Security 1(2):127136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, Tanya Telfair. 2000. ‘The Identity Christian Movement: Ideology of Domestic Terrorism’. Journal of Black Studies 30(4):604623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silke, Andrew (ed.) 2004. Research on Terrorism. London: Frank Cass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Steven, and Benjamin, Daniel. 2001. ‘The Terror’. Survival 43(4):518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprinzak, Ehud. 1995. ‘Right-Wing Terrorism in a Comparative Perspective: The Case of Split Delegitimization’. Terrorism and Political Violence 7(1):1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprinzak, Ehud. 1999. Brother Against Brother: Violence and Extremism in Israeli Politics from Altalena to the Rabin Assassination. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Stedman, Stephen J. 1997. ‘Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes’. International Security 22(2):554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Jonathan. 2003. ‘Exploiting Democracy: The IRA’s Tactical Cease-Fire’. Review of International Affairs 2(3):159170.Google Scholar
Turk, Austin T. 2004. ‘Sociology of Terrorism’. Annual Review of Sociology 30(1):271286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Leonard B., Pedahzur, Ami, and Perliger, Arie. 2009. Political Parties and Terrorist Groups. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Leonard B., and Eubank, William L.. 1990. ‘Political Parties and the Formation of Terrorist Groups’. Terrorism and Political Violence 2(2):125144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Leonard B., and Eubank, William L.. 1998. ‘Terrorism and Democracy: What Recent Events Disclose’. Terrorism & Political Violence 10(1):108118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Jeremy. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Paul. 2001. Terrorism Versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Windsor, Jennifer L. 2003. ‘Promoting Democratization Can Combat Terrorism’. The Washington Quarterly 26(3):4358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Ekkart. 1987. ‘Political Violence and Other Strategies of Opposition Movements: A Look at Some Recent Evidence’. Journal of International Affairs 40(2):325352.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 265 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 9th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

“Kill Them All—Old and Young, Girls and Women and Little Children” 1 : An Examination of the Organizational Choice of Targeting Civilians
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

“Kill Them All—Old and Young, Girls and Women and Little Children” 1 : An Examination of the Organizational Choice of Targeting Civilians
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

“Kill Them All—Old and Young, Girls and Women and Little Children” 1 : An Examination of the Organizational Choice of Targeting Civilians
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *