Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:49:57.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bayesianism and Unification: A Reply to Wayne Myrvold*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Marc Lange
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Myrvold (2003) has proposed an attractive Bayesian account of why theories that unify phenomena tend to derive greater epistemic support from those phenomena than do theories that fail to unify them. It is argued, however, that “unification” in Myrvold's sense is both too easy and too difficult for theories to achieve. Myrvold's account fails to capture what it is that makes unification sometimes count in a theory's favor.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 205 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fitelson, Branden (1999), “The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity”, The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity 66 (Proceedings): S362–378.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson (1983), Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, Robert (1915), “A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck's ‘h’”, A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck's ‘h’ 7:355–388.Google Scholar
Millikan, Robert (1917), The Electron. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Myrvold, Wayne (2003), “A Bayesian Account of the Virtue of Unification”, A Bayesian Account of the Virtue of Unification 70:399–423.Google Scholar
Pais, Abraham (1982), Subtle is the Lord. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, S. William, and Wells, Benjamin B. (1953), “Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review of the Literature”, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review of the Literature 23:139–160.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley (1975), “Confirmation and Relevance”, in Feigl, Herbert and Maxwell, Grover (eds.), Induction, Probability, and Confirmation, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 6. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–36.Google Scholar
Sanders, Lisa (2003), “Diagnosis”, The New York Times Magazine, July 20, 2003, 11–14.Google Scholar
Sciama, Dennis W. (1983), “The Role of Particle Physics in Cosmology and Galactic Astronomy”, in Abell, George O. and Chincarini, Guido L. (eds.), Early Evolution of the Universe and its Present Structure. Dordrecht: Reidel, 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuewer, Roger H. (1970), “Non-Einsteinian Interpretations of the Photoelectric Effect”, in Stuewer, Roger H. (ed.), Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 246–263.Google Scholar
Winslow, William A., Ploss, Lester N., and Loitman, Bernard (1958), “Pleuritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Its Importance as an Early Manifestation in Diagnosis”, Pleuritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Its Importance as an Early Manifestation in Diagnosis 49:70–88.Google ScholarPubMed