Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:16:54.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Host-parasite relationships between larval Sialis lutaria (Megaloptera) and Neoechinorhynchus rutili (Acanthocephala)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Olivia L. Lassiere
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland

Summary

The role of the larva of the alder fly Sialis lutaria as a host for Neoechinorhynchus rutili (Acanthocephala) has been investigated. Brown trout (Salmo trutta) infected with N. rutili were found to be feeding on S. lutaria larvae which contained juvenile acanthocephalans in their haemocoels. These acanthocephalans have been identified as N. rutili. A previous report of this host-parasite relationship indicated some form of host response to the larval acanthocephalan. Stained wax sections of S. lutaria larvae infected with N. rutili did not show any evidence of either a host response or encapsulation. Samples of S. lutaria larvae revealed an interesting pattern of infection. Only larvae of a particular size range were infected. An experiment to infect commercially obtained rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) with N. rutili by feeding them with infected S. lutaria larvae was successful. Since S. lutaria larvae are known to be prey items for trout it appears that this route of infection could commonly occur in the natural environment. Larval S. lutaria is considered as an additional intermediate host to several ostracod species which have been shown to play a role in the transmission of N. rutili.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brady, G. S. (1910). A revision of the British species of ostracod Crustacea belonging to the subfamilies Candoninae and Herpetocyprinae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 194220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. F., Chubb, J. C. & Veltkamp, C. J. (1986). A key to the species of Acanthocephala parasitic in British freshwater fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 28, 327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, W. L. (1969). Morphological features as tools and as pitfalls in acanthocephalan systematics. In Problems in Systematics of Parasites (ed. Schmidt, G. D.), pp. 924. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, I. E., Gussev, A. V., Dubinina, M. N., Izyumova, N. A., Smirnova, T. S., Sokolovskaya, I. L., Shtein, G. A., Shulman, S. S. & Epshtein, V. M. (1962). Key to the Parasites of Freshwater Fishes of the U.S.S.R., pp. 1776. Moscow and Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. [In Russian: translation Israel Program for Scientific Translations Cat. No. 1136.]Google Scholar
Fitter, R. & Manuel, R. (1986). Field Guide to the Freshwater Life of Britain and North-West Europe. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Frost, W. E. & Smyly, W. J. P. (1952). The brown trout of a moorland fish pond. Journal of Animal Ecology 21, 6286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golvan, Y. J. (1959). Le Phylum des Acanthocephala. Deuxième note. La classe de Eoacanthocephala (Van Cleave, 1936). Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 34, 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1974). A checklist of British and Irish freshwater fish parasites with notes on their distribution. Journal of Fish Biology 6, 613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1985). Regulation and dynamics of acanthocephalan populations. In Biology of the Acanthocephala (ed. Crompton, D. W. T. and Nickol, B. B.), pp. 385416. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kimmins, D. E. (1962). Keys to the British species of aquatic Megaloptera and Neuroptera. Fresh Water Biological Association Scientific Publication No. 8, 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Merritt, S. V. & Pratt, I. (1964). The life history of Neoechinorhynchus rutili and its development in the intermediate host (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae). Journal of Parasitology 50, 394400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, A. (1933). Acanthocephala. In Dr H. G. Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, vol. 4, pp. 333582. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft MBH.Google Scholar
Nickol, B. B. (1985). Epizootiology. In Biology of the Acanthocephala (ed. Crompton, D. W. T. and Nickol, B. B.), pp. 307–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pyefinch, K. A. (1960). Trout in Scotland. A Story of Brown Trout Research at Pitlochry. Edinburgh: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. (1953). The parasites of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) and other freshwater fish. Unpublished report of the Brown Trout Research Laboratory, Scottish Home Department, pp. 1130. (BTSC. 81 34. FW 53).Google Scholar
Skryabina, E. S. (1978). Morphological variability of thorny-headed worms of the genus Neoechinorhynchus. (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae) from fishes of waterbodies of the glacial provine in U.S.S.R. Parazitologiya (Leningrad) 12, 512–22.Google Scholar
Valtonen, E. T. (1979). Neoechinorhynchus rutili (Müller, 1780) (Acanthocephala) in the whitefish Coregonus nasus (Pallas sensu Svärdson) from the Bay of Bothnia. Journal of Fish Diseases 2, 99103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleave, H. J. & Lynch, J. E. (1950). The circumpolar distribution of Neoechinorhynchus rutili, an acanthocephalan parasite of fresh-water fishes. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 69, 156–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villot, A. (1885). Sur l'état larvaire et l'hôte intermédiaire de l'Echinorhynchus clavaeceps Zeder. Zoologischer Anzeiger 8, 1922.Google Scholar
Walkey, M. (1967). The ecology of Neoechinorhynchus rutili (Müller). Journal of Parasitology 53, 795804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamaguti, S. (1963). Acanthocephala. In Systema Helminthum, vol. 5, pp. 1423. New York and London: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar