Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:05:59.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of early maturing maize landraces and improved varieties to moisture deficit and sufficient water supply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Abebe Menkir ,
Baffour Badu-Apraku ,
Sam Ajala ,
Alpha Kamara  and
Abdou Ndiaye
Abebe Menkir*
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Oyo Road, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
Baffour Badu-Apraku
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Oyo Road, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
Sam Ajala
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Oyo Road, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
Alpha Kamara
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Oyo Road, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
Abdou Ndiaye
Affiliation:
ISRA, Centre National de Recherches Agronomiques de Bambey, BP 53, Bambey, Senegal
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: a.menkir@cgiar.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In drought-affected maize production zones with short growing periods, the development and use of early maturing drought-tolerant cultivars can stabilize maize production. We evaluated 10 improved and 25 farmers' early maturing maize varieties under moisture deficit and well-watered conditions for 2 years to identify suitable genetic materials for breeding drought-tolerant cultivars. The varieties exhibited significant differences in grain yield and other traits under both moisture deficit and well-watered conditions. Changes in the rank order of the varieties for grain yield was not significant across the different levels of moisture supply in this study. Grain yield was significantly correlated with days to anthesis, days to silking, plant height, ear height, ear number and anthesis–silking interval (ASI) under the two irrigation treatments and with leaf death scores under moisture deficit, suggesting that the common traits were beneficial in maximizing grain yield under both sufficient water supply and moisture deficit. Grain yield and the traits significantly correlated with it differentiated the early maturing maize varieties into two distinct groups under well-watered condition and moisture deficit. The improved varieties were superior to the farmers' varieties in grain yield and other traits under moisture deficit, possibly due to selection of their progenitors for improved performance in multiple locations. We found some farmers' and improved varieties with similar yield potential and flowering time under well-watered conditions but with marked differences in grain yield and other traits under moisture deficit. Use of such promising landraces that would also be invaluable sources of desirable farmers-preferred end-use quality traits in combination with promising improved varieties as breeding materials could enhance the genetic grain from selection for drought tolerance in early maize.

Keywords

early maturing maizeimproved varietieslandracesmoisture deficit
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 205 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, RB, Ford, M and Morgan, CL (1989) Genetic improvement in the yield of winter wheat: a further evaluation. Journal of Agricultural Science 112: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bänziger, M, Edmeades, GO and Lafitte, RH (2002) Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased N stress tolerance of tropical maize selected for drought tolerance. Field Crops Research 75: 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, A (1997) Constitutive traits affecting plant performance under stress. In: Edmeades, GO, Bänziger, M, Mickelson, HR and Pena-Valdivia, CB (eds) Developing Drought- and Low N-Tolerant Maize. El Batan, Texcoco: CIMMYT/UNDP, pp. 415–525.Google Scholar
Blum, A (2006) Drought adaptation in cereal crops – a prologue. In: Ribaut, J-M (ed.) Drought Tolerance in Cereals. Binghamtown, NY: The Haworth Press Inc., pp. 10–18.Google Scholar
Blum, A and Sullivan, CY (1986) The comparative drought resistance of landraces of sorghum and millet from dry and humid regions. Annals of Botany 57: 835–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, A, Golan, G and Mayer, J (1991) Progress achieved by breeding open-pollinated cultivars as compared with landraces of sorghum. Journal of Agricultural Science 117: 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolaños, J and Edmeades, GO (1993a) Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass, and radiation utilization. Field Crops Research 31: 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolaños, J and Edmeades, GO (1993b) Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. II. Responses in reproductive behaviour. Field Crops Research 48: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrell, AK, Hammer, GL and Henzell, RG (2000) Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? II. Dry matter production and yield. Crop Science 40: 1037–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulman, P, Mather, DE and Smith, DL (1993) Genetic improvement of spring barley cultivars grown in eastern Canada from 1910 to 1988. Euphytica 71: 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, H, Cooper, M, Habben, JE, Edmeades, GO and Schussler, JR (2004) Drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops Research 90: 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castleberry, RM, Crum, CW and Krull, CF (1984) Genetic yield improvement of US cultivars under varying fertility and climatic environments. Crop Science 24: 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccarelli, S (1996) Adaptation to low/high input cultivation. Euphytica 92: 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccarelli, S and Grando, S (1989) Efficiency of empirical selection under stress conditions in barley. Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 43: 25–31.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, S, Grando, S and Hamblin, J (1992) Relationship between barley yields measured in low-and high-yielding environments. Euphytica 64: 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denčić, S, Kastori, R, Kobiljski, B and Duggan, B (2000) Evaluation of grain yield and its components in wheat cultivars and landraces under near optimal and drought conditions. Euphytica 113: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DNRP-GAPCC (2000) Climate scenarios for semi-arid and sub-humid regions: a comparison of climate scenarios for the dryland regions, in West Africa from 1990 to 2050 Report No. 410 200 050 (2000) Dutch National Research Program on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change (DNRP-GAPCC).Google Scholar
Duvick, DN and Cassman, KG (1999) Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of improved maize in the North-Centre United States. Crop Science 39: 1622–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duvick, DN, Smith, JCS and Cooper, M (2004) Long-term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program. Plant Breeding Review 24: 109–151.Google Scholar
Edmeades, GO, Bolaños, J, Bänziger, M, Chapman, SC, Ortega, CA, Lafitte, HR, Fischer, KS and Pandy, S (1997) Recurrent selection under managed drought stress improves grain yields in tropical maize. In: Edmeades, GO, Bänziger, M, Mickelson, HR and Pena-Valdivia, CB (eds) Developing Drought- and Low N-Tolerant Maize. El Batan, Texcoco: CIMMYT/UNDP, pp. 415–525.Google Scholar
Evans, LT and Fischer, RA (1999) Yield potential: its definition, measurement and significance. Crop Science 39: 1544–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Framkel, OH, Brown, AHD and Burdon, JJ (1998) The Conservation of Plant Biodiversity. 2nd edn. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–78.Google Scholar
Hallauer, AR (1991) Use of genetic variation for breeding population in cross-pollinated species. In: Stalker, HT and Murphy, JP (eds) Plant Breeding in the 1990s. Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 37–67.Google Scholar
Johnson, EC, Fischer, KS, Edmeades, GO and Palmer, AEF (1986) Recurrent selection for reduced plant height in lowland tropical maize. Crop Science 26: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A and Spilde, LA (1992) Response of hard red spring wheat genotypes to management systems. Crop Science 32: 206–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, PJ and Frey, KJ (1993) Genetics improvement in agronomic and physiological traits of oat since 1914. Crop Science 33: 984–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, JC (2005) Maize and Grace: Africa's Encounter with a New World Crop, 1500–2000. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkir, A and Akintunde, AO (2001) Evaluation of the performance of maize hybrids, improved open-pollinated and farmers' local varieties under well-watered and drought stress conditions. Maydica 46: 227–238.Google Scholar
Menkir, A and Kling, JG (1999) Effect of reciprocal recurrent selection on grain yield and other traits in two early-maturing maize populations. Maydica 44: 159–165.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Perea, CarlosGerman, Terán, H, Allen, RG, Wright, JL, Westermann, DT and Singh, SP (2006) Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Science 46: 2111–2120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NeSmith, DS and Ritchie, JT (1992) Effects of soil water-deficits during tassel emergence on development and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Research 28: 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanou, J, Gouesnard, B and Charrier, A (1997) Isozyme variability in West African Maize cultivars (Zea mays L.). Maydica 42: 1–11.Google Scholar
SAS Institute, (2001) Statistical Analysis Software (SAS), Users Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Shroyer, JP and Cox, TS (1993) Productivity and adaptive capacity of winter wheat landraces and modern cultivars grown under low-fertility conditions. Euphytica 70: 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollenaar, M and Wu, J (1999) Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Science 39: 1597–1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellhausen, EJ (1978) Recent developments in maize breeding in the tropics. In: Walden, DB (ed.) Genetics. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp. 59–89.Google Scholar