Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:38:57.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergent Physics and Micro-Ontology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Margaret Morrison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines ontological/dynamical aspects of emergence, specifically the micro-macro relation in cases of universal behavior. I discuss superconductivity as an emergent phenomenon, showing why microphysical features such as Cooper pairing are not necessary for deriving characteristic properties such as infinite conductivity. I claim that the difficulties surrounding the thermodynamic limit in explaining phase transitions can be countered by showing how renormalization group techniques facilitate an understanding of the physics behind the mathematics, enabling us to clarify epistemic and ontological aspects of emergence. I close with a discussion of the impact of these issues for questions concerning natural kinds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 141 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council for research support. I would also like to thank Bob Batterman, Sorin Bangu, Paul Humphreys, John Norton, and three anonymous referees for extremely helpful comments.

References

Anderson, Philip W. 1972. “More Is Different.” Science 177:393–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bangu, Sorin. 2009. “Understanding Thermodynamic Singularities: Phase Transitions, Data, and Phenomena.” Philosophy of Science 76:488–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardeen, John, Cooper, Leon N., and Schrieffer, J. Robert. 1957. “Theory of Superconductivity.” Physical Review 108:1175–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batterman, Robert. 2002. The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction and Emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Batterman, Robert. 2011. “Emergence, Singularities and Symmetry Breaking.” Foundations of Physics 41:1031–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckermann, Ansgar, Flohr, Hans, and Kim, Jaegwon. 1992. Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism. Berlin: deGruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, Craig. 2001. “Taking Thermodynamics Too Seriously.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32:539–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1970. “Mental Events.” In Experience and Theory, ed. Foster, L. and Swanson, J. W., 79–101. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Earman, John. 2004. “Curie's Principle and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18:173–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Don. 2007. “Reduction and Emergence in the Physical Sciences: Some Lessons from the Particle Physics and Condensed Matter Debate.” In Evolution and Emergence: Systems, Organisms, Persons, ed. Murphy, Nancey and Stoeger, William R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Paul. 1997a. “Emergence not Supervenience.” Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): S337–S345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Paul. 1997b. “How Properties Emerge.” Philosophy of Science 64:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon. 1992. “‘Downward Causation’ in Emergentism and Nonreductive Physicalism.” In Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism, ed. Beckermann, Ansgar, Flohr, Hans, and Kim, Jaegwon, 119–38. Berlin: deGruyter.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Robert B. 1999. “Nobel Lecture: Fractional Quantization.” Reviews of Modern Physics 71:863–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughlin, Robert B., and Pines, David. 2000. “The Theory of Everything.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 97:28–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, Margaret. 2007. “Where Have All the Theories Gone?” Philosophy of Science 74:195–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Margaret. 2008. “Models as Representational Structures.” In The Philosophy of Nancy Cartwright, ed. Bovens, Luc, Hartmann, Stephan, and Hoefer, Carl, 67–88. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rueger, Alexander. 2000. “Physical Emergence, Diachronic and Synchronic.” Synthese 124:297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silberstein, Michael, and McGeever, John. 1999. “The Search for Ontological Emergence.” Philosophical Quarterly 49:182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Steven. 1986. “Superconductivity for Particular Theorists.” Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 86:43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Steven. 1996. The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 1, Modern Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Kenneth G. 1983. “The Renormalization Group and Critical Phenomena.” Reviews of Modern Physics 47:583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar