Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Article contents

Drones on ice: an assessment of the legal implications of the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in scientific research and by the tourist industry in Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2017

David Leary
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway NSW 2007, Australia (david.leary@uts.edu.au)
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), also known as drones, are used in scientific research and a diverse range of other applications across the globe. They are also being used increasingly for scientific research in Antarctica and to a lesser extent by tourists visiting the world's last great frontier tourist destination. Their use in scientific research in Antarctica offers many benefits to science and if used responsibly may be less invasive than other research techniques, offering a rich source of new scientific data. For tourists, UAVs also offer unique aerial photographic perspectives on Antarctica — the ultimate holiday snap shot. Concerns have been raised about the safety of drone use in the harsh and unpredictable Antarctic conditions, as well as possible environmental impacts. This paper considers these issues and the emerging regulatory response to drone use in Antarctica focusing on the Antarctic Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator's Handbook, which provides guidelines to national Antarctic programmes on the use of UAVs in the Antarctic Treaty area, and the temporary ban on use of drones by tourists imposed by the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO). Both measures arguably constitute a good first response to this emerging issue, although more still needs to be done.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Anderson, K. & Gaston, K. (2013). Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 11, 138146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antarctic Treaty. (1959). Adopted 1 December 1959. 402 U.N.T.S.; entered into force 23 June 1961. Retrieved from http://www.ats.aq/documents/keydocs/vol_1/vol1_2_AT_Antarctic_Treaty_e.pdf Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). (2004). XXVI – Resolution 2 – Guidelines for the operation of aircraft near concentrations of birds in Antarctica. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). (2012). The crash and rescue of Chinese Ka-32 helicopter. ATCM XXXV Information Paper 015. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). (2014). UAVs and their possible environmental impacts. ATCM XXXVII Working Paper 005. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). (2015a). Amery Ice Shelf helicopter incident. ATCM XXXVII Information Paper 075. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). (2015b). UAV remote sensing of environmental changes on King George Island (South Shetland Islands): preliminary information on the results of the first field season 2014/2015. ATCM XVIII Information Paper 077. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). (2015c). South Africa's use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) in Antarctica. ATCM XVIII Information Paper 080. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). (2015d). A risk-based approach to safe operations of unmanned aircraft systems in the United States Antarctic Program (USAP). ATCM XXXVIII Information Paper 082. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). (2015e). Guidance on unmanned aerial system (UAS) use in Antarctica developed for applications to scientific studies on penguins and seals. ATCM XXXVIII Information Paper 083. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). (2015f). Final report of the thirty-eighth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Sofia, Bulgaria 1–10 June 2015 (Volume I). Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). (2016). Operación de UAV/RPAS en la Antártida: normativa aplicada por España. ATCM XXXIX Information Paper 028. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
Australian Antarctic Division. (2015). Aurora Australis uses drone technology to navigate sea ice. Kingston, TAS: Australian Antarctic Division. Retrieved from http://www.antarctica.gov.au/news/2015/aurora-australis-uses-drone-technology-to-navigate-sea-ice Google Scholar
Bandeira, L., Branco, J., Viera, G. & Pin, P. (2015). UAV-based mapping of Barton Peninsula (King George Island, Antarctica) (p. 17). Paper presented at the V Iberian Conference of the International Permafrost Association, Valladolid, Spain. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282650162_UAV-based_mapping_of_Barton_Peninsula_King_George_Island_Antarctica Google Scholar
Bastmeijer, K. (2009). Protecting polar wilderness: just a western philosophical idea or a useful concept for regulating human activities in the polar regions. Yearbook of Polar Law, 1, 7399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brears, R. (2011). Using unmanned aerial vehicles in Antarctica. Christchurch: Gateway Antarctica, University of Canterbury Retrieved from http://www.anta.canterbury.ac.nz/documents/PCAS_13/PCAS_13_Brears%20project.pdf Google Scholar
Casey, B. (2015). ICAO panel will recommend first UAV standards in 2018. AIN Online. Retrieved from http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/aerospace/2015-01-06/icao-panel-will-recommend-first-uav-standards-2018 Google Scholar
Cassano, J. (2010). Observations of Antarctic polynya. EOS-Transactions American Geophysical Union, 91, 245246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEP (Committee for Environmental Protection). (2015). CEP XVIII annotated agenda. Retrieved from www.ats.aq/documents/ATCM38/att/ATCM38_att104_e.doc Google Scholar
CEP (Committee for Environmental Protection). (2016a). UAV and wildlife minimum distances. ATCM XXXIX Working Paper 001. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
CEP (Committee for Environmental Protection). (2016b). CEP XXXIX 2016 report. Final report of the thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Santiago, Chile 23 May - 11 June 2016 (Volume I). Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
Colomina, I. & Molina, P. (2014). Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: a review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 92, 7997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COMNAP (Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs). (2015). UAV use in Antarctica: risks and benefits. ATCM XXXVIII Working Paper 022. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
COMNAP (Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs). (2016). The COMNAP Unmanned Aerial Systems-Working Group (UAS-WG). ATCM XXXIX Working Paper 014. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
Convention on International Civil Aviation of 7 December 1944 (15 U.N.T.S. 295) (signed at Chicago on 7 December 1944 and amended by the ICAO Assembly (Doc 7300)). Retrieved from http://www.icao.int/publications/Pages/doc7300.aspx Google Scholar
Crampton, J. (2016). Assemblage of the vertical: commercial drones and algorithmic life. Geographica Helvetica, 71, 137146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funaki, M., Higashino, S., Sakanaka, S., Iwata, N., Nakamura, N., Hirasawa, N., . . . Kuwabarra, M. (2014). Small unmanned aerial vehicles for aeromagnetic surveys and their flights in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Science, 8, 342356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebel, M.E., Perryman, W.L., Hinks, J.T., Krause, D.J., Hann, N.A., Gardner, S. & LeRoi, D.J. (2015). A small unmanned aerial system for estimating abundance and size of Antarctic predators. Polar Biology, 38, 619630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, C. (2016, February 11). Aurora Australis takes drone to Casey Station, Antarctica to capture polar wonders. The Australian (online edition). Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/life/aurora-australis-takes-drone-to-casey-station-antarctica-to-capture-polar-wonders/news-story/0c7e24afaeb89e154d44324c6b2ed138 Google Scholar
Heverly, R. (2015). The state of drones: state authority to regulate drones. Albany Government Law Review, 8, 2962.Google Scholar
Higashino, S., Funaki, M., Hirasawa, M., Hayashi, M. & Nagasaki, S. (2013). Chapter 11: Development and operational experiences of UAVs for scientific research in Antarctica. In: Nonami, K., Kartidjo, M., Yoon, K.-J., & Budiyono, A. (Eds), Autonomous control systems and vehicles. Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
Hyde, C. (2014, February 21). Drone films in Antarctic conditions. Manawatu Standard. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/manawatu-standard/news/9743075/Drone-films-in-Antarctic-conditions Google Scholar
IAATO (International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators). (2015). IAATO policies on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in Antarctica. ATCM XXXVIII Information Paper 088. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
IAATO (International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators). (2016a). IAATO policies on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in Antarctica. ATCM XXXIX Information Paper 120. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
IAATO (International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators). (2016b). Who is IAATO? Newport, RI: IAATO. Retrieved from http://iaato.org/who-is-iaato Google Scholar
IAATO (International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators). (2016c). IAATO statement on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles, 30 April 2015. Newport, RI: IAATO. Retrieved from http://www.poandpo.com/in. . ./iaato-bans-recreational-use-of-drones-in-antarctica-30-5-201 Google Scholar
ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization). (2011). ICAO Cir 328/AN/190, unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). Montréal, QC: ICAO.Google Scholar
Koh, L. & Wich, S. (2012). Dawn of drone ecology: low-cost autonomous aerial vehicles for conservation. Tropical Conservation Science, 5, 121132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuschen, C., Hale, R., Keshmiri, S., Yan, J., Rodriguez-Morales, F., Mahmood, A. & Gogineni, S. (2014). UAS-based radar sounding of the polar ice sheets. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2, 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucieer, A., Turner, D., King, D. & Robinson, S. (2013). Using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to capture micro-topography of Antarctic moss. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 27, 5362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGill, P.R., Reisenbichler, K.R., Etchemendy, S.A., Dawe, T.C. & Hobson, B.W. (2011). Aerial surveys and tagging of free-drifting icebergs using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Deep-Sea Research II - Topical Studies in Oceanography, 58, 13181326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Polar Research (Japan). (2014). Development and use of miniature UAV for Antarctic observation [News release]. Retrieved from http://www.nipr.ac.jp/english/antarctic/pdf/TE-2_E.pdf Google Scholar
National Institute of Polar Research (Japan). (2015). Balloon-assisted UAV brings back stratospheric aerosol samples from altitude of 22 km in Antarctica [News release]. Retrieved from http://www.nipr.ac.jp/english/news/201503.html Google Scholar
Park, H.L., Park, S.-Y., Hyun, C.-U., Kim, H.-C., Hong, S.G. & Lee, R. (2014). UAV based very-high resolution imaging on Barton Peninsula Antarctica (pp. 11.1–11.4). Proceedings of the EARSeL 34th Symposium. Retrieved from http://www.earsel.org/symposia/2014-symposium-Warsaw/pdf_proceedings/EARSeL-Symposium-2014_11_1_park.pdf Google Scholar
Perritt, H. & Sprague, E. (2015). Law abiding drones. The Columbia Science & Technology Law Review, XVI, 385451.Google Scholar
Pimm, S., Alibhai, S., Bergl, R., Dehghan, A., Giri, C., Jewell, Z., . . . Loarie, S. (2015). Emerging technologies to conserve biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 685696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (Madrid Protocol) of 4 October 1991 (30 ILM 1461).Google Scholar
Sanderson, K. (2008, March 18). Unmanned craft chart the Antarctic winter. Nature News. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080318/full/news.2008.680.html Google Scholar
SCAR (Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research). (2015). Wildlife approach distances in Antarctica. ATCM XXXVIII Working Paper 027. Retrieved from https://www.ats.aq Google Scholar
sUASNews. (2014). Unmanned in Antarctica. Retrieved from http://www.suasnews.com/2014/01/unmanned-in-antarctica/ Google Scholar
Takahashi, T. (2013). Drones and privacy. The Columbia Science & Technology Law Review, XIV, 72114.Google Scholar
USAP (United States Antarctic Program). (2014). Programmatic notice 15 September 2014. Arlington, VA: USAP/National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.usap.gov/proposalInformation/documents/USAP%20UAV%20Notice%209-15-14.pdf Google Scholar
Vas, E., Lescroël, A., Duriez, O., Boguszewski, G. & Grémillet, D. (2015). Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines. Biology Letters, 11, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warsaw University of Technology. (2015). WUT's mission in the Antarctic. Retrieved from https://www.pw.edu.pl/engpw/Research2/Business-Innovations-Technology-BIT-of-WUT/WUT-s-Mission-in-the-Antarctic Google Scholar
Williams, G., Fraser, A., Lucieer, A., Turner, D., Cougnon, E., Kimball, P., . . . Paget, M. (2016, January 19). Drones in a cold climate. Earth and Space Science News. Retrieved from https://eos.org/project-updates/drones-in-a-cold-climate Google Scholar
WWF (WorldWide Fund for Nature). (2014). WWF monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) emerging technologies workshop (WCPFC-TCC10-2014-OP02). Paper presented at the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission 11th Regular Session, Apia, Samoa. Retrieved from https://www.wcpfc.int/system/files/WCPFC-TCC10-2014-OP02%20WWF%20MCS%20Emerging%20Technologies%20Workshop%20%28MCS%29%20Summary.pdf Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 52
Total number of PDF views: 269 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 22nd May 2017 - 24th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-kdwz2 Total loading time: 0.942 Render date: 2021-01-24T04:12:41.545Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Drones on ice: an assessment of the legal implications of the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in scientific research and by the tourist industry in Antarctica
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Drones on ice: an assessment of the legal implications of the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in scientific research and by the tourist industry in Antarctica
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Drones on ice: an assessment of the legal implications of the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in scientific research and by the tourist industry in Antarctica
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *