Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-55wx7 Total loading time: 0.341 Render date: 2021-02-28T04:32:26.391Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Inequality, Aspirations, and Social Comparisons*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

Abstract

We develop a model of adaptive learning with social comparisons. Actors are more likely to choose actions that recently yielded satisfactory payoffs; satisfaction is evaluated relative to an aspiration level that reflects previous payoffs and possibly other players’ payoffs. This captures the phenomenon of social comparison via reference groups. We show that if agents compare themselves to those who are receiving higher payoffs then in stable outcomes all payoffs must be equal. If, however, agents’ aspirations are driven by less ambitious social comparisons then very unequal distributions can be stable. We apply our general results to collective action problems in socio-political hierarchies and derive conditions for stable exploitation. Finally, we develop a computational model, which shows that increases in payoff inequality make outcomes less stable.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

Jonathan Bendor, Walter and Elise Haas Professor of Political Economics and Organizations, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 (jonathan.bendor@stanford.edu). Daniel Diermeier, Dean, Harris School of Public Policy and Emmett, Dedmon Professor of Public Administration, 1155 E. 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 (ddiermeier@uchicago.edu). Michael M. Ting, Department of Political Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 (mmt2033@columbia.edu). An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. The authors thank Michael Harrison and David Kreps for helpful discussions about non-stationary Markov chains, and Greg Martin and Holke Brammer for their research assistance. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.47

References

Anily, Shoshana, and Federgruen, Awi. 1987. ‘Ergodicity in Parametric Nonstationary Markov Chains’. Operations Research 35(6):867874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan, Diermeier, Daniel, and Ting, Michael. 2003. ‘A Behavioral Model of Turnout’. American Political Science Review 97(2):261280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan, Diermeier, Daniel, and Ting, Michael. 2007a. ‘Comment: Adaptive Models in Sociology and the Problem of Empirical Content’. American Journal of Sociology 112(5):15341545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan, Diermeier, Daniel, and Ting, Michael. 2007b. ‘Aspirations, Reference Groups, and Collective Action’. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30–September 2, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan, Diermeier, Daniel, Siegel, David, and Ting, Michael. 2011. A Behavioral Theory of Elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan, and Mookherjee, Dilip. 1990. ‘Norms, Third-Party Sanctions, and Cooperation’. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6(1):3363.Google Scholar
Blanton, Hart, Buunk, Bram P., Gibbons, Frederick X., and Kuyper, Hans. 1999. ‘When Better-Than-Others Compare Upward: Choice of Comparison and Comparative Evaluation as Independent Predictors of Academic Performance’. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 76(3):420430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Robert, and Mosteller, Frederick. 1955. Stochastic Models for Learning. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, Bram, Collins, Rebecca, Taylor, Shelley, Van Yperen, Nico, and Dakof, Gayle. 1990. ‘The Affective Consequences of Social Comparison: Either Direction Has its Ups and Downs’. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 59(6):12381249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caporale, Guglielmo M., Georgellis, Yannis, Tsitsianis, Nicholas, and Yin, Ya Ping. 2009. ‘Income and Happiness Across Europe: Do Reference Values Matter?Journal of Economic Psychology 30(1):4251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andrew E., Frijters, Paul, and Shields, Michael A.. 2008. ‘Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles’. Journal of Economic Literature 46(1):95144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Rebecca. 1996. ‘For Better or Worse: The Impact of Upward Social Comparison on Social-Evaluations’. Psychological Bulletin 119(1):5169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, John. 1973. ‘A Stochastic Learning Model of Economic Behavior’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(2):239266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Zhiwei, Zhai, Jian, and Liu, Xuan. 2009. ‘The Efficiency of Observability and Mutual Linkage’. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 9(1):Article 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, James C. 1962. ‘Toward a Theory of Revolution’. American Sociological Review 27(1):519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltantawy, Nahed, and Wiest, Julie B.. 2011. ‘The Arab Spring—Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory’. International Journal of Communication 5:12071224.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1954. ‘A Theory of Social Comparison Processes’. Human Relations 1:117140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliessbach, Klaus, Weber, Bernd, Trautner, Peter, Dohmen, Thomas, Sunde, Uwe, Elger, Christian E., and Falk, Armin. 2007. ‘Social Comparison Affects Reward-Related Brain Activity in the Human Ventral Striatum’. Science 318:13051380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerrard, Meg, Gibbons, Frederick X., Lane, David J., and Stock, Michelle L.. 2005. ‘Smoking Cessation: Social Comparison Level Predicts Success for Adult Smokers’. Health Psychology 24(6):623629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurney, Joan N., and Tierney, Kathleen J.. 1982. ‘Relative Deprivation and Social Movements: A Critical Look at Twenty Years of Theory and Research’. The Sociological Quarterly 23(1):3347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted R. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Helgeson, Vicki S., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 1993. ‘Social Comparisons and Adjustment Among Cardiac Patients’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23(15):11711195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Matthew O. 2008. Social and Economic Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kandori, Michiko. 1992. ‘Social Norms and Community Enforcement’. Review of Economic Studies 59(1):6380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Niklas, Dellgran, Peter, Klingander, Birgitta, and Garling, Tommy. 2004. ‘Household Consumption: Influences of Aspiration Level, Social Comparison, and Money Management’. Journal of Economic Psychology 25(6):753769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, Mark A., and Peress, Michael. 2012. ‘Benchmarking Across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison’. American Political Science Review 106(3):661684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazer, David, Rubineau, Brian, Chetkovich, Carol, Katz, Nancy, and Neblo, Michael. 2010. ‘The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes’. Political Communication 27(3):248274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttmer, Erzo F.P. 2005. ‘Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(3):9631002.Google Scholar
Macy, Michael, and Flache, Andreas. 2002. ‘Learning Dynamics in Social Dilemmas’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:72297236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, Mancur. [1965] 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runciman, Walter G. 1966. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sherif, M. 1936. The Psychology of Social Norms. Oxford, UK: Harper.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2011. ‘Of the 1%, by the 1%, For the 1%’. Vanity Fair, May, p. 126, available at http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105.Google Scholar
Suls, Jerry, Marco, Christine A., and Tobin, Sheldon. 1991. ‘The Role of Temporal Comparison, Social Comparison, and Direct Appraisal in the Elderly’s Self-Evaluations of Health’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21(14):11251144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Shelley, and Lobel, Marci. 1989. ‘Social Comparison Activity Under Threat: Downward Evaluation and Upward Contacts’. Psychological Review 96(4):569575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilly, Charles. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van der Zee, Karen, Buunk, Bram, and Sanderman, Bram. 1998. ‘Neuroticism and Reactions to Social Comparison Information Among Cancer Patients’. Journal of Personality 66(2):175194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veenhoven, Ruut. 1991. ‘Is Happiness Relative?’. Social Indicators Research 24(1):134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, Thomas. 1981. ‘Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology’. Psychological Bulletin 90(2):245271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bendor et al. Dataset

Link

Bendor supplementary material

Bendor supplementary material 1

File 45 KB

Bendor supplementary material

Appendix

PDF 245 KB

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 22
Total number of PDF views: 271 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Inequality, Aspirations, and Social Comparisons*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Inequality, Aspirations, and Social Comparisons*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Inequality, Aspirations, and Social Comparisons*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *