Skip to main content Accessibility help

A Fast, Easy, and Efficient Estimator for Multiparty Electoral Data

  • James Honaker (a1), Jonathan N. Katz (a2) and Gary King (a3)


Katz and King have previously developed a model for predicting or explaining aggregate electoral results in multiparty democracies. Their model is, in principle, analogous to what least-squares regression provides American political researchers in that two-party system. Katz and King applied their model to three-party elections in England and revealed a variety of new features of incumbency advantage and sources of party support. Although the mathematics of their statistical model covers any number of political parties, it is computationally demanding, and hence slow and numerically imprecise, with more than three parties. In this paper we produce an approximate method that works in practice with many parties without making too many theoretical compromises. Our approach is to treat the problem as one of missing data. This allows us to use a modification of the fast EMis algorithm of King, Honaker, Joseph, and Scheve and to provide easy-to-use software, while retaining the attractive features of the Katz and King model, such as the t distribution and explicit models for uncontested seats.



Hide All
Aitchison, J. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. London: Chapman and Hall.
Beale, E. M. L., and Little, R. J. A. 1975. “Missing Data in Multivariate Analysis.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 37:129145.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. 1977. “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm (with Discussion).” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39:138.
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1994. “A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans.” American Journal of Political Science 38(2): 514554.
Gibson, John, and Cielecka, Anna. 1995. “Economic Influences on the Political Support for Market Reform in Post-communist Transitions: Some Evidence from the 1993 Polish Parliamentary Elections.” Europe-Asia Studies 47(5): 765785.
Honaker, James, Joseph, Gary King, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2000. Amelia: A Program for Missing Data (Gauss Version). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Katz, Jonathan, and King, Gary. 1999. “A Statistical Model for Multiparty Electoral Data.” American Political Science Review 93(1): 1532.
King, Gary, Honaker, Anne Joseph, James, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95(1): 4969.
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analysis: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44:341355.
Little, Roderick J.A., and Rubin, Donald. 1987. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley.
Liu, Chuanhai. 1994. Statistical Analysis Using the Multivariatet Distribution . Dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Liu, Chuanhai, and Rubin, Donald. 1994. “A Simple Extension to EM and ECM with Faster Monotone Convergence.” Biometrika 81:633648.
Schafer, Joseph L. 1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York: Chapman and Hall.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Honaker et al. supplementary material
Supplementary Material

 Unknown (395 KB)
395 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed