Skip to main content Accessibility help

Gerard Manley Hopkins' sprung rhythm: corpus study and stochastic grammar*

  • Bruce Hayes (a1) and Claire Moore-Cantwell (a2)


Sprung rhythm is a complex poetic metre invented and used by Gerard Manley Hopkins. We re-examine and amplify a seminal analysis of this metre by Kiparsky (1989). We coded the sprung rhythm corpus for stress, weight and phrasing, then used a computer program to locate every scansion compatible with Kiparsky's analysis. The analysis appears to be nearly exceptionless. However, it is incomplete in that it permits dozens or even hundreds of scansions for certain lines. We propose a Parsability Principle for metrics mandating that ambiguity of scansion be minimised, and suggest that under this proposal, the Kiparskyan system is not a possible metre. Our own revised analysis adds ten new constraints and is cast in the form of a stochastic maxent grammar. It produces an acceptably low level of ambiguity in metrical parsing, and is supported by a good match to the diacritics Hopkins employed to mark his intended scansion.



Hide All
Abbott, Claude Colleer (1935a). The correspondence of Gerard Manley Hopkins and Richard Watson Dixon. London: Oxford University Press.
Abbott, Claude Colleer (1935b). The letters of Gerard Manley Hopkins to Robert Bridges. London: Oxford University Press.
Abbott, Claude Colleer (1956). Further letters of Gerard Manley Hopkins. 2nd edn. London: Oxford University Press.
Anttila, Arto (1997a). Variation in Finnish phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Anttila, Arto (1997b). Deriving variation from grammar. In Hinskens, Frans, van Hout, Roeland & Wetzels, W. Leo (eds.) Variation, change and phonological theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 3568.
Attridge, Derek (1982). The rhythms of English poetry. London & New York: Longman.
Bailey, James (1975). Toward a statistical analysis of English verse: the iambic tetrameter of ten poets. Lisse: de Ridder.
Barnes, Mervin & Esau, Helmut (1978). English prosody reconsidered. Language and Style 11. 212222.
Biggs, Henry (1996). A statistical analysis of the metrics of the classic French decasyllable and the classic French alexandrine. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Boersma, Paul (1997). How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 21. 4358.
Boersma, Paul & Hayes, Bruce (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. LI 32. 4586.
Boersma, Paul & Pater, Joe (2008). Convergence properties of a gradual learning algorithm for Harmonic Grammar. Ms, University of Amsterdam & University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available as ROA-970 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2010). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.42).
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana & Baayen, R. Harald (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In Bouma, Gerlof, Krämer, Irene & Zwarts, Joost (eds.) Cognitive foundations of interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. 6994.
Bridges, Robert (1921). Milton's prosody: with a chapter on accentual verse. London: Oxford University Press.
Callow, John C. (1965). Kasem nominals: a study in analyses. Journal of West African Languages 2. 2936.
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Della Pietra, Stephen, Pietra, Vincent Della & Lafferty, John (1997). Inducing features of random fields. IEEE Transactions: Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19. 380393.
de Lacy, Paul (2004). Markedness conflation in Optimality Theory. Phonology 21. 145199.
Dresher, B. Elan & Friedberg, Nila (eds.) (2006). Formal approaches to poetry: recent developments in metrics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dresher, B. Elan & Lahiri, Aditi (1991). The Germanic foot: metrical coherence in Old English. LI 22. 251286.
Duda, Richard O., Hart, Peter E. & Stork, David G. (2001). Pattern classification. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
Elwert, W. Theodor (1984). Italienische Metrik. 2nd edn. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
Fabb, Nigel (2001). Weak monosyllables in iambic verse and the communication of metrical form. Lingua 111. 771790.
Fabb, Nigel (2002). Language and literary structure: the linguistic analysis of form in verse and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fabb, Nigel (2006). Generated metrical form and implied metrical form. In Dresher, & Friedberg, (2006). 7791.
Fabb, Nigel & Halle, Morris (2008). Meter in poetry: a new theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldwater, Sharon & Johnson, Mark (2003). Learning OT constraint rankings using a Maximum Entropy model. In Spenador, Jennifer, Eriksson, Anders & Dahl, Östen (eds.) Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory. Stockholm: Stockholm University. 111120.
Gussenhoven, Carlos (1986). English plosive allophones and ambisyllabicity. Gramma 10. 119141.
Halle, Morris & Keyser, Samuel Jay (1966). Chaucer and the study of prosody. College English 28. 187219.
Hanson, Kristin (1992). Resolution in modern meters. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Hanson, Kristin (2002). Quantitative meter in English: the lesson of Sir Philip Sidney. English Language and Linguistics 5. 4191.
Hanson, Kristin & Kiparsky, Paul (1996). A parametric theory of poetic meter. Lg 72. 287335.
Hayes, Bruce (1983). A grid-based theory of English meter. LI 14. 357393.
Hayes, Bruce (1989). The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In Kiparsky, & Youmans, (1989). 201260.
Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayes, Bruce (2009). Introductory phonology. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hayes, Bruce, Tesar, Bruce & Zuraw, Kie (2010). OTSoft 2.3.1. Software package.
Hayes, Bruce & Wilson, Colin (2008). A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. LI 39. 379440.
Healey, Joseph F. (1999). Statistics: a tool for social research. Belmont, Ca.: Wadsworth.
Holder, Alan (1995). Rethinking meter: a new approach to the verse line. Lewisburg, Pa.: Bucknell University Press.
House, Humphry (1959). The journals and papers of Gerard Manley Hopkins. London: Oxford University Press.
Hurley, Michael D. (2005). Darkening the subject of Hopkins' prosody. Victorian Poetry 43. 485496.
Jespersen, Otto (1933). Notes on metre. In Jespersen, Otto. Linguistica: selected papers in English, French and German. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard. 249274. Paper originally presented in Danish in 1900.
Kahn, Daniel (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published 1980, New York: Garland.
Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.
Kessler, Brett (1992). External sandhi in Classical Sanskrit. MA thesis, Stanford University.
Kiparsky, Paul (1975). Stress, syntax, and meter. Lg 51. 576616.
Kiparsky, Paul (1977). The rhythmic structure of English verse. LI 8. 189247.
Kiparsky, Paul (1982). Lexical phonology and morphology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 391.
Kiparsky, Paul (1989). Sprung rhythm. In Kiparsky, & Youmans, (1989). 305340.
Kiparsky, Paul (2005). Where Stochastic OT fails: a discrete model of metrical variation. BLS 31. 409430.
Kiparsky, Paul (2006). A modular metrics for folk verse. In Dresher, & Friedberg, (2006). 7–49.
Kiparsky, Paul & Youmans, Gilbert (eds.) (1989). Rhythm and meter. San Diego: Academic Press.
Koelb, Clayton (1979). The iambic parameter revisited. Neophilologus 63. 321329.
Ladd, D. Robert (1986). Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook 3. 311340.
McCarthy, John J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20. 75–138.
MacKenzie, Norman H. (ed.) (1990). The poetical works of Gerard Manley Hopkins. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MacKenzie, Norman H. (1991). The later poetic manuscripts of Gerard Manley Hopkins in facsimile. New York & London: Garland.
Magnuson, Karl & Ryder, Frank G. (1970). The study of English prosody: an alternative proposal. College English 31. 789820.
Malouf, Robert (2002). A comparison of algorithms for maximum entropy parameter estimation. In Roth, Dan & van den Bosch, Antal (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Computational Language Learning (CoNLL-2002). New Brunswick: Association for Computational Linguistics. 4955.
Mester, Armin (1994). The quantitative trochee in Latin. NLLT 12. 161.
Moore-Cantwell, Claire (2009). Gerard Manley Hopkins' diacritics: a corpus-based study. Ms, University of California, Los Angeles.
Myers, Jerome L., Well, Arnold D. & Lorch, Robert F. Jr. (2010). Research design and statistical analysis. 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene (2007). Prosodic phonology. 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Opie, Iona & Opie, Peter (1951). The Oxford dictionary of nursery rhymes. London: Oxford University Press.
Oxford English Dictionary. Online edition (accessed May 2011). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pater, Joe & Tessier, Anne-Michelle (2003). Phonotactic knowledge and the acquisition of alternations. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Productions. 11771180.
Pinheiro, José C. & Bates, Douglas M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
Prince, Alan (1989). Metrical forms. In Kiparsky, & Youmans, (1989). 4580.
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.
Russom, Geoffrey (1987). Old English meter and linguistic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Selkirk, Elisabeth (1980). Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In Aronoff, Mark & Kean, Mary-Louise (eds.) Juncture. Saratoga: Anma Libri. 107129.
Selkirk, Elisabeth (1984). Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Sihler, Andrew L. (1995). New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siptár, Péter & Törkenczy, Miklós (2000). The phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smolensky, Paul & Legendre, Géraldine (eds.) (2006). The harmonic mind: from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Sprott, S. Ernest (1953). Milton's art of prosody. Oxford: Blackwell.
Steele, Timothy (1999). All the fun's in how you say a thing: an explanation of meter and versification. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Tarlinskaja, Marina (1976). English verse: theory and history. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
Tarlinskaja, Marina (2006). What is ‘metricality’? English iambic pentameter. In Dresher, & Friedberg, (2006). 5376.
Tarlinskaja, Marina & Teterina, L. M. (1974). Verse – prose – metre. Linguistics 129. 6386.
Wells, John C. (1982). The accents of English. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, Colin (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30. 945982.
Wilson, Colin & George, Benjamin (2009). Maxent grammar tool. Computer program. Available at
Wimsatt, James I. (1998). Alliteration and Hopkins's sprung rhythm. Poetics Today 19. 531564.
Wimsatt, James I. (2006). Hopkins's poetics of speech sound: sprung rhythm, lettering, inscape. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Witten, Ian H. & Frank, Eibe (2005). Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. 2nd edn. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Young, George (1928). An English prosody on inductive lines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Youmans, Gilbert (1989). Milton's meter. In Kiparsky, & Youmans, (1989). 341379.
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Hayes and Moore-Cantwell supplementary material
Text files

 Unknown (501 KB)
501 KB
Supplementary materials

Hayes and Moore-Cantwell
Supplementary information

 PDF (41 KB)
41 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed