Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:40:54.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paleoecology and Taphonomy of Recent to Pleistocene Intertidal Deposits, Gulf of California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Karl W. Flessa  and
A. A. Ekdale
Karl W. Flessa
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
A. A. Ekdale
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Get access

Extract

The purpose of this field trip is to examine sedimentary environments, fauna, and Pleistocene deposits in the northeastern Gulf of California. The coastal area experiences tides of up to 8 meters in amplitude, the Gulf harbors a rich invertebrate fauna, especially molluscs, crustaceans, and echinoderms, and the arid climate of the region makes for a distinctive sedimentary regime. Adjacent fossiliferous Pleistocene deposits provide a glimpse into both ancient habitats and taphonomic processes. In short, the area is an excellent natural laboratory – a laboratory for the study of Recent animal-sediment relations, sedimentary processes, and taphonomy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 2: Paleoecology and Taphonomy of Pleistocene to Recent Intertidal Deposits, Gulf of California , 1987 , pp. 2 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anderson, D.L., 1971. The San Andreas Fault. Scientific American, 225 (no. 5): 52–68.Google Scholar
Beckvar, N. 1986. Stratigraphy, taphonomy, and fauna-substrate associations in a Gulf of California Pleistocene marine terrace near Punta Chueca, Sonora, Mexico. (M.S. prepublication manuscript). University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 98 p.Google Scholar
Bernat, M., Gaven, C., and Ortleib, L. 1980. Datation dépots littoraux du dernier Interglaciaire (Sangamon) sur lat cote orientale due Golfe de Californie, Mexique. Société Géologique de France, Bulletin, ser. 7, 22: 219–224.Google Scholar
Brusca, R.C. 1980. Common Intertidal Invertebrates of the Gulf of California. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona 513 p.Google Scholar
Chronic, H. 1983. Roadside Geology of Arizona. Mountain Press, Missoula, Montana, 314 p.Google Scholar
Curray, J.R., Moore, D.G., Aguaryo, J.E., Aubry, M.-P., Einsele, G., Fornari, D., Gieskes, J., Guerrero-Garcia, J., Kastner, M., Kelts, K., Lyle, L.M., Matoba, Y., Molina-Cruz, A., Niemitz, J., Saunders, A., Schrader, H., Simonett, B.R.T., and Vacquier, V. 1982. Guaymas Basin: Sites 477, 478, and 481, in Curray, J.R., and others, Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 64, pt. 1, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., p. 211–415.Google Scholar
Ekdale, A.A. 1978. Holocene ichnofacies from the northern Gulf of California and possible analogues in the Cretaceous of Utah [abs.]: American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists – Rocky Mountain Section, Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, p. 24.Google Scholar
Ekdale, A.A., Bromley, R.G., and Pemberton, S.G. 1984. Ichnology – Trace fossils in Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Short Course Notes 15, 317 p.Google Scholar
Flessa, K.W., and Brown, T. 1983. Selective solution of macroinvertebrate calcareous hard parts – a laboratory study. Lethaia 16: 193–205.Google Scholar
Hertlein, L.G., and Emerson, W.K. 1956. Marine Pleistocene invertebrates from near Puerto Peñasco, Sonora, Mexico. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 12: 154–175.Google Scholar
Jones, P.L. 1975. Petrology and petrography of Beachrock (Pleistocene?), Sonoran coast, northern Gulf of California (). University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 47 p.Google Scholar
Keen, A.M. 1971. Seashells of Tropical West America, 2nd ed. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1064 p.Google Scholar
Larson, R.L., Menard, H.W., and Smith, S.M. 1968. Gulf of California; a result of ocean-floor spreading and transform faulting: Science, 161: 781–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, D.J. II. 1981. Genesis and geochronology of alkaline volcanism in the Pinacate volcanic field, northwestern Sonora, Mexico (). University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 248 p.Google Scholar
McKee, E.D. 1957. Primary structures in some recent sediments (U.S. and Mexico). American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 41: 1704–1747.Google Scholar
McKee, E.D. 1965. Experiments on ripple lamination, in Middleton, G.V., ed., Primary sedimentary structures and their hydrodynamic interpretation. Society of Economic Geologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 12: 66–83.Google Scholar
Meldahl, K.H. 1987, Sedimentologic and taphonomic implications of biogenic stratification. Palaios, in press.Google Scholar
Moore, D.G., and Curray, J.R. 1982. Objectives of drilling on young passive continental margins; application to the Gulf of California, in Curray, J.R., and others, Initial reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, v. 64, pt. 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., p. 27–34.Google Scholar
Myers, A.C. 1970. Some ichnological observations on the tube of Diopatra cuprea (Bosc.); Polychaeta, Onuphidae, in Crimes, T.P., and Harper, J.C., eds., Trace Fossils. Seel House Press, Liverpool, p. 331–334.Google Scholar
Myers, A.C. 1972. Tube-worm-sediment relationships of Diopatra cuprea (polychaeta: Onuphidae). Marine Biology, 11: 255–261.Google Scholar
Ortleib, L. 1981a. Recent investigations on Quaternary geology of the coast of central Sonora, Mexico, in Ortlieb, L., and Roldan, J., eds., Geology of northwestern Mexico and southern Arizona, field guides and papers. Instituto Geologia, Universidad Nacional Autònoma de Mexico, Hermosillo, Mexico, p. 137–149.Google Scholar
Ortleib, L. 1981b. Pleistocene interglacial high stands of sea level in the Gulf of California. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 13: 99.Google Scholar
Pepe, P. 1983. Bioerosion by a polychaete annelid, Eunice afra Peters, at Puerto Peñasco, Gulf of California, Mexico (). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 179 p.Google Scholar
Rose, M.W. 1975. Sedimentology of Estero la Cholla, northwest coast of Sonora, Mexico (). University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 99 p.Google Scholar
Sandusky, C.L. 1979. Sedimentology of Estero Marua, Sonora, Mexico. ). University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 84 p.Google Scholar
Stearley, R.F., and Ekdale, A.A. 1984. Bioerosion in the rocky intertidal zone of the northern Gulf of California [abs.]: American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, – Rocky Mountain Section, Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, p. 20.Google Scholar
Stearley, R.F. 1986. Effects of periodic burial and exhumation by storms on endolithic communities, northern Gulf of California [abs]: American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Annual Meeting, Atlanta, p. 651–652.Google Scholar
Stump, T.E. 1975. Pleistocene molluscan paleoecology and community structure of the Puerto Libertad region, Sonora, Mexico. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 17: 177–226.Google Scholar
Van Andel, T.H. 1964. Recent marine sediments of the Gulf of California, in Van Andel, T.H., and Shor, G.G. Jr., eds., Marine Geology of the Gulf of California. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 3: 216–310.Google Scholar
Watson, M.E. 1979. Post-mortem effects on molluscan assemblages in a tidal flat environment [M.S. prepublication manuscript]. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 31 p.Google Scholar