Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Building phonological lexical representations*

  • Suzanne V. H. van der Feest (a1) and Paula Fikkert (a2)

Abstract

This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on how much detail young children's word representations contain. We investigate early representations of place of articulation and voicing contrasts, inspired by previously attested asymmetrical patterns in children's early word productions. We tested Dutch-learning 20- and 24-month-olds’ perception of these fundamentally different contrasts in a mispronunciation-detection paradigm. Our results show that different kinds and directions of phonological changes yield different effects. Both 20- and 24-month-olds noticed coronal mispronunciations of labials, but not vice versa. The 24-month-olds noticed voiced mispronunciations of voiceless stops, but not vice versa, while the 20-month-olds failed to notice any voicing mispronunciations. We argue that early lexical representations are specified in very systematic ways, that not all phonological contrasts are encoded at the same time and that the phonological system of a language determines which contrasts are specified first in the representations of early words.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All
*

This research was supported by NWO (Dutch NSF) grant 360-70-100, awarded to Paula Fikkert and René Kager. All experiments were conducted in the Nijmegen Baby Research Center, supported by the NWO Spinoza grant ‘Native and non-native listening’, awarded to Anne Cutler. We thank Angela Khadar and the rest of the Nijmegen Baby Research Center staff, as well as all participating parents and children for their assistance in the completion of this study. We thank Fieke Noordzij for her help with recordings, Christopher Fennell, and four anonymous reviewers for comments on previous versions of this manuscript. This research was completed as part of the first author's PhD dissertation.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Alphen, Petra M. van (2004). Perceptual relevance of prevoicing in Dutch. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Alphen, Petra M. van & Smits, Roel (2004). Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: the role of prevoicing. JPh 32. 455491.
Altvater-Mackensen, Nicole, van der Feest, Suzanne V. H. & Fikkert, Paula (2014). Asymmetries in early word recognition: the case of stops and fricatives. Language Learning and Development 10. 149178.
Aslin, Richard N., Pisoni, David B., Hennessy, Beth L. & Perey, Alan J. (1981). Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: new findings and implications for the effects of early experience. Child Development 52. 11351145.
Bailey, Todd M. & Plunkett, Kim (2002). Phonological specificity in early words. Cognitive Development 17. 12651282.
Barlow, Jessica A. & Gierut, Judith A. (1999). Optimality Theory in phonological acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 42. 14821498.
Bergelson, Elika & Swingley, Daniel (2012). At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109. 32533258.
Booij, Geert (1995). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cho, Taehong & Ladefoged, Peter (1999). Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. JPh 27. 207229.
Clements, G. N. (2001). Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In Hall, T. Alan (ed.) Distinctive feature theory. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 71146.
Clements, G. N. (2003). Feature economy in sound systems. Phonology 20. 287333.
Cutler, Anne & Clifton, Charles C. Jr. (1999). Comprehending spoken language: a blueprint of the listener. In Brown, Colin M. & Hagoort, Peter (eds.) The neurocognition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 123166.
Davis, Barbara L. & MacNeilage, Peter F. (2000). An embodiment perspective on the acquisition of speech perception. Phonetica 57. 229241.
Dresher, B. Elan (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eimas, Peter D., Siqueland, Einar R., Jusczyk, Peter & Vigorito, James (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science 171. 303306.
Eulitz, Carsten & Lahiri, Aditi (2004). Neurobiological evidence for abstract phonological representations in the mental lexicon during speech recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16. 577583.
Feest, Suzanne V. H. van der (2004). Acquiring voicing in Dutch: the role of function words. In Cornips, Leonie & Doetjes, Jenny (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 2004. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 4757.
Feest, Suzanne V. H. van der (2007). Building a phonological lexicon: the acquisition of the Dutch voicing contrast in perception and production. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Fennell, Christopher T. (2012). Object familiarity enhances infants’ use of phonetic detail in novel words. Infancy 17. 339353.
Fennell, Christopher T. & Waxman, Sandra R. (2010). What paradox? Referential cues allow for infant use of phonetic detail in word learning. Child Development 81. 13761383.
Fenson, Larry, Dale, Phillip S., Reznick, J. Steven, Thal, Donna, Bates, Elizabeth, Hartung, J. P., Pethick, Stephen J. & Reilly, Judy S. (1993). The MacArthur communicative development inventories: user's guide and technical manual. San Diego: Singular.
Ferguson, Charles A. & Farwell, Carol B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Lg 51. 419439.
Fernald, Anne, Zangl, Renate, Portillo, Ana Luiz & Marchman, Virginia A. (2008). Looking while listening: using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In Sekerina, Irina A., Fernández, Eva M. & Clahsen, Harald (eds.) Developmental psycholinguistics: on-line methods in children's language processing. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 97135.
Fikkert, Paula (2005). Getting sounds structures in mind: acquisition bridging linguistics and psychology? In Cutler, Anne (ed.) Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: four cornerstones. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 4356.
Fikkert, Paula (2007). Acquiring phonology. In de Lacy, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 537554.
Fikkert, Paula & C. Levelt, Clara (2008). How does Place fall into place? The lexicon and emergent constraints in children's developing phonological grammar. In Avery, Peter, Dresher, B. Elan & Rice, Keren (eds.) Contrast in phonology: theory, perception, acquisition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 231268.
Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick, Hirsch-Pasek, Kathryn, Cauley, Kathleen M. & Gordon, Laura (1987). The eyes have it: lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language 14. 2345.
Hallé, Pierre A. & de Boysson-Bardies, Bénédicte (1996). The format of representation of recognized words in infants early receptive lexicon. Infant Behavior and Development 19. 463481.
Hollich, George (2005). Supercoder: a program for coding preferential looking (version 10.5). Software package. Available (May 2015) at http://hincapie.psych.purdue.edu/Splitscreen/.
Ingram, David (1974). Phonological rules in young children. Journal of Child Language 1. 4964.
Iverson, Gregory K. & Salmons, Joseph C. (1995). Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology 12. 369396.
Jakobson, Roman (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Translated 1968 by Keiler, Allan R. as Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
Johnson, Elizabeth K. (2005). English-learning infants’ representations of word forms with iambic stress. Infancy 7. 99109.
Jusczyk, Peter W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Jusczyk, Peter W. & Aslin, Richard N. (1995). Infants’ detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology 29. 123.
Kager, René, van der Feest, Suzanne V. H., Fikkert, Paula, Kerkhoff, Annemarie & Zamuner, Tania S. (2007). Representations of [voice]: evidence from acquisition. In van de Weijer, Jeroen & van der Torre, Erik Jan (eds.) Voicing in Dutch: (De)voicing – phonology, phonetics, and psycholinguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 4180.
Kager, René, Pater, Joe & Zonneveld, Wim (2004). Introduction: constraints in phonological acquisition. In Kager, René, Pater, Joe & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.) Constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 153.
Kehoe, Margaret M., Lleó, Conxita & Rakow, Martin (2004). Voice onset time in bilingual German-Spanish children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7. 7188.
Kuhl, Patricia K., Andruski, Jean E., Chistovich, Inna A., Chistovich, Ludmilla A., Kozhevnikova, Elena V., Ryskina, Viktoria L., Stolyarova, Elvira I., Sundberg, Ulla & Lacerda, Francisco (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science 277. 684686.
Kuijpers, Cecile T. L. (1996). Perception of the voicing contrast by Dutch children and adults. JPh 24. 367382.
Lahiri, Aditi & Marslen-Wilson, William (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition 38. 245294.
Lahiri, Aditi & Reetz, Henning (2002). Underspecified recognition. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.) Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 637675.
Levelt, Clara C. (1994). On the acquisition of place. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
McClelland, James L. & Elman, Jeffrey L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18. 186.
Mani, Nivedita & Plunkett, Kim (2007). Phonological specificity of vowels and consonants in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language 57. 252272.
Marslen-Wilson, William D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25. 71102.
Maye, Jessica, Werker, Janet F. & Gerken, LouAnn (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 82. B101B111.
Nazzi, Thierry (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition 98. 1330.
Paradis, Carole & Prunet, Jean-François (1989). On coronal transparency. Phonology 6. 317348.
Paradis, Carole & Prunet, Jean-François (eds.) (1991). The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence. San Diego: Academic Press.
Pater, Joe, Stager, Christine L. & Werker, Janet F. (2004). The perceptual acquisition of phonological contrasts. Lg 80. 384402.
Pater, Joe & Werle, Adam (2003). Direction of assimilation in child consonant harmony. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48. 385408.
Quam, Carolyn & Swingley, Daniel (2010). Phonological knowledge guides 2-year-olds’ and adults’ interpretation of salient pitch contours in word learning. Journal of Memory and Language 62. 135150.
Rice, Keren (1996). Default variability: the coronal–velar relationship. NLLT 14. 493543.
Rose, Yvan (2000). Headedness and prosodic licensing in the L1 acquisition of phonology. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Rose, Yvan & Inkelas, Sharon (2011). The interpretation of phonological patterns in first language acquisition. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 24142438.
Smith, Neilson V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology: a case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smits, Roel, Warner, Natasha, McQueen, James M. & Cutler, Anne (2003). Unfolding of phonetic information over time: a database of Dutch diphone perception. JASA 113. 563574.
Stager, Christine L. & Werker, Janet F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature 6640. 381382.
Stevens, K. N. & Blumstein, S. E. (1978). Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. JASA 64. 13581368.
Swingley, Daniel (2003). Phonetic detail in the developing lexicon. Language and Speech 46. 265294.
Swingley, Daniel (2005). 11-month-olds’ knowledge of how familiar words sound. Developmental Science 8. 432443.
Swingley, Daniel (2010). Fast mapping and slow mapping in children's word learning. Language Learning and Development 6. 179183.
Swingley, Daniel & Aslin, Richard N. (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition 76. 147166.
Swingley, Daniel & Aslin, Richard N. (2002). Lexical neighborhoods and word-form representations of 14-month-olds. Psychological Science 13. 480484.
Van de Velde, Hans & van Hout, Roeland (2001). The devoicing of fricatives in a reading task. In van der Wouden, Ton & Broekhuis, Hans (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 219229.
Vihman, Marilyn M., Nakai, Satsuki, DePaolis, Rory A. & Hallé, Pierre A. (2004). The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language 50. 336353.
Werker, Janet F. (1995). Exploring developmental changes in cross-language speech perception. In Gleitman, Lila R. & Liberman, Mark (eds.) Language. 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 87106.
Werker, Janet F. & Curtin, Suzanne (2005). PRIMIR: a developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development 1. 197234.
Werker, Janet F., Fennell, Christopher T., Corcoran, Kathleen M. & Stager, Christine L. (2002). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy 3. 130.
White, Katherine S. & Morgan, James L. (2008). Sub-segmental detail in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language 59. 114132.
Yoshida, Katherine A., Fennell, Christopher T., Swingley, Daniel & Werker, Janet F. (2009). Fourteen-month-old infants learn similar sounding words. Developmental Science 12. 412418.
Zamuner, Tania S. (2006). Sensitivity to word-final phonotactics in 9- to 16-month-old infants. Infancy 10. 7795.
Zink, Inge & Lejaegere, Maryline (2002). N-CDIs: lijsten voor communicatieve ontwikkeling. Aanpassing en hernormering van de MacArthur CDIs van Fenson et al. Leuven: Acco.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Building phonological lexical representations*

  • Suzanne V. H. van der Feest (a1) and Paula Fikkert (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.