Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:52:44.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects on cattle of artificial infestations with the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. J. De Castro ,
M. P. Cunningham ,
T. T. Dolan ,
R. D. Dransfield ,
R. M. Newson  and
A. S. Young
J. J. De Castro
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
M. P. Cunningham
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
T. T. Dolan
Affiliation:
Protozoology Division, Veterinary Research Department, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Muguga, Box 32, Kikuyu, Kenya
R. D. Dransfield
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
R. M. Newson
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
A. S. Young
Affiliation:
Protozoology Division, Veterinary Research Department, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Muguga, Box 32, Kikuyu, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Groups of ten cattle were exposed to 0, 40 and 400 adult Rhipicephalus appendiculatus feeding once a week for 24 weeks. Although no differences in cumulative percentage weight gain were found at the end of the experiment, animals free of ticks performed better during the first 12 weeks. A marked recovery of the 400-tick group was recorded during weeks 13–24 and after ticks were removed. Haemoglobin and packed cell volume values were lowered in tick-infested animals but no clear trends were observed in red and white blood cells. No differences between the percentages of ticks feeding in the 2 tick-infested groups on day 2 were observed but higher numbers of females were feeding on the 40-tick group on day 5. More ticks were found on day 5 after tick application to the cattle during weeks 1–6 than in the rest of the experiment. Significant correlations were found between lymph node enlargement and ear damage when they were tested against tick load. R. appendiculatus nymphs feeding on the formerly tick-infested cattle were fewer, lighter and engorged in a shorter time than those on the control animals. The possible causes for the reduction in ticks feeding, the changes in cattle weights, blood composition and development of host resistance are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 21 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, K. P. (1960). Notes on the rearing of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and their infection with Theileria parva for experimental transmission. Bulletin of Epizootic Diseases of Africa 8, 33–43.Google Scholar
Bennett, G. F. (1969). Boophilus microplus (Acarina:Ixodidae): Experimental infestations on cattle restrained from grooming. Experimental Parasitology 26, 323–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branagan, D. (1974). The feeding performance of the ixodid Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neurn. on rabbits, cattle and other hosts. Bulletin of Entomological Research 64, 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burridge, M. J. & Kimber, C. D. (1972). The indirect fluorescent antibody test for experimental East Coast fever (Theileria parva infection) in cattle. Evaluation of cell-culture schizont antigen. Research in Veterinary Science 13, 451–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrier, D. E., Vizcaino, O., Terry, M., Betancourt, A., Kuttler, K. L., Carson, C. A., Trevino, G. & Ristic, M. (1979). Mortality, weight loss and anaemia in Bos taurus calves exposed to Boophilus microplus ticks in the tropics of Colombia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 11, 215–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, M. P. (1981). Biological control of ticks with particular references to Rhipecephalus appendiculatus. In Advances in the Control of Theileriosis (ed. Irvin, A. D., Cunningham, M. P. and Young, A. S.), pp. 160–4. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, T. T. & Young, A. S. (1981). An approach to the economic assessment of East Coast fever in Kenya. In Advances in the Control of Theileriosis (ed. Irvin, A. D., Cunningham, M. P. and Young, A. S.), pp. 412–5. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, J. (1960). The effect of ticks on the growth rate of cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 3, 130–2.Google Scholar
Gee, R. W., Bainbridge, M. H. & Haslam, J. Y. (1971). The effect of Cattle Tick (Boophilus microplus) on beef production in the Northern Territory. Australian Veterinary Journal 47, 257–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller-Hauft, A., Varma, M. R. G. & Langi, A. O. (1981). Acquired resistance to ixodid ticks in laboratory animals. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 75, 147–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewetson, R. W. & Lewis, I. J. (1976). A comparison of the effect of two regimes of infestation on the development of resistance by cattle to the Cattle Tick, Boophilus microplus (Can.). Journal of Parasitology 62, 307–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, L. A. Y. & Haydock, K. P. (1969). The effect of Cattle Tick (Boophilus microplus) on production of Brahman-cross and British-breed cattle in northern Australia. Australian Veterinary Journal 45, 175–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, D. A. (1963). The effect of Cattle Tick infestation on the growth rate of cattle. Audtralian Veterinary Journal 39, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutu, W. Z. (1982). Pyrexia in response to Rhipicephalus appendiculatus infestation in calves. Tropical Animal Health and Production 14, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, M. J. & Barker, R. W. (1980). A selected bibliography of tick-host resistance and immunological relationships. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 26, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Kelly, J. C., Seebeck, R. M. & Springell, P. H. (1971). Alterations in host metabolism by specific and anorectic effects of the Cattle Tick (Boophilus microplus). II. Changes in blood composition. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 24, 381–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Kelly, J. C. & Seifert, G. W. (1970). The effects of tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation on the blood composition of Shorthorn × Hereford cattle in high and low planes of nutrition. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 23, 681–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechav, Y., Kuhn, H. G. & Knight, M. M. (1980). The effects of the tick Amblyomma hebraeum (Acari Ixodidae) on blood composition and weight of rabbits. Journal of Medical Entomology 17, 555–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rich, G. B. (1973). Grooming and yarding of spring born calves prevented paralysis caused by the Rocky Mountain Wood Tick. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 53, 377–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, R. F. (1957). Studies on the reactions of animals to infestation with ticks. I. Tick anaemia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 209–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M., Springell, P. H. & O'Kelly, J. C. (1971). Alterations in host metabolism by the specific and anorectic effects of the Cattle Tick (Boophilus microplus). I. Food intake and body weight growth. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 24, 373–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snowball, G. J. (1956). The effect of self-licking by cattle on infestations of Cattle Tick Boophilus microplus Canestrini. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R. J. & Plumb, I. R. (1981). The effect of natural tick infestation on various blood components and livemass in the bovine in South Africa. In Proceedings of a Conference on Tick Biology and Control. Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa, pp. 21–8.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. & Short, A. J. (1972). Effects of field infestations of gastrointestinal helminths and of the Cattle Tick (Boophilus microplus) on growth of three breeds of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 177–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rensburg, S. J. (1959). Haematological investigations into the rhipicephaline tick toxicosis syndrome. Journal of the South African Veterinary Medical Association 30, 75–95.Google Scholar
Willadsen, P. (1980). Immunity to ticks. Advances in Parasitology 18, 293–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. E., Hair, J. A. & Buckner, R. G. (1977). Effects of the Gulf Coast Ticks on blood composition and weights of drylot Hereford steers. Journal of Economic Entomology 70, 229–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. E., Hair, J. A. & McNew, R. W. (1978). Effects of Gulf Coast Ticks on blood composition and weights of pastured Hereford steers. Journal of Parasitology 64, 336–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Young, A. S., De Castro, J. J., Burns, O. A. C. & Murphy, D. (1985). Potential of ear-tags impregnated with synthetic pyrethroids for control of the Brown Ear Tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus), infesting cattle. Parasitology 90 (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar