Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-6pznq Total loading time: 0.473 Render date: 2021-03-05T11:27:41.290Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Seeing Like an Autocrat: Liberal Social Engineering in an Illiberal State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2015

Abstract

Recent studies of autocratic liberalization adopt a rationalist approach in which autocrats’ motives and styles of reasoning are imputed or deduced. By contrast, I investigate these empirically. I focus on liberal social engineering in the Persian Gulf, where authoritarian state efforts to shape citizen hearts and minds conform incongruously to liberal ideals of character. To explain this important but under-studied variant on autocratic liberalization, I present evidence from rare palace ethnography in the United Arab Emirates, including analysis of the jokes and stories ruling elites tell behind closed doors and regular interviews with a ruling monarch. I find that autocrats’ deeply personal experiences in the West as young men and women supplied them with stylized ideas about how modern, productive peoples ought to act and how their own cultures underperform. The evidence also reveals that such experiences can influence autocrats, even years later, leading them to trust in Western-style liberal social engineering as the way forward, despite the risks. Ethnographic findings challenge the contemporary scholarly stereotype of the autocrat as a super-rational being narrowly focused on political survival, illustrating how memory and emotion can also serve as important influences over reasoning and can drive liberal change.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Aarts, Paul, and Nonneman, Gerd, eds. 2005. Saudi Arabia in the Balance: Political Economy, Society, Foreign Affairs. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Ali, Syed. 2010. Dubai: Gilded Cage. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Almezaini, Khalid S. 2012. The UAE and Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid, Identities and Interests. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Art, David. 2012. “What Do We Know about Authoritarianism after Ten Years?Comparative Politics 44(3): 351–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayalon, Ami. 2000. “Post-Ottoman Arab Monarchies: Old Bottles, New Labels?” In Middle Eastern Monarchies: The Challenge of Modernity, ed. Kostiner., Joseph Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Beasley, William G. 1972. The Meiji Restoration. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Beblawi, Hazem, and Luciani, Giacomo. 1987. The Rentier State. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa. 2010. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Smith, Alastair. 2011. The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior Is Almost Always Good Politics. PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Bundhun, Rebecca. 2010. “Jewels of Saadiyat Emerging.” The National, November 26. http://www.thenational.ae/business/travel-tourism/jewels-of-saadiyat-emerging, accessed September 22, 2014.Google Scholar
Callan, Eamonn, and White, John. 2002. “Liberalism and Communitarianism.” In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education, eds. Blake, Nigel, Smeyers, Paul, Smith, Richard, and Standish, Paul. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Cambanis, Thanassis. 2007. “Saudi King Tries to Grow Modern Ideas in Desert.” New York Times, October 26.Google Scholar
Centeno, Miguel A., and Silva, Patricio. 1998. The Politics of Expertise in Latin America. Houndmills: Macmillan Press Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhry, Kiren Aziz. 1997. The Price of Wealth: Economies and Institutions in the Middle East. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, Jill. 1990. Oil and Politics in the Gulf: Rulers and Merchants in Kuwait and Qatar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, John, and Nordenbo, Sven Erik. 2002. “Progressivism.” In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education, eds. Blake, Nigel, Smeyers, Paul, Smith, Richard, and Standish, Paul. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Davidson, Christopher M. 2005. The United Arab Emirates: A Study in Survival. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Davidson, Christopher M. 2012. After the Sheikhs: The Coming Collapse of the Gulf Monarchies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray J. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Egorov, Georgy, Guriev, Sergei, and Sonin, Konstantin. 2009. “Why Resource-Poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data.” American Political Science Review 103(4): 645–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eickelman, Dale. 2001. “Kings and People: Information and Authority in Oman, Qatar and the Persian Gulf.” In Iran, Iraq, and the Arab Gulf States, ed. Kechichian., John New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. “Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism.” International Organization 50(2): 325–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52(4): 887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2009. “Elections under Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gause, F. Gregory. 1994. Oil Monarchies: Domestic and Security Challenges in the Arab Gulf States. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Susan H. 2001. “Opening Minds: The International Liberal Education Movement.” World Policy Journal 18(4): 7989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, John. 2005. Al Qaeda and What It Means to Be Modern. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Heard-Bey, Frauke. 1982. From Trucial States to United Arab Emirates: A Society in Transition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Heater, Derek Benjamin. 2004. A History of Education for Citizenship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henry, Clement Moore, and Springborg, Robert. 2010. Globalization and the Politics of Development in the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herb, Michael. 1999. All in the Family: Absolutism, Revolution, and Democracy in the Middle Eastern Monarchies. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Herb, Michael. 2009. “A Nation of Bureaucrats: Political Participation and Economic Diversification in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 41(3): 375–95.Google Scholar
Herf, Jeffrey. 1984. Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hertog, Steffen. 2010. Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats: Oil and the State in Saudi Arabia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Calvert W. 2014. “Outsourcing the Nation: Networks of Foreign Experts in the Arabian Peninsula.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., August 2831.
Kamrava, Mehran. 2013. Qatar: Small State, Big Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kanna, Ahmed. 2011. Dubai, the City as Corporation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenez, Peter. 1985. The Birth of the Propaganda State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leheny, David Richard. 2003. The Rules of Play: National Identity and the Shaping of Japanese Leisure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longva, Anh Nga. 2005. “Neither Autocracy nor Democracy but Ethnocracy: Citizens, Expatriates and the Socio-Political System in Kuwait.” In Monarchies and Nations: Globalisation and Identity in the Arab States of the Gulf., ed. Dresch, Paul and Piscatori, James. New York: Tauris.Google Scholar
Lorentzen, Peter L. 2013. “Regularizing Rioting: Permitting Public Protest in an Authoritarian Regime.” International Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8(2): 127–58.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 1990. Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacMullen, Ian. 2013. “Civics beyond Critics: Character Education in a Liberal Democracy.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, August 29-September 1.
Mahdavy, Hussein. 1970. “Patterns and Problems of Economic Development in Rentier States: The Case of Iran.” In Studies in Economic History of the Middle East, ed. Cook., M. A. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52(4): 943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markey, Daniel Seth. 2000. “The Prestige Motive in International Relations.” Ph. D. diss., Princeton University.
McDermott, Rose. 2004. “The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscientific Advances for Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 691706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2005. “Rationality and Psychology in International Politics.” International Organization 59(1): 77106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2010. “Emotional Beliefs.” International Organization 64(1): 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O.. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, Abbas. 2011. The Shah. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mosse, George L. 1975. The Nationalization of the Masses: Political Symbolism and Mass Movements in Germany from the Napoleonic Wars through the Third Reich. New York: H. Fertig.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 2013. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Okruhlik, Gwenn. 1999. “Rentier Wealth, Unruly Law, and the Rise of Opposition: The Political Economy of Oil States.” Comparative Politics 31(3): 295315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachirat, Timothy. 2009. “The Political in Political Ethnography: Dispatches from the Kill Floor.” In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, ed. Schatz., Edward Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Paumgarten, Nick. 2006. “Deerfield in the Desert.” The New Yorker, September 4. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/09/04/deerfield-in-the-desert, accessed September 22, 2014.Google Scholar
Pearlman, Wendy. 2013. “Emotions and the Microfoundations of the Arab Uprisings.” Perspectives on Politics 11(2): 387409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, J. E. 2006. “Qatar and the World: Branding for a Micro-State.” The Middle East Journal 60(4): 732–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Susan L. 2005. “Re-imagining and Rescripting the Future of Education: Global Knowledge Economy Discourses and the Challenge to Education Systems.” Comparative Education 41(2): 151–70.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward. 2009a. “What Kind(s) of Ethnography Does Political Science Need?” In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, ed. Schatz., Edward Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, Edward. 2009b. “Ethnographic Immersion and the Study of Politics.” In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, ed. Schatz., Edward Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, Edward., ed. 2009c. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwedler, Jillian. 2006. “The Third Gender: Western Female Researchers in the Middle East.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39(3): 425–28.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shehata, Samer. 2006. “Ethnography, Identity, and the Production of Knowledge.” In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, ed. Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. Armonk, NY: M.E.Sharpe.Google Scholar
Siegelbaum, Lewis H. 1988. Stakhanovism and the Politics of Productivity in the USSR, 1935–1941. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2006. “Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism.” International Organization 60(4): 781810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tétreault, Mary Ann. 2000. Stories of Democracy: Politics and Society in Contemporary Kuwait. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tétreault, Mary Ann. 2010. “Great Expectations: Western-Style Education in the Gulf States.” In Industrialization in the Gulf: A Socioeconomic Revolution, ed. Seznec, Jean-François and Kirk., Mimi London: Routledge.Google Scholar
UAE Cabinet. 2010. “UAE Vision 2021: United in Ambition and Determination.” http://www.vision2021.ae/en, accessed September 22, 2014.
UAE Ministry of Education and Youth. 1999. “Education Vision 2020: Pillars, Strategic Objectives, Projects and Implementation Programs for UAE Education Development.” http://doc.iiep.unesco.org/cgi-bin/wwwi32.exe/%5Bin=epidoc1.in%5D/?t2000=016586/(100), accessed online on October 21, 2014.
Ulrichsen, Kristian Coates. 2011. “Repositioning the GCC States in the Changing Global Order.” Journal of Arabian Studies 1(2): 231–47.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme. 2003. Building a Knowledge Society: The Arab Human Development Report. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
Van Der Meulen, Hendrik. 1997. “The Role of Tribal and Kinship Ties in the Politics of the United Arab Emirates.” Ph. D. diss., Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University.
Venkatesh, Sudhir. 2002. “‘Doin’ the Hustle’: Constructing the Ethnographer in the American Ghetto.” Ethnography 3(1): 91111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Ezra F. 2011. Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vora, Neha. 2013. Impossible Citizens: Dubai’s Indian Diaspora. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. [1997]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2008. Peripheral Visions: Publics, Power, and Performance in Yemen. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2010. “Reflections on Ethnographic Work in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Jessica Chen. 2013. “Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China.” International Organization 67(1): 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanow, Dvora. 1996. How Does a Policy Mean? Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Yong. 2012. World Class Learners: Educating Creative and Entrepreneurial Students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 52
Total number of PDF views: 559 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 5th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Seeing Like an Autocrat: Liberal Social Engineering in an Illiberal State
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Seeing Like an Autocrat: Liberal Social Engineering in an Illiberal State
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Seeing Like an Autocrat: Liberal Social Engineering in an Illiberal State
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *