Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Method to Audit the Assignment of Registered Voters to Districts and Precincts

  • Brian Amos (a1) and Michael P. McDonald (a2)

Abstract

Electoral boundaries are an integral part of election administration. District boundaries delineate which legislative election voters are eligible to participate in, and precinct boundaries identify, in many localities, where voters cast in-person ballots on Election Day. Election officials are tasked with resolving a tremendously large number of intersections of registered voters with overlapping electoral boundaries. Any large-scale data project is susceptible to errors, and this task is no exception. In two recent close elections, these errors were consequential to the outcome. To address this problem, we describe a method to audit the assignment of registered voters to districts. We apply the methodology to Florida’s voter registration file to identify thousands of registered voters assigned to the wrong state House district, many of which local election officials have verified and rectified. We discuss how election officials can best use this technique to detect registered voters assigned to the wrong electoral boundary.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A Method to Audit the Assignment of Registered Voters to Districts and Precincts
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A Method to Audit the Assignment of Registered Voters to Districts and Precincts
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A Method to Audit the Assignment of Registered Voters to Districts and Precincts
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All

Authors’ note: The replication materials for this paper can be found at Amos (2019).

Contributing Editor: Jeff Gill

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Altman, M., and McDonald, M. P.. 2003. “Replication with Attention to Numerical Accuracy.” Political Analysis 11(3):302307.
Amos, B.2019. “Replication Data for: A Method to Audit the Assignment of Registered Voters to Districts and Precincts.” https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Y18MK5, Harvard Dataverse, V1.
Amos, B., Smith, D., and Ste. Claire, C.. 2017. “Reprecincting and Voting Behavior.” Political Behavior 39(1):133156.
Beard, C. A. 1909. “The Ballot’s Burden.” Political Science Quarterly 24(4):589614.
Brady, H., and McNulty, J. E.. 2011. “Turning Out to Vote: The Costs of Finding and Getting to the Polling Place.” American Political Science Review 105(1):115134.
Bullock, C. S. 2010. Redistricting: The Most Political Activity in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Cayo, M. R., and Talbot, T. O.. 2003. “Positional Error in Automated Geocoding of Residential Addresses.” International Journal of Health Geographics 2:10.
Dyck, J. J., and Gimpel, J. G.. 2005. “Distance, Turnout, and the Convenience of Voting.” Social Science Quarterly 86(3):531548.
Gimpel, J. G., Dyck, J. J., and Shaw, D. R.. 2006. “Location, Knowledge and Time Pressures in the Spatial Structure of Convenience Voting.” Electoral Studies 25(1):3558.
Haspel, M. H., and Knotts, G.. 2005. “Location, Location, Location: Precinct Placement and the Costs of Voting.” The Journal of Politics 67(2):560573.
Hayes, D., and McKee, S. C.. 2009. “The Participatory Effects of Redistricting.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4):10061023.
Herrnson, P. S., Hanmer, M. J., and Niemi, R. G.. 2012. “The Impact of Ballot Type on Voter Errors.” American Journal of Political Science 56(3):716730.
Imai, K., and Khanna, K.. 2016. “Improving Ecological Inference by Predicting Individual Ethnicity from Voter Registration Records.” Political Analysis 24(2):263272.
Krieger, N., Waterman, P., Lemieux, K., Zieler, S., and Hogan, J.. 2001. “Wrong Side of the Tracks? Evaluating the Accuracy of Geocoding in Public Health Research.” American Journal of Public Health 91(7):11141116.
Krieger, N., Waterman, P. D., Chen, J. Y., Soobader, M.-J., and Subramanian, S. V.. 2003. “Monitoring Socioeconomic Inequalities in Sexually Transmitted Infections, Tuberculosis, and Violence: Geocoding and Choice of Area-Based Socioeconomic Measures—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US).” Public Health Reports 118(May–June):240260.
Mellnik, T., Fischer-Baum, R., and Soffen, K.. 2018. “Thousands of Virginians May Have Voted in the Wrong State House Districts.” Washington Post, January 9, 2018. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/local/virginia-wrong-districts/.
New York Consolidated Laws. 2012. Section 121.
Ortiz, E.2018. “Native Americans Fighting Back Against North Dakota Voter ID Law.” NBC News. Oct. 30. 2018. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/native-americans-fighting-back-against-north-dakota-voter-id-law-n926326.
Purcell, J.2018. “Some Habersham County Voters Were Assigned to Wrong State House Districts.” Now Habersham, June 23, 2018. https://nowhabersham.com/some-habersham-county-voters-were-assigned-to-wrong-state-house-districts/.
United States Census Bureau. 2017. 2017 TIGER/Line Shapefiles. Accessed July 12, 2018. https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/geo/shapefiles/index.php.
United States Census Bureau. n.d. Tracts and Block Numbering Areas. Accessed July 10, 2018. https://www.census.gov/history/www/programs/geography/tracts_and_block_numbering_areas.html.
Virginia State Board of Elections. 2017. Agenda, November 27, 2017. http://townhall.virginia.gov/L/GetFile.cfm?File=C:\TownHall\docroot\\meeting\151\26912\Agenda_SBE_new_v1.pdf.
Ward, M. H., Nuckols, J. R., Giglierano, J., Bonner, M. R., Wolter, C., Airola, M., Mix, W., Colt, J. S., and Hartge, P.. 2005. “Positional Accuracy of Two Methods of Geocoding.” Epidemiology 16(4):542547.
Weiner, R.2018. “Appeals Court Won’t Block Republican from House of Delegates over Ballot Mixup.” Washington Post, January 10, 2018. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/appeals-court-wont-block-republican-from-house-of-delegates-over-ballot-mixup/2018/01/10/f2ae472e-f55a-11e7-a9e3-ab18ce41436a_story.html.
Welte, J. W., Wieczorek, W. F., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M.-C., and Hoffman, J. H.. 2004. “The Relationship of Ecological and Geographic Factors to Gambling Behavior and Pathology.” Journal of Gambling Studies 20(4):405423.
Whitsel, E. A., Rose, K. M., Wood, J. L., Henley, A. C., Liao, D., and Heiss, G.. 2004. “Accuracy and Repeatability of Commercial Geocoding.” American Journal of Epidemiology 160(10):10231029.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

Keywords

A Method to Audit the Assignment of Registered Voters to Districts and Precincts

  • Brian Amos (a1) and Michael P. McDonald (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.