Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Differences between populations in host manipulation by the tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus – is there local adaptation?

  • Nina Hafer (a1)

Abstract

Host manipulation whereby a parasite increases its transmission to a subsequent host by altering the behaviour of its current host is very far spread. It also occurs in host–parasite systems that are widely distributed. This offers the potential for local adaptation. The tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus modifies its first intermediate copepod host's predation susceptibility to suit its own needs by reducing its activity before it becomes infective and increasing it thereafter. To investigate potential differences in host manipulation between different populations and test for potential local adaptation with regard to host manipulation, I experimentally infected hosts from two distinct populations with parasites from either population in a fully crossed design. Host manipulation differed between populations mostly once the parasite had reached infectivity. These differences in infective parasites were mostly due to differences between different parasite populations. In not yet infective parasites, however, host population also had a significant effect on host manipulation. There was no evidence of local adaptation; parasites were able to manipulate foreign and local hosts equally well. Likewise, hosts were equally poor at resisting host manipulation by local and foreign parasites.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Differences between populations in host manipulation by the tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus – is there local adaptation?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Differences between populations in host manipulation by the tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus – is there local adaptation?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Differences between populations in host manipulation by the tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus – is there local adaptation?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Nina Hafer, E-mail: hafer@evolbio.mpg.de

References

Hide All
Bates, DM, Maechler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 148.
Benesh, DP (2010 a) What are the evolutionary constraints on larval growth in a trophically transmitted parasite? Oecologia 162, 599608.
Benesh, DP (2010 b) Developmental inflexibility of larval tapeworms in response to resource variation. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 487497.
Benesh, DP and Hafer, N (2012) Growth and ontogeny of the tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus in its copepod first host affects performance in its stickleback second intermediate host. Parasites & Vectors 5, 90.
Benesh, DP, Weinreich, F and Kalbe, M (2012) The relationship between larval size and fitness in the tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus: bigger is better? Oikos 121, 13911399.
Blanquart, F, Kaltz, O, Nuismer, SL and Gandon, S (2013) A practical guide to measuring local adaptation. Ecology Letters 16, 11951205.
Champely, S (2017) pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis. version 1.2–1. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=pwr
Clarke, AS (1954) Studies on the life cycle of the pseudophyllidean cestode Schistocephalus solidus. Proceedings of the Zoological Society 124, 257302.
Cohen, H (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Dianne, L, Perrot-Minnot, MJ, Bauer, A, Gaillard, M, Léger, E and Rigaud, T (2011) Protection first then facilitation: a manipulative parasite modulates the vulnerability to predation of its intermediate host according to its own developmental stage. Evolution 65, 26922698.
Dubinina, MN (1980) Tapeworms (Cestoda, Ligulidae) of the Fauna of the USSR. Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Dehli.
Franceschi, N, Cornet, S, Bollache, LL, Dechaume-Moncharmont, F-X, Bauer, A, Motreuil, S and Rigaud, T (2010) Variation between populations and local adaptation in acanthocephalan-induced parasite manipulation. Evolution 64, 24172430.
Gandon, S and Nuismer, SL (2009) Interactions between genetic drift, gene flow, and selection mosaics drive parasite local adaptation. American Naturalist 173, 212224.
Gopko, M, Mikheev, VN and Taskinen, J (2015) Changes in host behaviour caused by immature larvae of the eye fluke: evidence supporting the predation suppression hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69, 17231730.
Greischar, MA and Koskella, B (2007) A synthesis of experimental work on parasite local adaptation. Ecology Letters 10, 418434.
Hafer, N and Benesh, DP (2015) Does resource availability affect host manipulation? – An experimental test with Schistocephalus solidus. Parasitology Open 1, e3.
Hafer, N and Milinski, M (2015) When parasites disagree: evidence for parasite-induced sabotage of host manipulation. Evolution 69, 611620.
Hafer, N and Milinski, M (2016) Inter- and intraspecific conflicts between parasites over host manipulation. Proceeding of the Royal Society B 283, 20152870.
Hamley, M, Franke, F, Kurtz, J and Scharsack, JP (2017) An experimental approach to the immuno-modulatory basis of host-parasite local adaptation in tapeworm-infected sticklebacks. Experimental Parasitology 180, 119132.
Hammerschmidt, K, Koch, K, Milinski, M, Chubb, JC and Parker, GA (2009) When to go: optimization of host switching in parasites with complex life cycles. Evolution 63, 19761986.
Hanzelová, V and Gerdeaux, D (2003) Seasonal occurrence of the tapeworm Proteocephalus longicollis and its transmission from copepod intermediate host to fish. Parasitology Research 91, 130136.
Hoeksema, JD and Forde, SE (2008) A meta-analysis of factors affecting local adaptation. American Naturalist 171, 275290.
Holmes, JC and Bethel, WM (1972) Modification of intermediate host behaviour by parasites. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 51, 123149.
Hothorn, T, Bretz, F and Westfall, P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50, 346363.
Kalbe, M, Eizaguirre, C, Scharsack, JP and Jakobsen, PJ (2016) Reciprocal cross infection of sticklebacks with the diphyllobothriidean cestode Schistocephalus solidus reveals consistent population differences in parasite growth and host resistance. Parasites & Vectors 9, 130.
Kaltz, O and Shykoff, JA (1998) Local adaptation in host–parasite systems. Heredity 81, 361370.
Kawecki, TJ and Ebert, D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecology Letters 7, 12251241.
Lajeunesse, MJ and Forbes, MR (2002) Host range and local parasite adaptation. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society 269, 703710.
Mauck, KE, De Moraes, CM and Mescher, MC (2014) Evidence of local adaptation in plant virus effects on host-vector interactions. Integrative and Comparative Biology 54, 193209.
Moore, J (2002) Parasites and the Behavior of Animals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moore, J (2013) An overview of parasite-induced behavioral alterations – and some lessons from bats. The Journal of Experimental Biology 216, 1117.
Mouritsen, KN and Poulin, R (2003) Parasite-induced trophic facilitation exploited by a non-host predator: a manipulator's nightmare. International Journal for Parasitology 33, 10431050.
Nishimura, N, Heins, DC, Andersen, RO, Barber, I and Cresko, WA (2011) Distinct lineages of schistocephalus parasites in threespine and ninespine stickleback hosts revealed by DNA sequence analysis. PLoS ONE 6, e22505.
Parker, GA, Ball, MA, Chubb, JC, Hammerschmidt, K and Milinski, M (2009) When should a trophically transmitted parasite manipulate its host? Evolution 63, 448458.
Pasternak, AF, Huntingford, FA and Crompton, DWT (1995) Changes in metabolism and behaviour of the freshwater copepod Cyclops strenuus abyssorum infected with Diphyllobothrium spp. Parasitology 110, 395399.
Poulin, R (1994) Meta-analysis of parasite-induced behavioural changes. Animal Behaviour 48, 137146.
Poulin, R (2010) Parasite manipulation of host behavior: an update and frequently asked questions. Advances in the Study of Behavior 41, 151186.
Poulin, R and Thomas, F (1999) Phenotypic variability induced by parasites: extent and evolutionary implications. Parasitology Today 15, 2832.
Poulin, R, Curtis, MA and Rau, ME (1992) Effects of Eubothrium salvelini (Cestoda) on the behaviour of Cyclops vernalis (Copepoda) and its susceptibility to fish predators. Parasitology 105, 265271.
R Development Core Team and R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Scharsack, JP, Franke, F, Erin, NI, Kuske, A, Büscher, J, Stolz, H, Samonte, IE, Kurtz, J and Kalbe, M (2016) Effects of environmental variation on host-parasite interaction in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Zoology 119, 375383.
Schneider, CA, Rasband, WS and Eliceiri, KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 671675.
Seppälä, O, Valtonen, ET and Benesh, DP (2008) Host manipulation by parasites in the world of dead-end predators: adaptation to enhance transmission? Proceeding of the Royal Society B 275, 16111615.
Smyth, JD (1946) Studies on tapeworm physiology I. The cultivation of Schistocephalus solidus in vitro. The Journal of Experimental Biology 23, 4770.
Sprehn, CG, Blum, MJ, Quinn, TP and Heins, DC (2015) Landscape genetics of Schistocephalus solidus parasites in threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from Alaska. PLoS ONE 10, 117.
Tain, L, Perrot-Minnot, M-J, Cezilly, F and Cézilly, F (2007) Differential influence of Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala) on brain serotonergic activity in two congeneric host species. Biology Letters 3, 6871.
Urdal, K, Tierney, JF and Jakobsen, PJ (1995) The tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus alters the activity and response, but not the predation susceptibility of infected copepods. The Journal of Parasitology 81, 330333.
van der Veen, IT and Kurtz, J (2002) To avoid or eliminate: cestode infections in copepods. Parasitology 124, 465474.
Weber, JN, Kalbe, M, Shim, KC, Erin, NI, Steinel, NC, Ma, L and Bolnick, DI (2017) Resist globally, infect locally: a transcontinental test of adaptation by stickleback and their tapeworm parasite. The American Naturalist 189, 4357.
Wedekind, C (1997) The infectivity, growth, and virulence of the cestode Schistocephalus solidus in its first intermediate host, the copepod Macrocyclops albidus. Parasitology 115, 317324.
Wedekind, C and Milinski, M (1996) Do three-spined sticklebacks avoid consuming copepods, the first intermediate host of Schistocephalus solidus?—An experimental analysis of behavioural resistance. Parasitology 112, 371383.
Wedekind, C, Strahm, D and Schärer, L (1998) Evidence for strategic egg production in a hermaphroditic cestode. Parasitology 117, 373382.
Weinreich, F, Benesh, DP and Milinski, M (2013) Suppression of predation on the intermediate host by two trophically-transmitted parasites when uninfective. Parasitology 140, 129135.
Zander, CD, Groenewold, S and Strohbach, U (1994) Parasite transfer from crustacean to fish hosts in the Lübeck Bight, SW Baltic Sea. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 48, 89105.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Hafer supplementary material 1
Supplementary Table

 Word (16 KB)
16 KB

Differences between populations in host manipulation by the tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus – is there local adaptation?

  • Nina Hafer (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.