Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2015

Abstract

Much research in the study of U.S. politics has argued that female candidates for elected office are treated differently—and often worse—than male candidates in the press and by the public. Although these patterns do not doom women to electoral failure, they raise a formidable series of obstacles that often complicate women’s path to elective office, slowing the move toward gender parity in representation. Broad changes to the American political landscape, as well as methodological limitations of previous work, however, suggest the need for an updated assessment. We rely on a detailed content analysis of local newspaper coverage from nearly 350 U.S. House districts and nationally representative survey data from the 2010 midterms to provide a comprehensive evaluation of whether women experience a more hostile campaign environment than do men. We find that candidate sex does not affect journalists’ coverage of, or voters’ attitudes toward, the women and men running for office in their districts. Rather, reporters’ portrayals and citizens’ assessments of candidates stem primarily from partisanship, ideology, and incumbency, not the sex of the candidate. Although our results differ from much of the existing literature, we regard them as a valuable point of departure for answering pressing questions about gender and representation in contemporary politics, both in an American and comparative context.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Alexander, Deborah, and Andersen, Kristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46(3): 527–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Berry, Christopher R.. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 478–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banwart, Mary Christine, Bystrom, Diane G., and Robertson, Terry A.. 2003. “From the Primary to the General Election: A Comparative Analysis of Candidate Media Coverage in Mixed Gender 2000 Races for Governor and U.S. Senate.” American Behavioral Scientist 46(5): 658–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1956–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole. N.d. “Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support for Female Candidates.” Political Psychology, forthcoming.
Bennett, W. Lance. 2009. News: The Politics of Illusion. 8th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Braden, Maria. 1996. Women Politicians in the Media. Lexington: University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2011. “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians.” Journal of Politics 73(2):5 97615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. “Campaign Finance: Women’s Experience in the Modern Era.” In Women and Elective Office, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox., Clyde New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bystrom, Dianne G., Christine Banwart, Mary, Lee Kaid, Lynda, and Robertson, Terry A.. 2004. Gender and Candidate Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Carli, Linda L., and Eagly, Alice H.. 2012. “Leadership and Gender.” In The Nature of Leadership, 2nd ed., ed. Day, David V. and Antonakis, John. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Carlin, Diana B., and Winfrey, Kelly L.. 2009. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage.” Communication Studies 60(4): 326–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 2009. “Reflections on Gender and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: The Good, the Bad, and the Misogynic.” Politics & Gender 5(1): 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan, and Schreiber, Ronnee. 1997. “Media Coverage of Women in the 103rd Congress.” In Women, Media and Politics, ed. Norris., Pippa New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Politics & Gender 4(4): 522–30.Google Scholar
Clarke, Peter, and Evans, Susan H.. 1983. Covering Campaigns: Journalism in Congressional Elections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth Adell. 1998. “Voter Reaction to Women Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox., Clyde New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Timothy E. 2005. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabelko, , La Cour, Kirsten, and Herrnson, Paul S.. 1997. “Women’s and Men’s Campaigns for the US House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 50(1): 121–35.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darcy, Robert, Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation, 2nd ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Delli, Carpini, Michael, X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DeSilver, Drew. 2014. “Facebook Is a News Source for Many, but Only Incidentally.” Pew Research Center, February 4. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/04/facebook-is-a-news-source-for-many-but-only-incidentally/, accessed August 5, 2014.
Devitt, James. 1999. “Framing Gender on the Campaign Trail: Women’s Executive Leadership and the Press.” Monograph. New York: Women’s Leadership Fund.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L. 1998. “Representing Women’s Interests in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In Women and Elective Office, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox., Clyde New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 272–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32(1): 6988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates: What Really Matters?Political Research Quarterly 67(1): 96107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2009. “Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes toward Gender Balance in Government.” American Politics Research 37(May): 409–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?American Political Science Review 96(4): 729–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2004. “Priming the Vote.” Political Psychology 25(4): 577–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N 2005. “Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters.” Political Communication 22(4): 463–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 1998. “The Bottleneck, Women as Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox., Clyde New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunaway, Johanna, Lawrence, Regina G., Rose, Melody, and Weber, Chris. 2013. “Traits versus Issues: News Coverage of Female Candidates for Senatorial and Gubernatorial Office.” Political Research Quarterly 66(3): 715–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Carli, Linda L.. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press Brooks.Google Scholar
Falk, Erika, and Kenski, Kate. 2006. “Issue Saliency and Gender Stereotypes: Support for Women as Presidents in Times of War and Terrorism.” Social Science Quarterly 87(1): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2006. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Fowler, Linda L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2009. “Looking for Sex in All the Wrong Places: Press Coverage and the Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Candidates.” Perspectives on Politics 7(3): 519–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L. 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L. 2010. “Congressional Elections: Women’s Candidacies and the Road to Gender Parity.” In Gender and Elections, 2nd ed., ed. Carroll, Susan J. and Fox, Richard L.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2014. “Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition.” American Political Science Review 108(3): 499519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Oxley, Zoe. 2003. “Gender Stereotyping in State Executive Elections: Candidate Selection and Success.” Journal of Politics 65(3): 833–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2008. “Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4(3): 393425.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles. 2007. “Pres08: Is Anyone Paying Attention? You Bet!Pollster, July 31. http://www.pollster.com/blogs/pres08_is_anyone_paying_attent.php?nr=1, accessed August 5, 2014.Google Scholar
Frederick, Brian. 2009. “Are Female House Members Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship between Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Congress & the Presidency 36(2): 181202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2009. “The Role of Gender Stereotypes in U.S. Senate Campaigns.” Politics & Gender 5(3):301–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2011. “The Role of Candidate Traits in Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 73(1): 6173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, Sarah A. 2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65(2): 303–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup. 2012. “Atheists, Muslims See Most Bias as Presidential Candidates.” http://www.gallup.com/poll/155285/Atheists-Muslims-Bias-Presidential-Candidates.aspx, accessed April 24, 2014.
General Social Survey. 2010. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Council.
Gerrity, Jessica C., Osborn, Tracy, and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2007. “Women and Representation: A Different View of the District?Politics & Gender 3(2): 179200.Google Scholar
Gershon, Sarah. 2012. “When Race, Gender, and the Media Intersect: Campaign News Coverage of Minority Congresswomen.” Journal of Women, Politics, & Policy 33(2): 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Everitt, Joanna. 2003. “Talking Tough: Gender and Reported Speech in Campaign News Coverage.” Political Communication 20: 209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, Edie, and Traugott, Michael. 1984. Campaigning for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 2010. Mass Media and American Politics, 8th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G., McGhee, Debbie E., and Schwartz, Jordan L. K.. 1998. “Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6): 1464–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gronke, Paul. 2001. The Electorate, the Campaign, and the Office: A Unified Approach to Senate and House Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 908–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2010. “The Dynamics of Agenda Convergence and the Paradox of Competitiveness in Presidential Campaigns.” Political Research Quarterly 63(3): 594611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7(2): 133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny, Lawless, Jennifer L., and Baitinger, Gail. 2014. “Who Cares What They Wear? Media, Gender, and the Influence of Candidate Appearance.” Social Science Quarterly 95(5): 11941212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Roseanna, Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie, and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle. 2005. “Women on the Sidelines: Women’s Representation on Committees in Latin American Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 420–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 619–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heldman, Caroline, Carroll, Susan J., and Olson, Stephanie. 2005. “She Brought Only a Skirt: Print Media Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Bid for the Republican Presidential Nomination.” Political Communication 22(3): 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Mondak, Jeffery J., Craw, Michael, and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2005. “Making Sense of Candidates: Partisanship, Ideology, and Issues as Guides to Judgment.” Cognitive Brain Research 23(1): 1123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huddy, Leonie, and Capelos, Theresa. 2002. “Gender Stereotyping and Candidate Evaluation: Good News and Bad News for Women Politicians.” In The Social Psychology of Politics, ed. Ottati, Victor C., Scott Tindale, R., Edwards, John, Bryant, Fred B., Health, Linda, O’Connell, Daniel C., Suarez-Balzacar, Yolanda, and Posavac., Emil J. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Carey, Tony E. Jr. 2009. “Group Politics Redux: Race and Gender in the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primaries.” Politics & Gender 5(1): 8196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Feldman, Stanley. 2009. “On Assessing the Political Effects of Racial Prejudice.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 423–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2014. “Women in National Parliaments.” http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm, accessed August 3, 2014.
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Guarav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 405–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2012. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 8th ed. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Jalalzai, Farida. 2006. “Women Candidates and the Media: 1992–2000 Elections.” Politics & Policy 34(3): 606–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1992. “Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of U.S. Senate Candidates.” Journal of Politics 54(2): 497517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1994. “Does Gender Make a Difference? An Experimental Examination of Sex Stereotypes and Press Patterns in Statewide Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 162–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Goldenberg, Edie. 1991. “Women Candidates in the News: An Examination of Gender Differences in U.S. Senate Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55(2): 180–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Kenney, Patrick J.. 1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. 2007. “Implicit Attitudes, Explicit Choices: When Subliminal Priming Predicts Candidate Preference.” Political Behavior 29(3): 343–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislatures: the Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 560–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1995. “Alternative Views of Crime: Legislative Policymaking in Gendered Terms.” Journal of Politics 57(3): 696723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. 1986. “Presidential Character Revisited.” In Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, ed. Lau, Richard R. and Sears, David O.. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
King, David C., and Matland, Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31(6): 5 95612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Fridkin, Kim. 2008. “Gender, Candidate Portrayals, and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective.” Politics & Gender 4(3): 371–92.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?Journal of Politics 62(2): 414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasno, Jonathan S. 1997. Challengers, Competition, and Reelection: Comparing Senate and House Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Krieg, Gregory J. 2014. “Hillary Clinton: Media Promotes ‘Double Standard’ for Women,” ABC News – The Note, April 4, 2014. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/04/hillary-clinton-media-promotes-double-standard-for-women/ accessed April 23, 2014.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Ziva, and Spencer, Steven J.. 2003. “When Do Stereotypes Come to Mind and When Do They Color Judgment? A Goal-Based Theoretical Framework for Stereotype Activation and Application.” Psychological Bulletin 129(4): 522–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunda, Ziva, and Thagard, P.. 1996. “Forming Impressions from Stereotypes, Traits, and Behaviors: A Parallel-Constraint-Satisfaction Theory.” Psychological Review 103(2): 284308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Stephanie Greco. 2001. “Running as Women? A Comparison of Female and Male Pennsylvania Assembly Candidates’ Campaign Brochures.” Women & Politics 22: 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 951–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 53(3): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2009. “Sexism and Gender Bias in Election 2008: A More Complex Path for Women in Politics.” Politics & Gender 5(1): 7080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2012. Men Rule: The Continued Under-Representation of Women in U.S. Politics. Washington, DC: Women & Politics Institute.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. “Thex Primary Reason for Women’s Under-Representation: Re-Evaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 70(1): 6782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Regina G., and Rose, Melody. 2009. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Eric, Sides, John, and Farrell, Henry. 2010. “Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, Mark. 1991. “The Impact of Prejudice on Female Candidates: An Experimental Look at Voter Inference.” American Politics Quarterly 19(2): 248–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89(2): 309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’.” Journal of Politics 61(3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCombs, Maxwell E., and Shaw, Donald L.. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary US Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 895918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen. 2010. “It Takes a State: A Policy Feedback Model of Women’s Political Representation.” Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 6991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Melissa K., Peake, Jeffrey S., and Boulton, Brittany Anne. 2010. “Testing the Saturday Night Live Hypothesis: Fairness and Bias in Newspaper Coverage of Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign.” Politics & Gender 6(2): 169–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung. N.d. “The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters.” Political Behavior: forthcoming.
Nick, Baumann. 2010. “Is Vicky Hartzler the Most Anti-Gay Candidate in America?Mother Jones, October 20, 2010. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2010/10/vicky-hartzler-most-anti-gay-candidate-america accessed April 23, 2014.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1994. “The Impact of the Electoral System on Election of Women to National Legislatures.” In Different Roles, Different Voices, ed. Githens, Marianne, Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997a. “Introduction: Women, Media and Politics.” In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Norris., Pippa New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997b. “Women Leaders Worldwide: A Splash of Color in the Photo Op.” In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Norris., Pippa New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Osborn, Tracy L. 2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender and Representation in the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2008. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paolino, Phillip. 1995. “Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 294313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela H., Hughes, Melanie M., and Painter, Matthew A.. 2010. “Growth in Women’s Political Representation: A Longitudinal Exploration of Democracy, Electoral System and Gender Quotas.” European Journal of Political Research 49(1): 2552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40(3): 825–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel H. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 472–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Jennifer. 2013. “The Effects of Political Institutions on Women’s Political Representation: A Comparative Analysis of 168 Countries from 1992 to 2010.” Political Research Quarterly 66(2): 306–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Dean, Norma G.. 1989. “Gender Roles and Political Office: Effects of Perceived Masculinity/Femininity of Candidate and Political Office.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 13(June): 7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2003. “Political Knowledge and Gender Stereotypes.” American Politics Research 31(November): 575–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Dolan, Kathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?Political Research Quarterly 62(3): 485–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981-82. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were A Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology 2: 6183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F. 2006. “Local News Coverage and the Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. HouseLegislative Studies Quarterly 31(4): 491511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2012. “The Interplay of Gender and Party Stereotypes in Evaluating Political Candidates.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Portland, OR, March 22–24.
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology 35(2): 245–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Corbetta, Renato. 2004. “Gender Turnover and Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(2): 215–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kevin B. 1997. “When All’s Fair: Signs of Parity in Media Coverage of Female Candidates.” Political Communication 14: 7182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Aaron and Brenner, Joanna. 2012. “Twitter Use 2012.” Pew Research Internet Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/05/31/twitter-use-2012/, accessed November 21, 2014.
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2013.Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue. 1991. “Do Women Leaders Make a Difference? Substance, Style, and Perceptions.” In Gender and Policymaking: Studies of Women in Office, ed. Dodson, Debra. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Marion. 2012. Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villacorta, Natalie. 2014. “Michele Bachmann: U.S. Not Ready for Female President,” Politico, February 20, 2014. http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/michele-bachmann-female-president-103731.html, accessed April 23, 2014.Google Scholar
Vinson, Danielle C. 2003. Local Media Coverage of Congress and Its Members: Through Local Eyes. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan E., and Wittmer, Dana E.. 2013. “When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men?American Journal of Political Science 57(2): 326–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, David H. 1996. “What Voters Learn from Media.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546(1): 3447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weikart, Lynne A., Chen, Greg, Williams, Daniel W., and Hromic, Haris. 2007. “The Democratic Sex: Gender Differences and the Exercise of Power.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28(1): 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Sara J. 1996. “Women as Governors: State Executive Leadership with a Feminist Face?” In Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders, 2nd ed., ed. Lovelace Duke, Lois. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Westlye, Mark C. 1991. Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, Linda, Paget, Karen, and Matthews, Glenna. 1994. Running as a Woman. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Woods, Harriet. 2000. Stepping Up To Power: The Political Journey of American Women. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum. 2013. “Global Gender Gap Report.” http://www.weforum.org/issues/global-gender-gap, accessed August 3, 2014.

Hayes and Lawless supplementary material

Appendix

File 190 KB

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 583
Total number of PDF views: 2878 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-tvlwp Total loading time: 0.47 Render date: 2021-01-24T22:31:14.502Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *