Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-sbc4w Total loading time: 0.835 Render date: 2021-02-26T19:52:48.297Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Article contents

Comparative assessment of conventional PCR with multiplex real-time PCR using SYBR Green I detection for the molecular diagnosis of imported malaria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2004

R. FABRE
Affiliation:
Service de Parasitologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, 31059 Toulouse 09, France
A. BERRY
Affiliation:
Service de Parasitologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, 31059 Toulouse 09, France
B. MORASSIN
Affiliation:
Service de Parasitologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, 31059 Toulouse 09, France
J. F. MAGNAVAL
Affiliation:
Service de Parasitologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, 31059 Toulouse 09, France

Abstract

For the diagnosis of imported malaria, optical or immunochromatographic methods are known to be less sensitive and less specific than PCR-based methods, which are conversely more complicated and time-consuming. An original strategy, based upon the sequential use of a multiplex competitive real-time PCR detecting Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium spp. infection, followed by, if necessary, a single real-time PCR for species identification, was therefore performed and then tested versus conventional PCR in routine conditions. Conventional PCR has been used since October 1999 in the Department of Parasitology, University Hospitals in Toulouse, as a 2nd line diagnostic method. Out of 183 patients tested, 48 were found to be harbouring a falciparum infection by conventional microscopy, 60 by conventional PCR and 60 by multiplex competitive real-time PCR. Nine further patients had a non-falciparum infection, and concordant species identifications were obtained by both conventional PCR and single real-time PCR. The major value of PCR-based methods, when compared to microscopical techniques, was to ascertain the negativity of a suspect sample. Moreover, real-time PCR allows simplification of the operating procedure, with a diagnosis being made within 2 h.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

BARKER, R. H. Jr., BANCHONGAKSORN, T., COURVAL, J. M., SUWONKERD, W., RIMWUNGTRAGOON, K. & WIRTH, D. F. (1992). A simple method to detect Plasmodium falciparum directly from blood samples using the polymerase chain reaction. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 46, 416426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARKER, R. H. Jr., SUEBSAENG, L., ROONEY, W. & WIRTH, D. F. (1989). Detection of Plasmodium falciparum in human patients: a comparison of the DNA probe method to microscopic diagnosis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 41, 266272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BROWN, A. E., KAIN, K. C., PIPITHKUL, J. & WEBSTER, H. K. (1992). Demonstration by polymerase chain reaction of mixed Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax infection undetected by conventional microscopy. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 86, 609612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CICERON, L., JAUREGUIBERRY, G., GAY, F. & DANIS, M. (1999). Development of a Plasmodium PCR for monitoring efficacy of antimalarial treatment. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37, 3538.Google Scholar
CORLESS, C. E., GUIVER, M., BORROW, R., EDWARDS-JONES, V., FOX, F. A. & KACZMARSKI, E. B. (2001). Simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in suspected cases of meningitis and septicemia using real-time PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39, 15531558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CRAIG, M. H. & SHARP, B. L. (1997). Comparative evaluation of four techniques for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum infections. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 91, 279282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DANIS, M., LEGROS, F., THELLIER, M. & CAUMES, E. (2002). Données actuelles sur le paludisme en France Métropolitaine. Medecine Tropicale 62, 214218.Google Scholar
HÄNSCHEID, T. & GROBUSCH, M. P. (2002). How useful is PCR in diagnosis of malaria? Trends in Parasitology 18, 395398.Google Scholar
HERMSEN, C. C., TELGT, D. S., LINDERS, E. H., VAN DE LOCHT, L. A., ELING, W. M., MENSINK, E. J. & SAUERWEIN, R. W. (2001). Detection of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites in vivo by real-time quantitative PCR. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 118, 247251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUMAR, A., OHRT, C., HARRINGTON, M. A., PILLAI, D. & KAIN, K. C. (1997). Parasight F test compared with the polymerase chain reaction and microscopy for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in travelers. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 56, 4448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JAUREGUIBERRY, G., HATIN, I., D'AURIOL, L. & GALIBERT, G. (1990). PCR detection of Plasmodium falciparum by oligonucleotide probes. Molecular and Cellular Probes 4, 409414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLEMENT, E., CHAUVEHEID, M.-P., THELLIER, M., BRICAIRE, F., DANIS, M. & CAUMES, M. (2001). Subacute clinical forms of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in travelers receiving chloroquine-proguanil prophylaxis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 33, 12.Google Scholar
KRUDSOOD, S., WILAIRATANA, P., MASON, D. P., TREEPRASERTSUK, S., SINGHASIVANON, P. & LOOAREESUWAN, S. (1999). Hidden Plasmodium falciparum infections. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 30, 623624.Google Scholar
LEVINE, R., WARLDAW, S. & PATTON, C. (1989). Detection of haematoparasites using Quantitative Buffy Coat analysis. Parasitology Today 5, 132134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOWE, B. S., JEFFA, N. K., NEW, L., PEDERSEN, C., ENGBAEK, K. & MARSH, K. (1996). Acridine orange fluorescence techniques as alternatives to traditional Giemsa staining for the diagnosis of malaria in developing countries. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 90, 3436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MACKAY, I. M., ARDEN, K. E. & NITSCHE, A. (2002). Real-time PCR in virology. Nucleic Acids Research 30, 12921305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAKLER, M., PALMER, C. J. & AGER, A. L. (1998). A review of practical techniques for the diagnosis of malaria. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 92, 419433.Google Scholar
MORASSIN, B., FABRE, R., BERRY, A. & MAGNAVAL, J. F. (2002). One year's experience of PCR as a routine method for the diagnosis of imported malaria. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 66, 503508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RUBIO, J. M., BENITO, A., BERZOSA, P. J., ROCHE, J., PUENTE, S., SUBIRATS, M., LOPEZ-VALEZ, R., GARCIA, L. & ALVAR, J. (1999 a). Usefulness of semi-nested multiplex PCR in surveillance of imported malaria in Spain. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37, 32603264.Google Scholar
RUBIO, J. M., BENITO, A., ROCHE, J., BERZOSA, P. J., GARCIA, M. L., MICO, M., EDU, M. & ALVAR, J. (1999 b). Semi-nested, multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of human malaria parasites and evidence of Plasmodium vivax infection in Equatorial Guinea. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 60, 183187.Google Scholar
RUBIO, J. M., BUHIGAS, L., SUBIRATS, M., BAQUERO, M., PUENTE, S. & BENITO, A. (2001). Limited level of accuracy provided by available rapid diagnosis tests for malaria enhances the need for PCR-based reference laboratories. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39, 27362737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAIKI, R. K., SCHARF, S., FALOONA, F., MULLIS, K. B., HORN, G. T., ERLICH, H. A. & ARNHEIM, N. (1985). Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for the diagnosis of sickle-cell anemia. Biotechnology 24, 476480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHIFF, C. J., PREMJI, Z. & MINJAS, J. N. (1993). The rapid manual ParaSight-F test. A new diagnostic tool for Plasmodium falciparum infection. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 87, 646648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SLOAN, L. M., HOPKINS, M. K., MITCHELL, P. S., VETTER, E. A., ROSENBLATT, J. E., HARMSEN, W. S., COCKERILL, F. R. & PATEL, R. (2002). Multiplex LightCycler PCR assay for detection and differentiation of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis in nasopharyngeal specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40, 96100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SNOUNOU, G., VIRIYAKOSOL, S., JARRA, W., THAITHONG, S. & BROWN, K. N. (1993 a). Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the polymerase chain reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infections. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 58, 283292.Google Scholar
SNOUNOU, G., VIRIYAKOSOL, S., ZHU, X. P., JARRA, W., PINHEIRO, L., ROSARIO, V. E., THAITONG, S. & BROWN, K. N. (1993 b). High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 61, 315320.Google Scholar
TAN, T. M. C., NELSON, J. S., NG, H. C., TING, R. C. Y. & KARA, U. A. K. (1997). Direct PCR amplification and sequence analysis of extrachromosomal Plasmodium DNA from dried blood spots. Acta Tropica 68, 105114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THAM, J. M., LEE, S. H., TAN, T. M., TING, R. C. & KARA, U. A. (1999). Detection and species determination of malaria parasites by PCR: comparison with microscopy and with ParaSight-F and ICT Malaria Pf tests in a clinical environment. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37, 12691273.Google Scholar
TUCKER, R. A., UNGER, E. R., HOLLOWAY, B. P. & SWAN, D. C. (2001). Real-time PCR-based fluorescent assay for quantitation of human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16, and 18. Molecular Diagnosis 6, 3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WIDADA, J., NOJIRI, H., KASUGA, K., YOSHIDA, T., HABE, H. & OMORI, T. (2001). Quantification of the carbazole 1,9a-dioxygenase gene by real-time competitive PCR combined with co-extraction of internal standards. FEMS Microbiology Letters 20, 5157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZHONG, K. J. & KAIN, K. C. (1999). Evaluation of a colorimetric PCR-based assay to diagnose Plasmodium falciparum malaria in travelers. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37, 339341.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 31 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Comparative assessment of conventional PCR with multiplex real-time PCR using SYBR Green I detection for the molecular diagnosis of imported malaria
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Comparative assessment of conventional PCR with multiplex real-time PCR using SYBR Green I detection for the molecular diagnosis of imported malaria
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Comparative assessment of conventional PCR with multiplex real-time PCR using SYBR Green I detection for the molecular diagnosis of imported malaria
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *