Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:04:32.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction to “How We Write Now”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

How we read (closely, distantly, symptomatically, against the grain, or on the surface) has been vigorously debated, and PMLA has helped foster the debate. Distant reading as defined by Franco Moretti is the focus of a recent Theories and Methodologies feature in PMLA, and two forthcoming issues will address “cultures of reading.” Whether we define ourselves as English teachers, public intellectuals in the humanities, or literary or cultural studies scholars, this newly energized attention to how we read reminds us that the critical practice of reading is foundational to our work. No matter what else we do (collect interviews, analyze films, pursue ethnographic field-work), attentive reading is our primary method of analysis and assessment. How we do it and to what ends warrant thoughtful discussion.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bammer, Angelika, and Joeres, Ruth-Ellen Boetcher, editors. The Future of Scholarly Writing: Critical Interventions. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes. Translated by Howard, Richard, Hill and Wang, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael. Learn to Write Badly: How to Succeed in the Social Sciences. Cambridge UP, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvin, Aaron. “Author Teju Cole Talks His New Essay on Immigration, Twitter, and Censorship.” BuzzFeed, 14 Mar. 2014, www.buzzfeed.com/aaronc13/author-teju-cole-talks-his-new-essay-on-immigration-twitter.Google Scholar
Cerwonka, Allaine, and Malkki, Liisa. Improvising Theory: Process and Temporality in Ethnographic Field-work. U of Chicago P, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Teju. “Hafiz.” Twitter, 8 Jan. 2014, twitter.com/tejucole/timelines/437242785591078912?lang=en.Google Scholar
Cole, Teju. “A Piece of the Wall.” Twitter, 13 Mar. 2014, twitter .com/tejucole/timelines/444262126954110977?lang=en.Google Scholar
Coming Soon: Jennifer Egan's ‘Black Box.‘The New Yorker, 23 May 2012, www .newyorker.com/books/page-turner/coming-soon-jennifer-egans-black-box.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, and Lamb, Kevin, editors. Just Being Difficult? Academic Writing in the Public Arena. Stanford UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Egan, Jennifer. “Black Box.” The New Yorker, 4 and 11 June 2012, www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/06/04/black-box-2.Google Scholar
Krementz, Jill. The Writer's Desk. Random House, 1996.Google Scholar
Lingo, Elizabeth Long, and Tepper, Steven J.The Creative Campus: Time for a ‘C’ Change.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 10 Oct. 2010, www.chronicle.com/article/The-Creative-Campus-Time-for/124860.Google Scholar
Nunokawa, Jeff. Note Book. Princeton UP, 2015.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Lisa. “When Nothing Is Cool.” Bammer and Boetcher Joeres, pp. 7185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacco, Joe. Palestine. Fantagraphics Books, 2001.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. “Writers, Authors, and the Extraordinary Ordinary.” Bammer and Boetcher Joeres, pp. 4155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousanis, Nick. Unflattening. Harvard UP, 2015.Google Scholar
Stacey, Jackie, and Wolff, Janet, editors. Writing Otherwise: Experiments in Cultural Criticism. Manchester UP, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sword, Helen. Stylish Academic Writing. Harvard UP, 2012.Google Scholar
Tepper, Steven J.The Creative Campus: Who's No. 1?The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1 Oct. 2004, www.chronicle.com/article/the-creative-campus-whos-no/4870.Google Scholar