Skip to main content Accessibility help

Statistical Analysis of Endorsement Experiments: Measuring Support for Militant Groups in Pakistan

  • Will Bullock (a1), Kosuke Imai (a1) and Jacob N. Shapiro (a1)


Political scientists have long been interested in citizens' support level for such actors as ethnic minorities, militant groups, and authoritarian regimes. Attempts to use direct questioning in surveys, however, have largely yielded unreliable measures of these attitudes as they are contaminated by social desirability bias and high nonresponse rates. In this paper, we develop a statistical methodology to analyze endorsement experiments, which recently have been proposed as a possible solution to this measurement problem. The commonly used statistical methods are problematic because they cannot properly combine responses across multiple policy questions, the design feature of a typical endorsement experiment. We overcome this limitation by using item response theory to estimate support levels on the same scale as the ideal points of respondents. We also show how to extend our model to incorporate a hierarchical structure of data in order to uncover spatial variation of support while recouping the loss of statistical efficiency due to indirect questioning. We illustrate the proposed methodology by applying it to measure political support for Islamist militant groups in Pakistan. Simulation studies suggest that the proposed Bayesian model yields estimates with reasonable levels of bias and statistical power. Finally, we offer several practical suggestions for improving the design and analysis of endorsement experiments.


Corresponding author


Hide All

Authors' note: All of the code necessary to reproduce the results in this paper can be downloaded from the Dataverse as Bullock, Imai, and Shapiro (2011). A previous version of this paper was circulated as “Measuring Political Support and Issue Ownership Using Endorsement Experiments, with Application to the Militant Groups in Pakistan.”



Hide All
Bafumi, J., Gelman, A., Park, D. K., and Kaplan, N. 2005. Practical issues in implementing and understanding Bayesian ideal point estimation. Political Analysis 13: 171–87.
Bafumi, J., and Herron, M. 2010. Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of American voters and their members in Congress. American Political Science Review 104(3): 519–42.
Blair, G., Fair, C. C., Malhotra, N., and Shapiro, J. N. 2011. Poverty and support for militant politics: Evidence from Pakistan. SSRN Working Paper.
Blair, G., and Imai, K. 2010. Statistical analysis of list experiments. Working paper.
Bullock, W., Imai, K., and Shapiro, J. N. 2011. Replication data for: Statistical analysis of endorsement experiments: Measuring support for militant groups in Pakistan. hdl:1902.1/14840. The Dataverse Network.
Clinton, J., Jackman, S., and Rivers, D. 2004. The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review 98: 355–70.
Clinton, J. D., and Lewis, D. E. 2008. Expert opinion, agency characteristics, and agency preferences. Political Analysis 16: 320.
Cohen, G. L. 2003. Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 808–22.
Fair, C. C., Malhotra, N., and Shapiro, J. N. 2009. The roots of militancy: Explaining support for political violence in Pakistan. Working paper. Princeton University.
Gelman, A., and Hill, J. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gelman, A., and Rubin, D. B. 1992. Inference from iterative simulations using multiple sequences (with discussion). Statistical Science 7: 457–72.
Gingerich, D. W. 2010. Understanding off-the-books politics: Conducting inference on the determinants of sensitive behavior with randomized response surveys. Political Analysis 18: 349–80.
Heckman, J. J., and Snyder, J. M. 1997. Linear probability models of the demand for attributes with an empirical application to estimating the preferences of legislators. RAND Journal of Economics 28: 142–89.
Holland, P. W. 1986. Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 945–60.
Imai, K. 2011. Multivariate regression analysis for the item count technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106: 407–16.
Kam, C. D. 2005. Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior 27: 163–82.
Lax, J. R., and Phillips, J. H. 2009. How should we estimate public opinion in the states? American Journal of Political Science 53: 107–21.
Muraki, E. 1992. A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement 16: 159–76.
Nicholson, S. P., Forthcoming 2011. Dominating cues and the limits of elite influence. Journal of Politics.
Pakistan Federal Bureau of Statistics. 2008. Labour force survey 2007-8. Technical report.
Park, D. K., Gelman, A., and Bafumi, J. 2004. Bayesian multilevel estimation with poststratification: State-level estimates from national polls. Political Analysis 12: 375–85.
Peress, M., and Spirling, A. 2010. Scaling the critics: Uncovering the latent dimensions of movie criticism with an item response approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105: 7183.
Plummer, M. 2009. JAGS: Just Another Gibbs Sampler.
Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 1985. A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29: 357–84.
Rivers, D. 2003. Identification of multidimensional spatial voting models. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, Stanford University.
Shapiro, J. N., and Fair, C. C. 2010. Why support Islamist militancy? Evidence from Pakistan. International Security 34: 79118.
Sniderman, P. M., and Piazza, T. 1993. The Scar of Race. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
United States Agency for International Development. 2009. Development assistance and counter-extremism: A guide to programming. Technical report.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed