Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:54:18.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Romantic Microethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2021

Alexander Freer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ethical thought typically aims to provide a general account of the good. This essay explores a form of localized ethical attention through British Romantic writing that eschews that aspiration, privileging individual cases in all their detail and particularity. This form, which I term “microethics,” is small in two senses, permitting extremely close observation of individual cases and limiting itself to equally small conclusions. It is most recognizable in poetry but recurs across fiction, drama, and philosophical prose. Considering such thinking allows us to assess and extend recent arguments for the value of Romanticism's small and marginal forms. While Romantic microethics develops in opposition to emerging utilitarian thought and the politically repressive conditions of the 1790s, it anticipates a range of later forms, from Adorno's ethical fragments to deconstruction to anthropological method. At once literary and philosophical, it binds both writing and reading practices to acts of singular attention.

Type
Essays
Information
PMLA , Volume 136 , Issue 5 , October 2021 , pp. 746 - 761
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to audiences at the British Association for Romantic Studies Conference in York, the Wordsworth Summer Conference in Grasmere, and the Eighteenth Century and Romantic Studies Seminar at Cambridge for their responses and to Anna Berman, Ardis Butterfield, Philip Connell, Stacey McDowell, Danny Smith, and Ross Wilson for their perceptive comments on earlier drafts of this essay.

References

Works Cited

“About Season Three.” Serial, 2018, serialpodcast.org/season-three/about.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. Translated by Jephcott, E. F. N., Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Baillie, Joanna. “Introductory Discourse.” Plays on the Passions, edited by Duthie, Peter, Broadview, 2001, pp. 67–113.Google Scholar
Bender, John. Ends of Enlightenment. Stanford UP, 2012.Google Scholar
Blake, William. “Jerusalem.” The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake, edited by Erdman, David, U of California P, 1982 pp. 144–259.Google Scholar
Buck, Charles. A Theological Dictionary: Containing Definitions of All Religious Terms. Woodward, 1818.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Antigone's Claim: Kinship between Life and Death. Columbia UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Caputo, John. Against Ethics: Contributions to a Poetics of Obligation with Constant Reference to Deconstruction. Indiana UP, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, James. England in 1819: The Politics of Literary Culture and the Case of Romantic Historicism. U of Chicago P, 1998.Google Scholar
Chandler, James. Wordsworth's Second Nature. U of Chicago P, 1984.Google Scholar
Cheeke, Stephen. “Shelley's ‘The Cenci’: Economies of a ‘Familiar’ Language.” Keats-Shelley Journal, vol. 47, 1998, pp. 142–60.Google Scholar
Clark, David L., and Khalip, Jacques, editors. Minimal Romanticism. Romantic Circles Praxis, May 2016, romantic-circles.org/praxis/brevity.Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela. “Godwin, Women, and ‘The Collision of Mind with Mind.’” The Wordsworth Circle, vol. 35, no. 2, 2004, pp. 72–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemit, Pamela. “Self-Analysis as Social Critique: The Autobiographical Writings of Godwin and Rousseau.” Romanticism, vol. 11, no. 2, 2005, pp. 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collings, David. “The Romance of the Impossible: William Godwin in the Empty Place of Reason.” ELH, vol. 70, no. 3, 2003, pp. 847–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, Philip. Romanticism, Economics and the Question of ‘Culture.’ Oxford UP, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Roger. Sacrifice Regained: Morality and Self-Interest in British Moral Philosophy from Hobbes to Bentham. Oxford UP, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. Ethics without Principles. Oxford UP, 2005.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. Autobiographic Sketches. De Quincey, Works, vol. 19.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. “Casuistry.” De Quincey, Works, vol. 11, pp. 347–82.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. “The Casuistry of Duelling.” The Uncollected Writings of Thomas De Quincey, vol. 2, edited by Hogg, James, Swan Sonnenschein, 1890, pp. 65–112.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. Confessions of an English Opium-Eater. De Quincey, Works, vol. 2, pp. 88–278.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. Letters to a Young Man Whose Education Has Been Neglected. De Quincey, Works, vol. 3, pp. 39–97.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. “System of the Heavens as Revealed by Lord Rosse's Telescopes.” Tait's Edinburgh Magazine, vol. 13, no. 153, 1846, pp. 566–79.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. The Works of Thomas De Quincey. Edited by Burwick, Frederick et al. Pickering and Chatto, 2002. 21 vols.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Sean. “The Cenci: Tragedy in a Secular Age.” ELH, vol. 79, no. 4, 2012, pp. 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. “Low Epic.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 39, no. 3, spring 2013, pp. 614–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, Mary Ann. “The Close-Up.” Differences, vol. 14, no. 3, 2003, pp. 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, Paul. “The Cenci: Recognizing the Shelleyan Sublime.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 38, nos. 3–4, 1996, pp. 379–97.Google Scholar
Epstein, James. ‘‘‘Equality and No King’: Sociability and Sedition: The Case of John Frost.” Romantic Sociability: Social Networks and Literary Culture in Britain, 1770–1840, edited by Russell, Gillian and Tuite, Clara, Cambridge UP, 2002, pp. 43–61.Google Scholar
Esteve, Marc, et al. “The Effects of Doing More with Less in the Public Sector.” Public Administration Review, vol. 77, no. 4, 2017, pp. 544–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, Aileen. “Return of the Cenci: Theaters of Trauma in Shelley and Artaud.” Comparative Literature, vol. 67, no. 4, 2015, pp. 394–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
François, Anne-Lise. Open Secrets: The Literature of Uncounted Experience. Stanford UP, 2008.Google Scholar
Franta, Andrew. “Godwin's Handshake.” PMLA, vol. 122, no. 3, May 2007, pp. 696–710.Google Scholar
Galperin, William. The History of Missed Opportunities: British Romanticism and the Emergence of the Everyday. Stanford UP, 2017.Google Scholar
Gray, Erik. “‘Save Where . . .’: The Trope of Exceptionality.” ELH, vol. 77, 2010, pp. 645–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, William. Caleb Williams. Edited by Clemit, Pamela, Oxford UP, 2009.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. “Essay on Sepulchres.” Godwin, Political and Philosophical Writings, vol. 6, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. “Of an Early Taste for Reading.” Godwin, Political and Philosophical Writings, vol. 5, pp. 94–97.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. “Of History and Romance.” Godwin, Political and Philosophical Writings, vol. 5, pp. 290–301.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Political and Philosophical Writings of William Godwin. Edited by Philp, Mark et al. , William Pickering, 1993. 7 vols.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Political Justice. Godwin, Political and Philosophical Writings, vol. 3.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Preface to Fleetwood. The Collected Novels and Memoirs of William Godwin, vol. 5, edited by Philp, Mark et al. , Pickering and Chatto, 1992, pp. 7–15.Google Scholar
Grenby, Matthew. “Novels of Opinion.” The Cambridge Companion to British Literature of the French Revolution in the 1790s, edited by Clemit, Pamela, Cambridge UP, 2011, pp. 160–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Gurton-Wachter, Lily. Watchwords: Romanticism and the Poetics of Attention. Stanford UP, 2016.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William. Table Talk. Edited by Wu, Duncan, Pickering and Chatto, 1998.Google Scholar
Heavner, Eric. “Malthus and the Secularization of Political Ideology.” History of Political Thought, vol. 17, no. 3, 1996, pp. 408–30.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. The Science of Logic. Translated by Giovanni, George Di, Cambridge UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Henchman, Anna. The Starry Sky Within: Astronomy and the Reach of the Mind in Victorian Literature. Oxford UP, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herkert, J. R. “Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies.” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 7, 2001, pp. 403–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Samuel. “No. 60. Saturday, 13 October 1750.” The Yale Edition of the Works of Samuel Johnson, vol. 3, edited by Bate, W. J. and Strauss, Albrecht B., Yale UP, 1969, pp. 318–23.Google Scholar
Juengel, Scott J. “Godwin, Lavater, and the Pleasures of Surface.” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 35, no. 1, 1996, pp. 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klancher, Jon. “Godwin and the Republican Romance: Genre, Politics, and Contingency in Cultural History.” MLQ, vol. 56, no. 2, June 1995, pp. 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Michael. “Shelley in Chancery: The Reimagination of the Paternalist State in ‘The Cenci.’” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 37, no. 4, 1998, pp. 545–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Phillipe, and Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Literary Absolute: The Theory of Literature in German Romanticism. Translated by Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cheryl, State U of New York P, 1988.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Eric. “Imagining ‘Things as They Are.’” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 49, no. 3, 2010, pp. 477–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Alan. “Local Transcendence: Cultural Criticism, Postmodernism, and the Romanticism of Detail.” Representations, vol. 32, 1990, pp. 75–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Heather. “Close but Not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn.” New Literary History, vol. 41, no. 2, 2010, pp. 371–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukács, György. The Theory of the Novel. Translated by Bostock, Anna, MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Malthus, Thomas. An Essay on the Principle of Population. J. Johnson, 1798.Google Scholar
Marr, Bernard, and Creelman, James. More with Less: Maximizing Value in the Public Sector. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Wayne. “In Defense of Bad Infinity: A Fichtean Response to Hegel's Differenzschrift.” Hegel Bulletin, vol. 28, nos. 1–2, 2007, pp. 168–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nealon, Christopher. “The Poetic Case.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 33, no. 4, summer 2007, pp. 865–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nersessian, Anahid. The Calamity Form: On Poetry and Social Life. U of Chicago P, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nersessian, Anahid. Utopia, Limited: Romanticism and Adjustment. Harvard UP, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paley, William. The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. R. Faulder, 1785.Google Scholar
Phillips, Mark Salber. Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain, 1740–1820. Princeton UP, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, Alexander. An Essay on Man. Edited by Mack, Maynard, Methuen, 1950.Google Scholar
Potkay, Adam. Wordsworth's Ethics. Johns Hopkins UP, 2012.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, Evan. “Godwin from ‘Metaphysician’ to Novelist: ‘Political Justice,’ ‘Caleb Williams,’ and the Tension between Philosophical Argument and Narrative.” Modern Philology, vol. 97, no. 4, 2000, pp. 528–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajan, Tilottama. “Judging Justice: Godwin's Critique of Judgment in Caleb Williams and Other Novels.” The Eighteenth Century, vol. 51, no. 3, 2010, pp. 341–62.Google Scholar
Review of The Cenci. The Literary Gazette, and Journal of Belles Lettres, Arts, Sciences, no. 167, 1 Apr. 1820, pp. 209–10.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi. Reading in Detail: Aesthetics and the Feminine. Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Cenci. Shelley's Poetry and Prose, edited by Reiman, Donald and Fraistat, Neil, W. W. Norton, 2002, pp. 145–202.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Declaration of Rights. The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, vol. 1, edited by Murray, E. B., Clarendon Press, 1993, pp. 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Letter to John Gisborn. 22 Oct. 1821. The Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley, edited by Jones, Frederick L., vol. 2, Oxford UP, 1964, pp. 362–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Letter to Thomas Hogg. 9 May 1811. The Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley, edited by Jones, Frederick L., vol. 1, Oxford UP, 1964, pp. 80–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Preface to The Cenci. Shelley's Poetry and Prose, edited by Reiman, Donald and Fraistat, Neil, W. W. Norton, 2002, pp. 140–45.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Proposals for an Association of Philanthropists. The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, vol. 1, edited by Murray, E. B., Clarendon Press, 1993, pp. 39–55.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Mark. “De Quincey, Dictionaries, and Casuistry.” ELH, vol. 84, no. 3, 2017, pp. 689–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Kathleen. Ordinary Affects. Duke UP, 2007.Google Scholar
Terada, Rei. “Living a Ruined Life: De Quincey's Damage.” Romanticism and the Emotions, edited by Faflak, Joel and Sha, Richard, Cambridge UP, 2014, pp. 215–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, Earl. Shelley: A Critical Reading. Johns Hopkins UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Men and a Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Edited by Tomaselli, Sylvana, Cambridge UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, Dorothy. The Grasmere and Alfoxden Journals. Edited by Woof, Pamela, Oxford UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. “[Essay on Morals].” The Prose Works of William Wordsworth, vol. 1, edited by Owens, W. J. B. and Smyser, Jane Worthington, Oxford UP, 1974, pp. 103–04.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. “The Old Cumberland Beggar.” Lyrical Ballads, and Other Poems, 1797–1800, edited by Butler, James and Green, Karen, Cornell UP, 1992, pp. 228–34.Google Scholar
Worton, Michael. “Speech and Silence in The Cenci.” Essays on Shelley, edited by Allott, Miriam, Liverpool UP, 1982, pp. 105–20.Google Scholar