Albert, Reka, and Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics
Aldisert, Rugero J.
1990. Precedent: What it is and what it isn't; when do we kiss it and when do we kill it?
Pepperdine Law Review
Allen, Carleton Kemp. 1964. Law in the making. 7th ed.
New York: Clarendon Press.
Biskupic, Joan, and Witt, Elder. 1997. Congressional quarterly's guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. 3rd ed.
Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Bonacich, Phillip. 1972. Factoring and weighing approaches to clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology
Bonacich, Phillip. 1987. Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology
Caldeira, Gregory A.
1985. The transmission of legal precedent: A study of state Supreme Courts. American Political Science Review
Carmines, Edward G., and Zeller, Richard A.
1979. Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Chandler, Seth J.
2005. The network structure of Supreme Court jurisprudence. In public law and legal Theory series. Report 2005-W-01, 26. Houston, TX: University of Houston Law Center.
Cross, Frank B., Smith, Thomas A., and Tomarchio, Antonio. 2006. Determinants of cohesion in the supreme court's network of precedents. San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-67. Social Science Research Network: http://ssrn.com/abstract=924110 (accessed May 15, 2007).
Douglas, William O.
1979 . Stare decisis. In Courts, judges, and politics: An introduction to the judicial process, ed. Murphy, Walter F. and Herman Pritchett, C., 66–71. New York: Random House.
Dworkin, Ronald M.
1986. Law's empire. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A.
2000. Measuring issue salience. American Journal of Political Science
Fowler, James H.
2006. Connecting the Congress: A study of cosponsorship networks. Political Analysis
Freeman, Linton C.
1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks
Friedman, Lawrence M., Kagan, Robert A., Cartwright, Bliss, and Wheeler, Stanton. 1981. State Supreme Courts: A century of style and citation. Stanford Law Review
Gibson, James L.
1997. United States Supreme Court judicial database, phase II: 1953-1993. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Hall, Kermit L.
1999. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hansford, Thomas G., and Spriggs, James F. II. 2006. The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hellman, Arthur D.
1983. Error correction, lawmaking, and the Supreme Court's exercise of discretionary review. University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr.
1991 . The common law. New York: Dover Publications.
Johnson, Charles A.
1987. Law, politics, and judicial decision making: Lower federal court uses of Supreme Court decisions. Law and Society Review
Jones, Harry W.
1975. Our uncommon common law. Tennessee Law Review
Kempin, Frederick G.
1959. Precedent and stare decisis: The critical years, 1800 to 1850. American Journal of Legal History
Klein, David E.
2002. Making law in the United States Courts of Appeals. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kleinberg, Jon M.
1999. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery
Kosma, Montgomery N.
1998. Measuring the influence of Supreme Court justices. Journal of Legal Studies
Landes, William M., Lessig, Lawrence, and Solimine, Michael E.
1998. Judicial influence: A citation analysis of federal courts of appeals judges. Journal of Legal Studies
Landes, William M., and Posner, Richard A.
1976. Legal precedent: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Law and Economics
Levi, Edward H.
1949. An introduction to legal reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lindquist, Stefanie A., and Cross, Frank B.
2005. Empirically testing Dworkin's chain novel theory: Studying the path of precedent. New York University Law Review
Maltz, Earl. 1988. The nature of precedent. North Carolina Law Review
McIntosh, Wayne, Cousins, Ken, Rose, James, Simon, Steve, Evans, Mike, Karnes, Kimberly, McTague, John, and Pearson-Merkowitz, Shanna. 2005. Using information technology to examine the communication of precedent: Initial findings and lessons from the CITE-IT project. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Assocation, Oakland, CA.
Merryman, John Henry. 1954. The authority of authority: What the California Supreme Court cited in 1950. Stanford Law Review
Merryman, John Henry. 1977. Toward a theory of citations: An empirical study of the citation practice of the California Supreme Court in 1950, 1960, and 1970. Southern California Law Review
Post, David G., and Eisen, Michael B.
2000. How long is the coastline of the law? Thoughts on the fractal nature of legal systems. Journal of Legal Studies
Powell, Lewis F. Jr.
1990. Stare decisis and judicial restraint. Washington and Lee Law Review
Proctor, C. H., and Loomis, C. P.
1951. Analysis of sociometric data. In Research methods in social relations, ed. Holland, P.W. and Leinhardt, S., 561–86. New York: Dryden Press.
Rapp, Cynthia. 2004. A collection of in chambers opinions by the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. Washington, DC: Green Bag Press.
1998. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B
Richards, Mark J., and Kritzer, Herbert M.
2002. Jurisprudential regimes in Supreme Court decision making. American Political Science Review
Schauer, Frederick. 1987. Precedent. Stanford Law Review
Sirico, Louis J. Jr.
2000. The citing of law reviews by the Supreme Court, 1971-1999. Indiana Law Journal
Spriggs, James F. II, and Hansford, Thomas G.
2000. Measuring legal change: The reliability and validity of Shepard's citations. Political Research Quarterly
Wahlbeck, Paul J.
1998. The development of a legal rule: The federal common law of public nuisance. Law & Society Review
Wald, Patricia M.
1995. The rhetoric and the results of rhetoric: Judicial writings. University of Chicago Law Review
Wasby, Stephen L., Peterson, Steven, Schubert, James, and Schubert, Glendon. 1992. The per curiam opinion: Its nature and functions. Judicature
Wasserman, Stanley, and Faust, Katherine. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.