Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Exploring the role of trust in health risk communication in Nunavik, Canada

  • Amanda D. Boyd (a1), Chris M. Furgal (a2), Alyssa M. Mayeda (a1), Cindy G. Jardine (a3) and S. Michelle Driedger (a4)...

Abstract

Communicating about health risks in the Arctic can be challenging. Numerous factors can hinder or promote effective communication. One of the most important components in effective communication is trust in an information source. This is particularly true when a risk is unfamiliar or complex because the public must rely on expert assessment rather than personal evaluation of the risk. A total of 112 Inuit residents from Nunavik, Canada, were interviewed to better understand the factors that influence trust in individuals or organisations. Results indicate that there are six primary factors that influence trust in an information source. These factors include: (1) whether the information source is a friend or family member; (2) past performance of the individual or organisation; (3) the general disposition of the audience member (that is, he or she believes that most people are trustworthy); (4) the openness or candidness of the source; (5) value similarity (referring to the perceived correspondence in values between the audience member and communicator); and (6) the credibility of the source. The results of this study can help determine who or what agencies should provide messages about health risks in the Arctic. It also provides insight about effective strategies for engendering trust among Arctic residents.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Amanda D. Boyd, Email: amanda.boyd@wsu.edu

References

Hide All
AMAP (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program). (2015). Human health in the Arctic. Oslo: AMAP.
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods and Research, 10(2), 141163.
Covello, V. T., Slovic, P., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (1986). Risk communication: A review of the literature. Emmitsburg, MD: National Emergency Training Center.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Earle, T., & Siegrist, M. (2008). Trust, confidence and cooperation model: a framework for understanding the relation between trust and risk perception. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 8(1–2), 1729.
Earle, T. C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2010). Trust, risk perception and the TCC model of cooperation. Trust in risk management: Uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind, OI, 149. doi: 10.4324/9781849773461.
Furgal, C., & Seguin, J. (2006). Climate change, health, and vulnerability in Canadian northern Aboriginal communities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(12), 19641970.
Furgal, C., Boyd, A. D., & Chan, L. (2014). Assessment of contaminant and dietary nutrient interactions in the Inuit Health Survey: Nunavut, Nunatsiavut and Inuvialuit – part 1: Risk perception and message evaluation study (QS-8667-010-EE-A1, 1-12). Ottawa, Ontario: Northern Contaminants Program, Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada.
Greenberg, M. R. (2014). Energy policy and research: The underappreciation of trust. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 152160.
Jardine, C. G., Banfield, L., Driedger, S. M., & Furgal, C. M. (2013). Risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: A case study of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 72(1), 21184.
LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (2010). Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Lundgren, R. E., & McMakin, A. H. (2013). Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety and health risks. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T., & McCallum, D. B. (1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17(1), 4354.
Parkinson, A. J. (2013). The Arctic human health initiative: a legacy of the International Polar Year 2007–2009. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 72(1), 21655. doi 10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21655.
Provencher, J., Baesemann, J., Carlson, J., Badhe, R., Bellman, J., Hik, D., … Zicus, S. (2011). Polar research education, outreach and communication during the fourth IPY: How the 2007–2008 International Polar Year has contributed to the future of education, outreach and communication. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU).
Renn, O., & Levine, D. (1991). Credibility and trust in risk communication. Communicating risks to the public: International perspectives, 4, 175218.
Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20(3), 353362.
Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20(5), 713720.
Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13(6), 675682.
Statistics Canada. (2013). Inuit: fact sheet for Nunavik. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-656-x/89-656-x2016016-eng.htm (accessed December 2017).
Statistics Canada. (2017). Census Profile, 2016 Census. Catalogue no. 98-316-X2016001. Available from: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm (accessed 13 March 2019).
Suter, W. (2012). Introduction to educational research: A critical thinking approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed