Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:07:43.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of the species of Dinobothrium (Cestoda), with a description of a new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. A. Baylis
H. A. Baylis
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A critical review is presented of the species of Dinobothrium and their probable synonyms. D. septaria v. Beneden and D. planum Linton are accepted as valid species. D. keilini Sproston and D. plicitum Linton are regarded as of doubtful status, the former being probably a synonym of D. septaria, while D. plicitum may be a synonym of D. planum. The type-specimens of D. keilini and of D. paciferum Sproston have been re-examined. A new interpretation is offered of the structure of the scolex of D. paciferum, and some other details of its anatomy are redescribed. A small species from Cetorhinus maximus is described, which is very similar to, and may prove to be identical with, Dinobothrium paciferum. As it apparently differs in having the neck and parts of the bothria covered with spines, it is treated as a distinct species and named D. spinosum. The question of the specific identity of the known larval forms of Dinobothrium is briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 40 , Issue 1-2 , January 1950 , pp. 96 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beneden, P. J. van (1889). Bull. Acad. Roy. Belg. (3), 17, 68.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P. (1936). In Joyeux & Baer (q.v.), p. 509.Google Scholar
Guevara Pozo, D. (1945). Rev. Ibérica de Parasit., Granada, Tomo extraordinario, 260.Google Scholar
Joyeux, C. (1923). Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 1, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyeux, C. & Baer, J. G. (1936). Cestodes. Faune de France, 30, 613 pp.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1897). Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 19, 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, E. (1922). Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 60, Art. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lönnberg, E. (1892). K. Svensk. Vetensk. Akad. Handl. 24, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Lönnberg, E. (1899). Bergens Mus. Aarb. no. 4 (1898), 23 pp.Google Scholar
López-Neyra, C. R. (1945). Rev. Ibérica de Parasit. 5, 213.Google Scholar
Masi, L. (1913). Boll. Soc. zool. ital. (3), 1, 323.Google Scholar
Mola, P. (1906). Ann. Mus. zool. Univ. Napoli, (2), no. 6, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Nybelin, O. (1914). Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, 3, 225.Google Scholar
Perrenoud, W. (1931). Rev. Suisse Zool. 38, 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, T. (1909). 26th Ann. Rep. Fish. Bd. Scotland, (1907), p. 73.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. (1925). Mem. Lpool Sch. Trop. Med. N.S. no. 2, pp. xv + 368.Google Scholar
Sproston, N. G. (1948). Parasitology, 39 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. (1927). J. Parasit. 13, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar