Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T00:05:17.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Discussion of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s How Democracies Die

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2018

Abstract

Among the many scholarly attempts to reckon with the causes and consequences of Donald Trump’s rise, few have attracted popular attention on the scale of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s How Democracies Die. Seldom do books by political scientists make it onto the New York Times best sellers list, but this one has, a testament to its broad influence. Levitsky and Ziblatt situate Trumpism within a broader comparative and historical context in order to assess its similarities to and differences from democratic breakdowns elsewhere, particularly in Europe and Latin America. Their broad argument is that modern slides into authoritarianism are not the result of revolutions or military coups, but rather the consequence of a steady erosion of political norms and the assault on such fundamental democratic institutions as an independent judiciary and a free press. In short, contemporary democracies die not as a result of men with guns attacking from outside the system, but rather because elected leaders from inside that system slowly undermine them. Judged from this standpoint, the authors argue that American democracy is now in real danger, and they offer a range of suggestions for saving it. How convincing is Levitsky and Ziblatt’s analysis of democratic breakdown, and how well does it apply to the American case? How useful are the solutions that they offer for rescuing American democracy? We have asked a range of prominent scholars from across the discipline to consider these questions in the present symposium.

Type
Review Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H. and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvares, Claudia and Dahlgren, Peter. 2016. “Populism, Extremism and Media: Mapping an Uncertain Terrain.” European Journal of Communication 31(1): 4657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Katherine J. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer Walsh, Katherine. 2004. Talking about Politics: Informal Conversations and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounk, Yasha. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2018. “Populism and the Economics of Globalization.” Journal of International Business Policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waisbord, Silvio and Amado, Adriana. 2017. “Populist Communication by Digital Means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America.” Information, Communication and Society 20(9): 1330–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar