Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Article contents

Unveiling patterns of genetic variation in parasite–host associations: an example with pinworms and Neotropical primates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2018


Brenda Solórzano García
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico
Amanda D. Melin
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Department of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Filippo Aureli
Affiliation:
Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, C.P. 91190, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
Gerardo Pérez Ponce de León
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
Corresponding

Abstract

Patterns of genetic variation among populations can reveal the evolutionary history of species. Pinworm parasites are highly host specific and form strong co-evolutionary associations with their primate hosts. Here, we describe the genetic variation observed in four Trypanoxyuris species infecting different howler and spider monkey subspecies in Central America to determine if historical dispersal processes and speciation in the host could explain the genetic patterns observed in the parasites. Mitochondrial (cox1) and ribosomal (28S) DNA were analysed to assess genetic divergence and phylogenetic history of these parasites. Sequences of the 28S gene were identical within pinworms species regardless of host subspecies. However, phylogenetic analyses, haplotype relationships and genetic divergence with cox1 showed differentiation between pinworm populations according to host subspecies in three of the four Trypanoxyuris species analysed. Haplotype separation between host subspecies was not observed in Trypanoxyuris minutus, nor in Trypanoxyuris atelis from Ateles geoffoyi vellerosus and Ateles geoffoyi yucatanensis. Levels of genetic diversity and divergence in these parasites relate with such estimates reported for their hosts. This study shows how genetic patterns uncovered in parasitic organisms can reflect the host phylogenetic and biogeographic histories.


Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Bandelt, HJ, Forster, P and Röhl, A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 3748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, LG, Thrall, PH, Burdon, JJ and Linde, CC (2008) Life history determines genetic structure and evolutionary potential of host-parasite interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23, 678685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blasco-Costa, I and Poulin, R (2013) Host traits explain the genetic structure of parasites: a meta-analysis. Parasitology 140, 13161322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blouin, M (1998) Mitochondrial DNA diversity in nematodes. Journal of Helminthology 72, 285289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradburd, GS, Ralph, PL and Coop, GM (2013) Disentangling the effects of geographic and ecological isolation on genetic differentiation. Evolution 67, 32583273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmichael, LE, Krizan, J, Nagy, JA, Fuglei, E, Dumond, M, Johnson, D, Veitch, A, Berteaux, D and Strobeck, C (2007) Historical and ecological determinants of genetic structure in Arctic canids. Molecular Ecology 16, 34663483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, AC and Dubach, JM (2000) Phylogenetic relationships of spider monkeys (Ateles) based on mitochondrial DNA variation. International Journal of Primatology 21, 381420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conga, DF, Giese, EG, Serra-Freire, NM, Bowler, M and Mayor, P (2016) Morphology of the oxyurid nematodes Trypanoxyuris (t.) cacajao n. sp. and T. (T.) ucayalii n. sp. from the red uakari monkey Cacajao calvus ucayalii in the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Helminthology 90, 483493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortés-Ortiz, L, Bermingham, E, Rico, C, Rodriguez-Luna, E, Sampaio, I and Ruiz-Garcia, M (2003) Molecular systematics and biogeography of the Neotropical monkey genus, Alouatta. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26, 6481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Criscione, CD (2008) Parasite co-structure: broad and local scale approaches. Parasite 15, 439443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellsworth, JA and Hoelzer, GA (2006) Genetic evidence on the historical biogeography of Central American howler monkeys. In Lehman, SM and Fleagle, LG (eds), Primate Biogeography, Progress and Prospects. New York: Springer, pp. 81103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, S (2006) The biogeographic history of Mesoamerican primates. In Estrada, A, Garber, P, Pavelka, M and Luecke, L (eds), New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates: Distribution, Ecology, Behavior, and Conservation. New York: Springer, pp. 81114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, H (2009) Methods of collection and identification of minute nematodes from the feces of primates, with special application to coevolutionary study of pinworms. In Huffman, MA and Chapman, CA (eds), Primate Parasite Ecology. The Dynamics and Study of Host-Parasite Relationships. UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1946.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, H, Ikeda, Y, Dias-Aquino, JJ and Fukui, D (2004) Redescription of two pinworms from the black-handed spider monkey, Ateles geoffroyi, with reestablishment of Oxyuronema and Buckleyenterobius (nematoda: Oxyuroidea). Comparative Parasitology 71, 166174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, H, Sato, H and Torii, H (2012) Redescription of Enterobius (enterobius) macaci yen, 1973 (Nematoda: Oxyuridae: Enterobiinae) based on material collected from wild Japanese macaque, Macaca fuscata (Primates: Cecopithecidae). Journal of Parasitology 98, 152159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hey, J and Machado, CA (2003) The study of structured populations-new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nature Reviews. Genetics 4, 535543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugot, JP (1999) Primates and their pinworm parasites: the Cameron Hypothesis revisited. Systematic Biology 48, 523546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hugot, JP, Gardner, SL and Morand, S (1996) The Enterobiinae subfam. nov. (Nematoda, Oxyurida) pinworm parasites of primates and rodents. International Journal for Parasitology 26, 147159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huyse, T, Poulin, R and Théron, A (2005) Speciation in parasites: a population genetics approach. Trends in Parasitology 21, 469475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jasso-del Toro, C, Márquez-Valdelamar, L and Mondragón-Ceballos, R (2016) Diversidad genética en grupos de monos aulladores de manto (Alouatta palliata mexicana) en la Reserva de la Biosfera Los Tuxtlas (Veracruz, México). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87, 10691079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latch, EK, Reding, DM, Heffelfinger, JR, Alcalá-Galván, CH and Rhodes, OE (2014) Range-wide analysis of genetic structure in a widespread, highly mobile species (Odocoileus hemionus) reveals the importance of historical biogeography. Molecular Ecology 23, 31713190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M, Pfeiffer, W and Schwartz, T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop, New Orleans, pp. 18.Google Scholar
Morales-Jimenez, AL, Cortés-Ortiz, L and Di Fiore, A (2015) Phylogenetic relationships of Mesoamerican spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi): Molecular evidence suggests the need for a revised taxonomy. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 82, 484494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadler, S (1995) Microevolution and the genetic structure of parasite populations. Journal of Parasitology 81, 395403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadler, SA and Pérez-Ponce de León, G (2011) Integrating molecular and morphological approaches for characterizing parasite cryptic species: implications for parasitology. Parasitology 138, 16881709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakano, T, Okamoto, M, Ikeda, Y and Hasegawa, H (2006) Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene and nuclear rDNA regions of Enterobius vermicularis parasitic in captive chimpanzees with special reference to its relationship with pinworms in humans. Parasitology Research 100, 5157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ngeve, MN, Van der Stocken, T, Menemenlis, D, Koedam, N and Triest, L (2017) Hidden founders? Strong bottlenecks and fine-scale genetic structure in mangrove populations of the Cameroon Estuary complex. Hydrobiologia 803, 189207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nylander, JAA (2004) MrModeltest v2. Uppsala University: Evolutionary Biology Centre. Program distributed by the author.Google Scholar
Polzin, T and Dabeschmand, SV (2003) On Steiner trees and minimum spanning trees in hypergraphs. Operations Research Letters 31, 1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronquist, F and Huelsenbeck, JP (2003) Mrbayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19, 15721574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozas, J, Sánchez-DelBarrio, JC, Messeguer, X and Rozas, R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19, 24962497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz-García, M, Lichilín, N, Escobar-Armel, P, Rodríguez, G and Gutiérrez-Espeleta, G (2016) Historical genetic demography and some insights into the systematics of Ateles (Atelidae, Primates) by means of diverse mitochondrial genes. In Ruiz-García, M and Shostell, JM (eds), Phylogeny, Molecular Population Genetics, Evolutionary Biology and Conservation of the Neotropical Primates. New York, NY: Nova Sience Publisher Inc., pp. 143.Google Scholar
Ruiz-García, M, Cerón, Á, Sánchez-Castillo, S, Rueda-Zozaya, P, Pinedo-Castro, M, Gutierrez-Espeleta, G and Shostell, JM (2017) Phylogeography of the mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata; Atelidae, Primates) across its geographical range by means of mitochondrial genetic analyses and new insights about the phylogeny of Alouatta. Folia Primatologica 88, 421454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rylands, AB, Groves, CP, Mittermeier, RA, Cortes-Ortiz, L and Hines, J (2006) Taxonomy and distributions of Mesoamerican primates. In Estrada, A, Garber, PA, Pavelka, M and Luecke, L (eds), New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates: Distribution, Ecology, Behavior and Conservation. New York: Springer, pp. 2979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solórzano-García, B and Pérez-Ponce de León, G (2018) Parasites of Neotropical primates: a review. International Journal of Primatology 39, 155182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solórzano-García, B, Nadler, SA and Pérez Ponce de León, G (2015) Trypanoxyuris atelis and T. atelophora (Nematoda: Oxyuridae) in wild spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) in tropical rain forest in Mexico: Morphological and molecular evidence. Parasitology International 64, 229235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solórzano-García, B, Nadler, SA and Pérez-Ponce de León, G (2016) Pinworm diversity in free-ranging howler monkeys (Alouatta spp.) in Mexico: Morphological and molecular evidence for two new Trypanoxyuris species (Nematoda: Oxyuridae). Parasitology International 65, 401411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solórzano-García, B, Gasca-Pineda, J, Poulin, R and Pérez-Ponce de León, G (2017) Lack of genetic structure in pinworm populations from New World primates in forest fragments. International Journal for Parasitology 47, 941950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamatakis, A (2014) RAxML Version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30, 13121313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K, Stecher, G, Peterson, D, Filipski, A and Kumar, S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biological Evolution 30, 27252729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiteman, NK and Parker, PG (2005) Using parasites to infer host population history: a new rational for parasite conservation. Animal Conservation 8, 175181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solórzano García et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

[Opens in a new window]
File 118 KB

Altmetric attention score


Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 144 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 16th October 2018 - 5th December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Linked content

Please note a has been issued for this article.


Hostname: page-component-b4dcdd7-qjxlp Total loading time: 1.36 Render date: 2020-12-05T02:12:07.807Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Sat Dec 05 2020 02:00:32 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Unveiling patterns of genetic variation in parasite–host associations: an example with pinworms and Neotropical primates
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Unveiling patterns of genetic variation in parasite–host associations: an example with pinworms and Neotropical primates
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Unveiling patterns of genetic variation in parasite–host associations: an example with pinworms and Neotropical primates
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *