Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T19:50:57.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Causal Processes in the Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Michael R. Dietrich  and
Roberta L. Millstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The neutral and nearly neutral theories of molecular evolution are sometimes characterized as theories about drift alone, where drift is described solely as an outcome, rather than a process. We argue, however, that both selection and drift, as causal processes, are integral parts of both theories. However, the nearly neutral theory explicitly recognizes alleles and/or molecular substitutions that, while engaging in weakly selected causal processes, exhibit outcomes thought to be characteristic of random drift. A narrow focus on outcomes obscures the significant role of weakly selected causal processes in the nearly neutral theory.

Type
The Role of Causal Explanations in Understanding Natural Selection
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 75 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2006 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers. Edited by Cristina Bicchieri and Jason Alexander , December 2008 , pp. 548 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beatty, John (1984), “Chance and Natural Selection”, Chance and Natural Selection 51:183–211.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. (2005), “The Difference between Selection and Drift: A Reply to Millstein”, The Difference between Selection and Drift: A Reply to Millstein 20 (1): 153–170..Google Scholar
Crow, James F. (1969), “Molecular Genetics and Population Genetics”, Molecular Genetics and Population Genetics 3:105–113.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Michael R. (1994), “The Origins of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution”, The Origins of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution 27:21–59.Google ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, Michael R. (1998), “Paradox and Persuasion: Negotiating the Place of Molecular Evolution within Evolutionary Biology”, Paradox and Persuasion: Negotiating the Place of Molecular Evolution within Evolutionary Biology 31:85–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Dover, Gabriel (1997), “There's More to Life than Selection and Neutrality”, There's More to Life than Selection and Neutrality 19:91–93.Google Scholar
Ewens, Warren (1972), “The Sampling Theory of Selectively Neutral Alleles”, The Sampling Theory of Selectively Neutral Alleles 3:87–112.Google ScholarPubMed
Fay, Justin, Wyckoff, Gerald, and Wu, Chung-I (2002), “Testing the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution with Genomic Data from Drosophila,” Nature 415:1024–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, John (1991), The Causes of Molecular Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartl, Daniel, and Dykhuizen, Daniel (1981), “Potential for Selection among Nearly Neutral Allozymes of 6-Phosphogluconate Dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli”, Potential for Selection among Nearly Neutral Allozymes of 6-Phosphogluconate Dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli 78:6344–6348.Google ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Motoo (1968a), “Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level”, Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level 217:624–626.Google Scholar
Kimura, Motoo (1968b), “Genetic Variability Maintained in a Finite Population Due to Mutational Production of Neutral and Nearly Neutral Isoalleles”, Genetic Variability Maintained in a Finite Population Due to Mutational Production of Neutral and Nearly Neutral Isoalleles 11:247–269.Google Scholar
Kimura, Motoo (1983), The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Motoo, and Ohta, Tomoko (1971), “Protein Polymorphism as a Phase in Molecular Evolution”, Protein Polymorphism as a Phase in Molecular Evolution 229:467–469.Google ScholarPubMed
King, Jack L., and Jukes, Thomas H. (1969), “Non-Darwinian Evolution”, Non-Darwinian Evolution 164:788–798.Google ScholarPubMed
Kreitman, Martin (1996), “The Neutral Theory Is Dead: Long Live the Neutral Theory,” Bioessays 18:678–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreitman, Martin (2000), “Methods to Detect Selection in Populations with Application to the Human”, Methods to Detect Selection in Populations with Application to the Human 1:539–559.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1974), The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. (2002), “Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?”, Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct? 17:33–53.Google Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. (2005), “Selection vs. Drift: A Response to Brandon's Reply”, Selection vs. Drift: A Response to Brandon's Reply 20:171–175.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra, and Dietrich, Michael R. (2006), “Integration without Unification: An Argument for Pluralism in the Biological Sciences”, Integration without Unification: An Argument for Pluralism in the Biological Sciences 168 (December): S73–S79.Google ScholarPubMed
Nei, Masatoshi (2005), “Selectionism and Neutralism in Molecular Evolution”, Selectionism and Neutralism in Molecular Evolution 22:2318–2342.Google ScholarPubMed
Ohta, Tomoko (1973), “Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution”, Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution 246:96–98.Google Scholar
Ohta, Tomoko (1974), “Mutational Pressure as the Main Cause of Molecular Evolution and Polymorphism”, Mutational Pressure as the Main Cause of Molecular Evolution and Polymorphism 252:351–354.Google Scholar
Ohta, Tomoko (1992), “The Nearly Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution”, The Nearly Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution 23:263–286.Google Scholar
Ohta, Tomoko (2000), “Mechanisms of Molecular Evolution”, Mechanisms of Molecular Evolution 355:1623–1626.Google ScholarPubMed
Ohta, Tomoko (2002), “Near-Neutrality in Evolution of Genes and Gene Regulation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:16134–16137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohta, Tomoko, and Gillespie, John (1996), “Development of Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories”, Development of Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories 49:128–142Google ScholarPubMed
Pfeifer, Jessica (2005), “Why Selection and Drift Might Be Distinct”, Why Selection and Drift Might Be Distinct 72:1135–1145.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall (1955), “Classification of the Factors of Evolution”, Classification of the Factors of Evolution 20:16–24D.Google ScholarPubMed