Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Article

A Discussion of Kathryn Sikkink's Evidence for Hope: Making Human Rights Work in the 21st Century

  • Emilie Hafner-Burton (a1)

Abstract

Since their emergence in the late eighteenth century, doctrines of universal individual rights have been variously criticized as philosophically confused, politically inefficacious, ideologically particular, and Eurocentric. Nevertheless, today the discourse of universal human rights is more internationally widespread and influential than ever. In Evidence for Hope, leading international relations scholar Kathryn Sikkink argues that this is because human rights laws and institutions work. Sikkink rejects the notion that human rights are a Western imposition and points to a wide range of evidence that she claims demonstrates the effectiveness of human rights in bringing about a world that is appreciably improved in many ways from what it was previously. We have invited a broad range of scholars to assess Sikkink’s challenging claims.

Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © American Political Science Association 2019 

References

Hide All
Camp, Keith. 1999. “The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does It Make a Difference in Human Rights Behavior?” Journal of Peace Research 36(1): 95–118.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2013. Making Human Rights a Reality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Ron, James. 2009. “Seeing Double: Human Rights Impact through Qualitative and Quantitative Eyes?” World Politics 61(2): 360–401.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Ron, James. 2013. “The Latin Bias: Regions, the Anglo-American Media and Human Rights, 1981–2000.” International Studies Quarterly 57(3): 474–91.
Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” Faculty Scholarship Series. 839. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/839.
Heyns, Christof and Viljoen, Frans. 2001. “The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level.” Human Rights Quarterly 23(3): 483–535.
Hopgood, Stephen. 2013. The Endtimes of Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lupu, Yon. 2013. “The Informative Power of Treaty Commitment: Using the Spatial Model to Address Selection Effects.” American Journal of Political Science 57(4): 912–25.
MacRae, Katherine. 2016. “Does It Lead if It Bleeds? An Analysis of Toronto Newspapers and Their Coverage of Trauma-Related Events.” Master’s thesis, Department of Journalism, Concordia University, Montreal.
Pooley, Eric. 1989. “Grins, Gore, and Videotape: The Trouble with Local TV News.” New York Magazine.
Posner, Eric. 2014. The Twilight of Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ron, James. 2017. “Introduction.” Special issue, “Public Opinion Polling & Human Rights.” Journal of Human Rights 16(3): 257–60.
Ron, James, Golden, Shannon, Crow, David, and Pandya, Archana. 2017. Taking Root: Human Rights and Public Opinion in the Global South. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ron, James, Ramos, Howard, and Rodgers, Kathleen. 2005. “Transnational Information Politics: NGO Human Rights Reporting, 1986–2000.” International Studies Quarter 49(3): 557–87.
Simmons, Beth. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

A Discussion of Kathryn Sikkink's Evidence for Hope: Making Human Rights Work in the 21st Century

  • Emilie Hafner-Burton (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed