Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T02:52:21.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Fact of Experience: Rethinking Political Knowledge and Civic Competence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2017

Abstract

In the study of political knowledge, the emphasis on facts is misplaced. Evidence has grown that predispositions and social contexts shape how individuals are exposed to and interpret facts about politics, and the ready availability of information in the contemporary media environment may exacerbate these biases. We reexamine political knowledge from the bottom up. We look at what citizens themselves treat as relevant to the task of understanding public affairs and how they use this information. We draw upon our research in three different projects involving observation of political talk and elite interviews to do so. We observe that people across a range of levels of political engagement process political information through the lens of their personal experience. Failing to acknowledge this aspect of the act of using political information presents an incomplete empirical understanding of political knowledge. We propose an Expanded Model of Civic Competence that presents an alternative interpretation for what it means to be an informed citizen in a democracy. In this model, the competence of listening to and understanding the different lived experiences of others cannot be considered separately from levels of factual knowledge.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrajano, Marisa. 2015. “Reexamining the “Racial Gap” in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 77(1): 4454.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher C. and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Althaus, Scott L. 1998. “Information Effects in Collective Preferences.” American Political Science Review 92(3): 545–58.Google Scholar
Barabas, Jason, Jerit, Jennifer, Pollock, William, and Rainey, Carlisle. 2014. “The Question(s) of Political Knowledge.” American Political Science Review 108(4): 840–55.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 194230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24(2): 117–50.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2005. “Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind.” Perspectives on Politics 3(1): 1531.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2016. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, 2d ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E. and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review 79(4): 1061–78.Google Scholar
Bolsen, Toby, Druckman, James N., and Cook, Fay Lomax. 2015. “Citizens’, Scientists’, and Policy Advisors’ Beliefs about Global Warming.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658: 271–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas and Lupu, Noam. 2015. “What Good Is a College Degree? Education and Leader Quality Reconsidered.” Journal of Politics 78(1): 3549.Google Scholar
Clifford, Scott and Jerit, Jennifer. 2016. “Cheating on Political Knowledge Questions in Online Surveys: An Assessment of the Problem and Solutions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(4): 858887.Google Scholar
Cramer, Katherine. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cramer Walsh, Katherine. 2004. Talking About Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cramer Walsh, Katherine. 2007. Talking About Race: Community Dialogues and the Politics of Disagreement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Delli, Carpini, X., Michael, and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Delli, Carpini, X., Michael, Keeter, Scott, and David Kennamer, J.. 1994. “Effects of the News Media Environment on Citizen Knowledge of State Politics and Government.” Journalism Quarterly 71(2): 443–56.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2011. “Do Women and Men Know Different Things? Measuring Gender Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 73(1): 97107.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. and Nelson, K. R. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 729–45.Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick J. and Mullin, Megan. 2012 “Turning Personal Experience into Political Attitudes: The Effect of Local Weather on Americans’ Perceptions about Global Warming” Journal of Politics 74(3): 796809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbring, Lutz, Goldenberg, Edie N., and Miller, Arthur H.. 1980. “Front-Page News and Real World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by Media.” American Journal of Political Science 24(1): 1649.Google Scholar
Eveland, William P. Jr. 2004. “The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration.” Journal of Communication 21(2): 177–93.Google Scholar
Eveland, William P., Morey, Alyssa C. and Hutchens, Myiah J.. 2011. “Beyond Deliberation: New Directions for the Study of Informal Political Conversation from a Communication Perspective.” Journal of Communication 61(6): 1082–103.Google Scholar
Fisher, Pamela. 2007. “Experiential Knowledge Challenges ‘Normality’ and Individualized Citizenship: Towards ‘Another Way of Being.’” Disability & Society 22(3): 283–298.Google Scholar
Funk, Cary and Rainie, Lee. 2015. “Attitudes and Beliefs on Science and Technology Topics.” In Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society. Pew Research Center. January 29.Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/chapter-3-attitudes-and-beliefs-on-science-and-technology-topics/ Google Scholar
Gaines, Brian, Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Peyton, Buddy, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2007. ‘‘Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq.’’ Journal of Politics 69(4): 957–74.Google Scholar
Harris-Lacewell, Melissa V. 2004. Barbershops, Bibles, and BET: Everyday Talk and Black Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2015. “As Local News Goes, So Goes Citizen Engagement: Media, Knowledge, and Participation in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 77(2): 447–62.Google Scholar
Hess, Diana E. and McAvoy, Paula. 2014. The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer L. and Einstein, Katherine Levine. 2015. Do Facts Matter? Information and Misinformation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Holbert, R. Lance, Benoit, William, Hansen, Glenn, and Wen, Wei-Chun. 2002. “The Role of Communication in the Formation of an Issue-Based Citizenry.” Communication Monographs 69(4): 296310.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Dan. 2014. “All Politics Is Presidential.” FiveThirtyEight. March 27. Available at http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/all-politics-is-presidential/ Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., Lomax Cook, Faye, and X, Michael. Carpini, Delli. 2009. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer and Barabas, Jason. 2012. “Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment.” Journal of Politics 74(3): 672–84.Google Scholar
Joslyn, Mark R. and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2014. “Who Knows Best? Education, Partisanship, and Contested Facts” Politics and Policy 42(6): 919–47.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. 1981. “Presidents, Prosperity, and Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45(1): 120.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. and Roderick Kiewiet, D.. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11(2): 129–61.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. and Sears, David O.. 1981. “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism versus Racial Threats to the Good Life.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(3): 414–31.Google Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel S. 2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 2016. Uninformed: Why People Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, Seth Levine, Adam, Menning, Jesse O., and Sin, Gisela. 2007. “Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters ‘Simply Ignorant?’ A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in ‘Homer Gets a Tax Cut.’” Perspectives on Politics 5(4): 773–84.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. and Anderson, Mary R.. 2004. “The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 66(2): 492512.Google Scholar
Motta, Matthew P., Callaghan, Timothy H., and Smith, Brianna. 2016. “Looking for Answers: Identifying Search Behavior and Improving Knowledge-Based Data Quality in Online Surveys.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Advance Access at http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/09/05/ijpor.edw027.short Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G. and Kent Jennings, M.. 1991. “Issues and Inheritance in the Formation of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 35(4): 970–88.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Erik C., Cooper, Kathryn E., and Kelly Garrett, R.. 2015. “The Partisan Brain: How Dissonant Science Messages Lead Conservatives and Liberals to (Dis)trust Science. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658: 3666.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan and Reifler, Jason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32(2): 303–30.Google Scholar
Price, Vincent, Cappella, Joseph N., and Nir, Lilach. 2002. “Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?” Political Communication 19(1): 95112.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2013. “Visual Political Knowledge: A Different Road to Competence?” Journal of Politics (76)1: 4157.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus and Lupia, Arthur. 2008. “Money, Time, and Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Quick Recall and Political Learning Skills.” American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 169–83.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus, Sood, Gaurav, and Khanna, Kabir. 2015. “You Cannot Be Serious: The Impact of Accuracy Incentives on Partisan Bias in Reports of Economic Perceptions.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10(4): 489518.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, David P., Civettini, Andrew J. W., and Emmerson, Karen M.. 2010. “The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?” Political Psychology 31(4): 563–93.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Williamson, Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe. 2000. Unwanted Claims: The Politics of Participation in the U.S. Welfare System. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe, Fording, Richard C., and Schram, Sanford F.. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Steven J., Steele, Claude M., and Quinn, Diane M.. 1999. “Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35(1): 428.Google Scholar
Steele, Claude and Aronson, Joshua. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(5): 797811.Google Scholar
Toff, Benjamin. 2016. “The Blind Scorekeepers: Journalism, Polling, and the Battle to Define Public Opinion in American Politics.” Ph.D. diss. Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Van Driel, Jan H., Beijaard, Douwe, and Verloop, Nico. 2001. “Professional Development and Reform in Science Education: The Role of Teachers’ Practical Knowledge.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(2): 137–58.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Robert O., Katz, Elihu, and Kim, Joohan. 2000. “Bridging the Spheres: Political and Personal Conversation in Public and Private Spaces.” Journal of Communication 50(1): 7192.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 2012. “What Nature and Origins Leaves Out.” Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24(4): 569642.Google Scholar