Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:21:52.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State, Power, Anarchism

A Discussion of The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Carol J. Greenhouse
Carol J. Greenhouse
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Princeton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. By James C. Scott. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. 464p. $35.00.

The book under discussion is James C. Scott's latest contribution to the study of agrarian politics, culture, and society, and to the ways that marginalized communities evade or resist projects of state authority. The book offers a synoptic history of Upland Southeast Asia, a 2.5 million–kilometer region of hill country spanning Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Burma, and China. It offers a kind of “area study.” It also builds on Scott's earlier work on “hidden transcripts” of subaltern groups and on “seeing like a state.” The book raises many important theoretical questions about research methods and social inquiry, the relationship between political science and anthropology, the nature of states, and of modernity more generally. The book is also deeply relevant to problems of “state-building” and “failed states” in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, and Somalia. As Scott writes, “The huge literature on state-making, contemporary and historic, pays virtually no attention to its obverse: the history of deliberate and reactive statelessness. This is the history of those who got away, and state-making cannot be understood apart from it. This is also what makes it an anarchist history” (p. x).

In this symposium, I have invited a number of prominent political and social scientists to comment on the book, its historical narrative, and its broader theoretical implications for thinking about power, state failure, state-building, and foreign policy. How does the book shed light on the limits of states and the modes of resistance to state authority? Are there limits, theoretical and normative, to this “anarchist” understanding of governance and the “art of being governed”?

—Jeffrey C. Isaac, Editor

Type
Review Symposium: State, Power, Anarchism
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 88 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Philip. 1988. “Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State (1977).” Journal of Historical Sociology 1 (1): 58–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 2001. “Grassroots Globalization in the Research Imagination.” In Globalization, ed. Appadurai, Arjun. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Thomas. 2002. “Introduction: Historians, the Nation, and the Plenitude of Narratives.” In Rethinking American History in a Global Age, ed. Bender, Thomas. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John L., and Comaroff, Jean. 2006a. “Preface.” In Law and Disorder in the Postcolony, ed. Comaroff, John and Comaroff, Jean. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, John L., and Comaroff, Jean. 2006b. “Law and Disorder in the Postcolony: An Introduction.” In Law and Disorder in the Postcolony, ed. Comaroff, John and Comaroff, Jean. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coronil, Fernando. 1997. The Magical State: Nature, Money, and Modernity in Venezuela. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Philip, and Sayer, Derek. 1985. The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 2009. “Spectres of Transnationalism: Changing Terrains of Sociology of Law.” Journal of Law and Society 36 (4): 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutin, Susan Bibler. 2007. Nations of Emigrants: Shifting Boundaries of Citizenship in El Salvador and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James, and Gupta, Akhil. 2002. “Spatializing States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality.” American Ethnologist 29 (4): 981–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, Sujatha. 2010. Who Can Stop the Drums? Urban Social Movements in Chavez's Venezuela. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (2): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Nancy L., and Weil, Francois, eds. 2007. Citizenship and Those Who Leave: The Politics of Emigration and Expatriation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J., ed. 2009. Ethnographies of Neoliberalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gustafson, Bret. 2009. New Languages of the State: Indigenous Resurgence and the Politics of Knowledge in Bolivia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Thomas, and Stepputat, Finn, eds. 2001. States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Post-Colonial State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David. 2009. Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2007. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paley, Julia. 2001. Marketing Democracy: Power and Social Movements in Post-Dictatorship Chile. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 2001. The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 2008. “Real Time: Unwinding Technocratic and Anthropological Knowledge.” American Ethnologist 31 (3): 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 2007. A Sociology of Globalization. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. 2008. “The Age of Responsibilization: On Market-Embedded Morality.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2004. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Kay. 1998. Indigenous Movements and Their Critics: Pan-Maya Activism in Guatemala. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1954. Law, Economy and Society, ed. Rheinstein, Max. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weil, François. 2000. “Les migrants français aux Ameriques (19e et 20e siecles), nouvel objet d'histoire.” Annales de Demographie Historique 2000 (1): 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White House. 2002. “The National Security Strategy.” http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/nsc/nss/2002 (accessed July 17, 2010).Google Scholar