Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Learning in Harmonic Serialism and the necessity of a richer base*

  • Anne-Michelle Tessier (a1) and Karen Jesney (a2)

Abstract

This paper reassesses the hypothesis that early phonotactic learning of constraint-based grammars relies on the Identity Map – i.e. it uses observed surface forms as the inputs which cause errors and drive learning via constraint reranking. We argue that this approach's success is closely tied to Optimality Theory's fully parallel grammatical evaluation. In the constraint-based derivational framework of Harmonic Serialism (HS; McCarthy 2000, 2007b ), reliance on observed surface forms as inputs can block the discovery of ‘hidden rankings’ between markedness constraints, preventing the learner from discovering a restrictive grammar. This paper illustrates the problem, using a pattern of positional vowel restrictions in Punu (Kwenzi Mikala 1980), and considers the role of various learning assumptions. We conclude that hidden rankings are a fundamental obstacle to restrictive error-driven learning in any HS-like framework, and that learning in such frameworks inevitably requires consideration of some unattested surface forms as inputs, even at the earliest learning stages.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All
*

We wish to thank the three anonymous Phonology reviewers and the editors for their generous and challenging questions, and especially for their comments that compelled us to search for a real-world language example. For suggestions and feedback on this and related work, we also thank Michael Becker, John McCarthy, Claire Moore-Cantwell, Joe Pater, Robert Staubs, Matt Wolf and audiences at NELS 42, MIT, the University of Michigan and the University of Toronto.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Alderete, John & Tesar, Bruce (2002). Learning covert phonological interaction: an analysis of the problem posed by the interaction of stress and epenthesis. RuCCS Technical Report TR-72. Available as ROA-543 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Anttila, Arto (1997). Deriving variation from grammar. In Hinskens, Frans, van Hout, Roeland & Wetzels, W. Leo (eds.) Variation, change and phonological theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 3568.
Anttila, Arto (2002). Variation and phonological theory. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.) The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell. 206243.
Apoussidou, Diana (2007). The learnability of metrical phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Baković, Eric (2007). A revised typology of opaque generalisations. Phonology 24. 217259.
Becker, Michael, Ketrez, Nihan & Nevins, Andrew (2011). The surfeit of the stimulus: analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Lg 87. 84125.
Berent, Iris, Lennertz, Tracy, Jun, Jongho, Moreno, Miguel A. & Smolensky, Paul (2008). Language universals in human brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105. 53215325.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (1999). Constraint interaction in language change: quantity in English and Germanic. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester & University of Santiago de Compostela.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2003). The acquisition of phonological opacity. In Spenader et al. (2003). 2536.
Boersma, Paul (1998). Functional phonology: formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Boersma, Paul (2001). Phonology–semantics interaction in OT, and its acquisition. University of Alberta Papers in Experimental and Theoretical Linguistics 6. 2435. Available as ROA-369 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Boersma, Paul (2009). Some correct error-driven versions of the Constraint Demotion Algorithm. LI 40. 667686.
Boersma, Paul & Hayes, Bruce (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. LI 32. 4586.
Elfner, Emily (to appear). Stress–epenthesis interactions in Harmonic Serialism. In McCarthy & Pater (to appear).
Goldwater, Sharon & Johnson, Mark (2003). Learning OT constraint rankings using a Maximum Entropy model. In Spenader et al. (2003). 111120.
Hayes, Bruce (2004). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages. In Kager et al. (2004). 158203.
Hayes, Bruce & Londe, Zsuzsa Cziráky (2006). Stochastic phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology 23. 59104.
Hyman, Larry M. (2002). Is there a right-to-left bias in vowel harmony? Paper presented at the 9th International Phonology Meeting, Vienna. Available (January 2014) at http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~hyman/Hyman_Vienna_VH_paper_forma.pdf.
Hyman, Larry M. (2008). Enlarging the scope of phonologization. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report. 382408.
Jarosz, Gaja (2006). Rich lexicons and restrictive grammars: maximum likelihood learning in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
Jesney, Karen (2011). Positional faithfulness, non-locality, and the Harmonic Serialism solution. NELS 39. 429440.
Jesney, Karen & Tessier, Anne-Michelle (2011). Biases in Harmonic Grammar: the road to restrictive learning. NLLT 29. 251290.
Jusczyk, Peter W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kager, René (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kager, René, Pater, Joe & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.) (2004). Constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, Aaron (2011). Harmonic improvement without candidate chains in Chamorro. LI 42. 631650.
Kimper, Wendell (2011). Locality and globality in phonological variation. NLLT 29. 423465.
Kimper, Wendell (2012). Harmony is myopic: reply to Walker 2010. LI 43. 301309.
Kiparsky, Paul (1968). Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Bach, Emmon & Harms, Robert T. (eds.) Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 170202.
Kiparsky, Paul (1973). Abstractness, opacity, and global rules. In Fujimura, Osamu (ed.) Three dimensions in linguistic theory. Tokyo: TEC. 5786.
Kiparsky, Paul (2000). Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17. 351365.
Kwenzi Mikala, Jérôme (1980). Esquisse phonologique du punu. In Nsuka-Nkutsi, F. (ed.) Éléments de description du punu. Lyon: CRLS, Université Lyon II. 718.
Legendre, Géraldine, Miyata, Yoshiro & Smolensky, Paul (1990). Harmonic Grammar: a formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: an application. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 884891.
McCarthy, John J. (2000). Harmonic serialism and parallelism. NELS 30. 501524.
McCarthy, John J. (2007a). Hidden generalizations: phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.
McCarthy, John J. (2007b). Restraint of analysis. In Blaho, Sylvia, Bye, Patrik & Krämer, Martin (eds.) Freedom of analysis? Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 203231.
McCarthy, John J. (2008a). The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology 25. 271319.
McCarthy, John J. (2008b). The serial interaction of stress and syncope. NLLT 26. 499546.
McCarthy, John J. (2010). Studying Gen . Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 13:2. 312.
McCarthy, John J. & Pater, Joe (eds.) (to appear). Harmonic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism. London: Equinox.
Moreton, Elliott (2002). Structural constraints in the perception of English stop-sonorant clusters. Cognition 84. 5571.
Moreton, Elliott (2008). Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25. 83127.
Pater, Joe (2012). Serial Harmonic Grammar and Berber syllabification. In Borowsky, Toni, Kawahara, Shigeto, Shinya, Takahito & Sugahara, Mariko (eds.) Prosody matters: essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk. London: Equinox. 4372.
Pater, Joe (to appear). Canadian raising with language-specific weighted constraints. Lg. Available (January 2014) at http://people.umass.edu/pater/pater-raising-hg-2013.pdf.
Pater, Joe, Staubs, Robert, Jesney, Karen & Smith, Brian (2012). Learning probabilities over underlying representations. In Proceedings of the 12th Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Computational Morphology and Phonology. Montreal: Association for Computational Linguistics. 6271. Available (January 2014) at http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W12-2308.
Pertz, D. L. & Bever, T. G. (1975). Sensitivity to phonological universals in children and adolescents. Lg 51. 149162.
Potts, Christopher, Pater, Joe, Jesney, Karen, Bhatt, Rajesh & Becker, Michael (2010). Harmonic Grammar with linear programming: from linear systems to linguistic typology. Phonology 27. 77117.
Prince, Alan (2002). Entailed ranking arguments. Ms, Rutgers University. Available as ROA-500 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.
Prince, Alan & Tesar, Bruce (2004). Learning phonotactic distributions. In Kager et al. (2004). 245291.
Pruitt, Kathryn (2010). Serialism and locality in constraint-based metrical parsing. Phonology 27. 481526.
Pruitt, Kathryn (2012). Stress in Harmonic Serialism. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Rubach, Jerzy (2000). Glide and glottal stop insertion in Slavic languages: a DOT analysis. LI 31. 271317.
Smolensky, Paul (1996). On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. LI 27. 720731.
Smolensky, Paul & Legendre, Géraldine (eds.) (2006). The harmonic mind: from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Jennifer, Spenader, Eriksson, Anders & Dahl, Östen (eds.) (2003). Variation within Optimality Theory: Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop. Stockholm: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.
Staubs, Robert & Pater, Joe (to appear). Learning probabilistic Serial Harmonic Grammars. In McCarthy & Pater (to appear).
Tesar, Bruce (1996). Computing optimal descriptions for Optimality Theory grammars with context-free position structures. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. 101107.
Tesar, Bruce (2008). Output-driven maps. Ms, Rutgers University. Available as ROA-956 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Tesar, Bruce (2011). Learning phonological grammars for output-driven maps. NELS 39. 785798.
Tesar, Bruce, Alderete, John, Horwood, Graham, Merchant, Nazarré, Nishitani, Koichi & Prince, Alan (2003). Surgery in language learning. WCCFL 22. 477490.
Tesar, Bruce & Prince, Alan (2007). Using phonotactics to learn phonological alternations. CLS 39:2. 209237.
Tesar, Bruce & Smolensky, Paul (1998). Learnability in Optimality Theory. LI 29. 229268.
Tesar, Bruce & Smolensky, Paul (2000). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Tessier, Anne-Michelle (2007). Biases and stages in phonological acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Tessier, Anne-Michelle (2013). Error-driven learning and Harmonic Serialism. NELS 42:2. 545558.
Walker, Rachel (2010). Nonmyopic harmony and the nature of derivations. LI 41. 169179.
White, Katherine S., Peperkamp, Sharon, Kirk, Cecilia & Morgan, James L. (2008). Rapid acquisition of phonological alternations by infants. Cognition 107. 238265.
Wilson, Colin (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30. 945982.

Learning in Harmonic Serialism and the necessity of a richer base*

  • Anne-Michelle Tessier (a1) and Karen Jesney (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed