Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-xbbwl Total loading time: 0.639 Render date: 2021-03-02T06:42:24.512Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

The role of ponds as feeding habitat for an umbrella species: best management practices for the black stork Ciconia nigra in Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2011

Rubén Moreno-Opo
Fundación CBD-Habitat, Gustavo Fernández Balbuena, 2 E-28002, Madrid, Spain.
Mariana Fernández-Olalla
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Francisco Guil
Fundación CBD-Habitat, Gustavo Fernández Balbuena, 2 E-28002, Madrid, Spain.
Ángel Arredondo
Fundación CBD-Habitat, Gustavo Fernández Balbuena, 2 E-28002, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael Higuero
Fundación CBD-Habitat, Gustavo Fernández Balbuena, 2 E-28002, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Martín
Fundación CBD-Habitat, Gustavo Fernández Balbuena, 2 E-28002, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Soria
Fundación CBD-Habitat, Gustavo Fernández Balbuena, 2 E-28002, Madrid, Spain.
José Guzmán
Fundación CBD-Habitat, Gustavo Fernández Balbuena, 2 E-28002, Madrid, Spain.
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]


To establish recommendations for wetland management that promote wildlife diversity in Mediterranean habitats we examined the factors that determine feeding habitat selection by the black stork Ciconia nigra in ponds. The black stork is considered an umbrella species because it is threatened, requires large foraging ranges in priority areas, is selective in its choice of diet and nesting sites, and inhabits a characteristic biological community with endemic and threatened taxa. Eighty-five ponds were monitored in central and western Spain to detect the stork feeding. At the same time, pond variables that could affect black stork feeding preferences were periodically evaluated. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyse principal components obtained from groups of factors related to structural, location and ecological conditions. The black stork selects ponds distant from roads, with a large surface area, high water level, shallow shores, low turbidity, few traces of wild ungulates on the shores, a high diversity of fish and amphibian species, and a vegetated perimeter, in flat and open areas. Potential factors affecting feeding behaviour are discussed. We suggest measures for pond construction and management that could favour this species in particular and biodiversity in general in the Mediterranean environment.

Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2011


Habitat destruction or alteration is considered the main cause of biodiversity loss (Laurence & Useche, Reference Laurence and Useche2009) and, because of the high rate of such destruction, it is necessary to evaluate management priorities for the conservation of ecological processes and biological complexity (Balmford et al., Reference Balmford, Crane, Dobson, Green and Mace2005). In the case of species associated with aquatic environments, isolation resulting from the loss of interconnected aquatic habitats is one of the most significant factors influencing their decline (Finn et al., Reference Finn, Bogan and Lytle2009; Griffiths et al., Reference Griffiths, Sewell and McCrea2010). It is therefore important to evaluate the ability of temporary or small ponds to meet the breeding, resting or feeding needs of species associated with aquatic environments (Brainwood & Burgin, Reference Brainwood and Burgin2009; Pinto-Cruz et al., Reference Pinto-Cruz, Molina, Barbour, Silva and Espírito-Santo2009). Unlike large water bodies, the role of small water bodies as hotspots has not been evaluated until recently (Gómez-Rodríguez et al., Reference Gómez-Rodríguez, Díaz-Paniagua, Serrano, Florencio and Portheault2009). In the Northern Hemisphere, although the number of natural ponds and lagoons is declining (Gallego-Fernández et al., Reference Gallego-Fernández, García-Mora and García-Novo1999), the availability of man-made water bodies has increased but they are generally subject to a high degree of various types of disturbance (Oertli et al., Reference Oertli, Céréghino, Hull and Miracle2009).

Man-made ponds are created in the Mediterranean basin mainly to supply the needs of wild ungulates and livestock and for irrigated agriculture. These ponds have different characteristics depending on their use, and their ecology varies depending on the intensity of use, the species present, human pressure, and the nature of the surrounding areas (Declerck et al., Reference Declerck, De Bie, Ercken, Hampel, Schrijvers and Van Wichelen2006). Man-made ponds are designed and managed mostly from an economic point of view and do not take into account environmental criteria. There is a lack of detailed information of the requirements of secondary consumer species at forest ponds but such information is more widely available for agricultural ponds (Paracuellos et al., Reference Paracuellos, Castro, Nevado, Oña, Matamala, García and Salas2002; Sebastián-González et al., Reference Sebastián-González, Sánchez-Zapata and Botella2010).

One way to assess habitats of high conservation priority is to determine the presence of threatened, key or umbrella species (Suter et al., Reference Suter, Graf and Hess2002; Larsen et al., Reference Larsen, Bladt and Rahbek2007; Delibes-Mateos et al., Reference Delibes-Mateos, Delibes, Ferreras and Villafuerte2008). This is based on the principle that ecosystem protection can be optimized by conservation of the ecological requirements of these species (Lambeck, Reference Lambeck1997). Among these requirements obtaining sufficient, suitable food is crucial and largely depends on the availability, abundance and quality of food resources (Newton, Reference Newton1998; Begon et al., Reference Begon, Harper and Townsend1999). Adaptive mechanisms such as skill, experience and plasticity to resource variation are developed by some umbrella species to avoid negative affects on population parameters (Costillo et al., Reference Costillo, Corbacho, Morán and Villegas2007).

The black stork Ciconia nigra is a long-distance migratory species whose breeding distribution includes the Palaearctic and southern Africa (Del Hoyo et al., Reference Del Hoyo, Elliot and Sargatal1992). The western limit of its range is in the Iberian Peninsula, where the breeding population is estimated to be 405–483 pairs (Cano et al., Reference Cano, Franco, Pacheco, Reis, Rosa and Fernández2006). Although the black stork is categorized as Least Concern globally (BirdLife International 2009) it is considered as Vulnerable in Portugal and Spain (Almeida et al., Reference Almeida, Catry, Encarnaçao, Franco, Granadeiro, Lopes, Cabral, Almeida, Almeida, Dellinger, Ferrand de Almeida and Oliveira2005; Ministry of the Environment, Rural and Marine Affairs, 2009). The species is considered an umbrella species (Lambeck, Reference Lambeck1997; Fleishman et al., Reference Fleishman, Blair and Murphy2001; Roberge & Angelstam, Reference Roberge and Angelstam2004) because of its large foraging range (Jiguet & Villarrubias, Reference Jiguet and Villarrubias2004) and the specificity of its requirements for food and nesting sites (Lôhmus & Sellis, Reference Lôhmus and Sellis2003; Seddon & Leech, Reference Seddon and Leech2008). The black stork’s habitat is in areas with high conservation status that are also important for many other species (Simberloff, Reference Simberloff1998; Vlachos et al., Reference Vlachos, Bakaloudis, Alexandrou, Bontzorlos and Papakosta2008), some of which are endemic to the Mediterranean region (Elvira, Reference Elvira1995; Rodríguez-Prieto & Fernández-Juricic, Reference Rodríguez-Prieto and Fernández-Juricic2004; Bernardos et al., Reference Bernardos, García-Barriuso, Sánchez-Anta and Amich2007). The black stork is a secondary consumer in the trophic chain, requiring invertebrate, amphibian, reptile and fish prey in various types of wetlands and grasslands (Ferrero & Pizarro, Reference Ferrero and Pizarro2003; Hampl et al., Reference Hampl, Bures, Baláz, Bobek and Pojer2005). The species is sensitive to habitat alteration and is particularly affected by human disturbances, such that its protection requires the promotion of best management practices for the environment on which it depends (Rosenvald & Lôhmus, Reference Rosenvald and Lôhmus2003) and the maintenance of a broad network of land of favourable conservation status (BirdLife International, 2004).

Detailed knowledge of a species’ selection of foraging habitat is essential for designing habitat management for conservation purposes (Manly et al., Reference Manly, MacDonald and Thomas1993; Zuberogoitia et al., Reference Zuberogoitia, Martínez, Martínez, Zabala, Calvo and Castillo2006; Paiva et al., Reference Paiva, Ramos, Martins, Almeida and Carvalho2007). For the black stork several studies have indicated that calm stretches of streams and rivers, natural or man-made ponds, and reservoir tails near forested areas are the species’ main feeding sites during the breeding season (Schneider-Jacoby, Reference Schneider-Jacoby1999; Ferrero & Pizarro, Reference Ferrero and Pizarro2003). However, research has not addressed the variables contributing to this species’ selection of feeding locations.

This study aimed to determine the characteristics of ponds and their surrounding areas that influence selection of feeding habitat by the black stork. Our goal is to recommend best management practices in pond construction or restoration to improve the conservation status of the communities inhabiting these aquatic hotspots.

Study area

We studied 85 ponds in central and western Spain (Fig. 1) on 21 privately owned estates in seven Special Protected Areas. We first inventoried and determined the location of wetlands on the estates and then selected five natural and 80 man-made ponds. The area includes forests with Mediterranean scrub and an agrosilvopastoral mosaic, dominated by tree species of the genus Quercus (Q. rotundifolia and Q. suber) and a shrub layer (principally Cistus ladanifer, Genista sp. and Erica sp.).

Fig. 1 The study area in Spain, with the location of the 85 studied ponds (black dots). The grey shading indicates Special Protected Areas for birds.


Black stork surveys

Data were collected during March–September from 2004 to 2007, coinciding with the presence of the black stork in the study area. The ponds were visited monthly to assess the presence of the stork, and only observations of actively feeding individuals were considered. The entire water surface was surveyed using telescopes and binoculars, mostly during 4 hours after sunrise and 2 hours prior to sunset, the most active feeding time of this species (Moreno-Opo et al., Reference Moreno-Opo, Arredondo, Soria, Guil, Higuero and Guzmán2009). Black storks were aged according to plumage and the colouration of unfeathered parts (i.e. beak, legs and eye ring) and classified as juveniles (birds in their first year of life), subadults (birds 2–3 years old) or adults (4 years or older; Cramp, Reference Cramp1998; Ferrero & Pizarro, Reference Ferrero and Pizarro2003).

Data collection

Previous studies have suggested that location, topography, habitat quality, human disturbances, pond productivity, vegetation and food availability may determine the feeding preferences of the black stork (Hancock et al., Reference Hancock, Kushlan and Kahl1992; Cramp, Reference Cramp1998). A total of 17 variables that provide information on these topics were selected (Table 1). Eight of the variables were measured monthly (time-varying variables) and nine, related to the characteristics of each pond (time-invariant variables), were measured once only, where necessary using ArcView v. 3.1 (ESRI, Redlands, USA). For the continuous time-varying variables the mean of all sampling occasions was calculated.

Table 1 The 17 measured variables, ordered by the three groups of variables used in the PCA (see text for details), to evaluate pond selection made by the black stork Ciconia nigra in central and western Spain.

1 Time-invariant variables

2 Time-varying variables

Statistical analyses

The dependent variable was the presence or absence of black storks; the species was considered present at a pond if it was recorded feeding during any visit. We calculated Spearman’s rank coefficients to check for correlation among the 17 predictor variables. Then, because of potential collinearity, and to reduce the number of variables, we performed a principal components analyses (PCA) for each of three groups of variables (structural, location and ecological conditions; Table 1); this grouping facilitates ecological interpretation of the resulting principal components (Crawley, Reference Crawley2007; Williams et al., Reference Williams, Acevedo, Gortázar, Escudero, Labarta, Marco and Villafuerte2007). PCA computes variables that are linear combinations of the original variables and that are uncorrelated with each other. However, the components calculated in each of the three groups can be correlated with components in the other groups. We therefore created a set of competing models in which we checked that components from different groups included in the same model were not correlated, using Spearman’s rank correlation test.

Competing models were fitted using Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) with binomial errors and a log link function. All models included the random factor Special Protected Area, to correct for any unmeasured variation associated with the pond location. To examine whether the presence of livestock around the ponds can influence presence of black storks we repeated the analysis using only the 44 ponds in areas with livestock.

In all cases models were simplified by removing non-significant factors (α = 5%) after checking, using the likelihood criteria, that the simplification did not significantly change the model. Once we obtained a minimal adequate model for each competing model we chose the most parsimonious using the Akaike Information Criteria (Akaike, Reference Akaike, Petrov and Csaki1973). R v. 2.8.0 (R Development Core Team, 2008) was used for all analyses.


Black storks were detected at 20 ponds (23% of the total) in 34 sightings (1.42% of surveys). Sightings were during the post-breeding (41.2%), migration (35.3%) and breeding (23.5%) periods. The total number of storks observed was 49, with adults (70.7%) more abundant than subadults (19.5%) and juveniles (9.8%). From the PCA we chose the first three components, which explained 78.6, 75.7 and 69.2% of the variation, respectively, in the structural, location and ecological conditions variable groups. Table 2 shows the influence of each variable on the three components in each of the three groups of variables.

Table 2 The eigenvalues of the PCA, for the first three principal components only (see text for details), for each of the three groups of variables (structural, location and ecological conditions; Table 1) for the 85 ponds. The components that were retained in the GLMM analysis were PC1 in the structural group, PC3 in the location group and PC2 in the ecological group (see text for details).

From these nine components (three in each of the three groups of variables), we discarded any that had significant between-group correlations (structural PC2 / location PC2: ρ = -0.37, P < 0.001; location PC2 / ecological PC3: ρ = 0.26, P = 0.018; structural PC3 / ecological PC2: ρ = -0.29, P = 0.008). We built four alternative GLIMM models and selected that with the lowest AIC as the most parsimonious. It included structural PC1 (1.0482 ± SE 0.3315; z = 3.162; P = 0.001), location PC3 (-0.9973 ± SE 0.3303; z = -2.959; P = 0.003) and ecological PC2 (-0.8214 ± SE 0.3498; z = -2.348; P = 0.019).

The results indicated that larger ponds with higher water levels and shallower shores, situated in flat open areas, are positively selected by the black stork. In terms of location, the distance to roads is the most important, with ponds farther from roads used more by the stork. A vegetated perimeter, none or few traces of wild ungulates on the shore, greater prey–species richness and lower turbidity also favour the presence of the species.

The black stork was seen at nine of the 44 ponds in estates with livestock exploitation. Following the same analysis procedure we found that the intensity of use of the ponds by livestock did not significantly influence the presence or absence of the black stork.


As direct observation was used to determine the presence of the black stork at ponds it was not possible to determine whether black storks had fed routinely at a particular pond. Nevertheless, the high number (2,380) of our visits over 4 consecutive years increased the chances of detecting the species at any particular pond. The intensity of detection could, however, be improved by using camera trapping.

Feeding habitat selection

The positive relationship between the size of a pond and its selection by feeding black storks may be due to relatively greater heterogeneity and diversity of resources in ponds with a larger water surface area (Oertli et al., Reference Oertli, Auderset, Castella, Juge, Cambin and Lachavanne2002; Kadoya et al., Reference Kadoya, Suda and Washitani2004). Similarly, large ponds hold water for a longer period, even during the summer. This is a key factor in productivity and food availability in wetlands, particularly for secondary consumers (Maheswaran & Rahmani, Reference Maheswaran and Rahmani2002; Taft et al., 2002; Holm & Clausen, Reference Holm and Clausen2006). The negative relationship between deep water around shores and the presence of feeding black storks could be explained by the hunting behaviour of the species (Kahl, Reference Kahl1971). In general, the black stork walks through wetlands trying to locate and harpoon prey in the water, such that the depth of the water cannot exceed the approximate height of their legs (Cramp, Reference Cramp1998). The positive relationship between black stork presence and ponds in flat open areas could be related to the chances of detecting potential predators or other disturbances and the possibilities of successful alert flight (Fernández-Juricic et al., Reference Fernández-Juricic, Jiménez and Lucas2002).

Ponds selected by black stork for feeding are far away from roads frequented by humans. The species is sensitive to human presence and to the effects of certain anthropogenic activities during the summer (Rosenvald & Lôhmus, Reference Rosenvald and Lôhmus2003; Cano et al., Reference Cano, Franco, Pacheco, Reis, Rosa and Fernández2006). It therefore avoids areas where it is more likely that flight would be induced, because this disturbance would reduce its foraging efficiency with respect to time investment and associated stress (Blumstein et al., Reference Blumstein, Fernández-Juricic, Zollner and Garity2005; Young et al., Reference Young, Watt, Nowicki, Alard, Clitherow and Henle2005).

Black storks select well-developed coverage of aquatic vegetation along pond perimeters. This could be related to optimization and opportunities for capturing prey: ponds with an adequate abundance of plants and macrophytes and with good water quality have generally higher productivity values (Bilton et al., Reference Bilton, McAbendroth, Bedford and Ramsay2006; Akasaka et al., Reference Akasaka, Takamura, Mitsuhashi and Kadono2010), and hence may provide a greater relative abundance of macroinvertebrates, herpetofauna and fish. The type and frequency of prey capture varies depending on the area, time and age of the bird (Domínguez et al., Reference Domínguez, González, González, Garzón and Llandres1985; Keller & Profus, Reference Keller, Profus, Meriaux, Schierer, Tombal and Tombal1992; Hampl et al., Reference Hampl, Bures, Baláz, Bobek and Pojer2005). The highest energy efficiency is obtained from medium-sized fish (Ferrero & Pizarro, Reference Ferrero and Pizarro2003; Chevallier et al., Reference Chevallier, Baillon, Robin, Le Maho and Massemin-Challet2008). In both breeding and non-breeding birds, prey availability and feeding habitat quality determine the size of the foraging range and the selection of trophic sources (Keller & Profus, Reference Keller, Profus, Meriaux, Schierer, Tombal and Tombal1992; Jiguet & Villarrubias, Reference Jiguet and Villarrubias2004). Food shortages during the breeding season influence productivity in other stork species (Dallinga & Schoenmakers, Reference Dallinga and Schoenmakers1987; Maheswaran & Rahmani, Reference Maheswaran and Rahmani2002) and therefore could also be a limiting factor in the population dynamics of the black stork.

The black stork also prefers wetland sites with a low occurrence of ungulates, which visit ponds to meet their water requirements. The presence of these wild animals can lower water quality, as well as adversely affect water visibility and food availability near the shore (Putman & Moore, Reference Putman and Moore2002; Herrero et al., Reference Herrero, García-Serrano, Couto, Ortuño and García-González2006), which is the typical feeding site for the black stork. Water turbidity has been shown to negatively affect the probability of detection and capture of prey by storks (Abrahams & Kattenfeld, Reference Abrahams and Kattenfeld1997) and may explain why ponds with low turbidity levels seem to be visited more frequently by feeding individuals.

Conservation implications

In only a few studies on small water bodies has it been possible to assess the occurrence and activity of the species that are part of the biological community (Oertli et al., Reference Oertli, Biggs, Céréghino, Grillas, Joly and Lachavanne2005). We have, however, been able to elucidate the factors that determine the presence of a predator, the black stork, in this type of wetland. The presence of black storks is evidence of the favourable ecological conditions of the wetland network close to their nesting sites (Jiguet & Villarrubias, Reference Jiguet and Villarrubias2004). Their foraging ranges are closely associated with the availability of suitable feeding sites and this is reflected, amongst other factors, in breeding success (Newton, Reference Newton1998). Hence, the scarcity of suitable wetlands constitutes one of the main limiting factors for the species (BirdLife International, 2004; Jiguet & Villarrubias, Reference Jiguet and Villarrubias2004). The negative relationship between the distance of selected ponds to permanent fluvial waters illustrates the need for an adequate interconnected network of wetlands with suitable resources, such as rivers and streams, to meet the requirements of the black stork.

There are two main conservation implications arising from this study. Firstly, it is necessary to maintain a connected networks of ponds with high ecological quality. Secondly, it is important to ensure that ponds meet several ecological, topographic and location conditions (Simon et al., Reference Simon, Snodgrass, Cassey and Sparling2009; Ritcher et al., Reference Ritcher, Crother and Broughton2009). This is particularly important in environments where the fluvial network is limited and fluctuations in water availability are pronounced (González-Gajardo et al., Reference González-Gajardo, Sepúlveda and Schlatter2009).

The management of Mediterranean wetlands has rarely taken into account the importance of ponds and their associated fauna and flora (Ministry of the Environment, 1999) but needs to do so because the number of temporary ponds with good water quality is declining (Gallego-Fernández et al., Reference Gallego-Fernández, García-Mora and García-Novo1999; Zacharias et al., Reference Zacharias, Dimitriou, Dekker and Dorsman2007). In addition, protection of natural or man-made ponds and the promotion of connections between them have been excluded from official conservation strategies, which have disregarded the value of these ponds (Oertli et al., Reference Oertli, Céréghino, Hull and Miracle2009; Pinto-Cruz et al., Reference Pinto-Cruz, Molina, Barbour, Silva and Espírito-Santo2009). It is therefore important to apply conservation actions to a habitat that is considered a priority by official legislation (Ruiz, Reference Ruiz2008).

Management recommendations

To improve the conservation of a wide range of Mediterranean wetland-associated species, including the black stork, it is essential to implement conservation actions such as restoration (Rannap et al., Reference Rannap, Lôhmus and Briggs2009; Lesbarreres et al., Reference Lesbarreres, Fowler, Pagano and Lode2010). The construction or adaptation of ponds could be carried out based on the following criteria: (1) water surface area to be as large as possible; (2) located in flat and open areas; (3) shallow water at the shores (< 30 cm); (4) located as far as possible from human roads or activity; (5) located as close as possible to other ponds; (6) absence of wild ungulates or an increase in the number of ponds in an area to reduce the concentration of ungulates; (7) promotion of the presence of amphibians and encouragement of best practices for increasing their relative abundance (Semlitsch, Reference Semlitsch2000); and (8) promotion of the presence of native fish species. To increase amphibian populations it is recommended that access to the shores by livestock is limited, good water quality maintained, the presence of water in the pond during summer prolonged, the water depth increased, aquatic vegetation encouraged and the concentration of nitrogenous compounds reduced (Galatowitsch et al., Reference Galatowitsch, Whited, Lehtinen, Husveth and Schik2000; Jakob et al., Reference Jakob, Poizat, Veith, Seitz and Crivelli2003; Egan & Paton, Reference Egan and Paton2004; Knutson et al., Reference Knutson, Richardson, Reineke, Gray, Parmelee and Weick2004; Rannap et al., Reference Rannap, Lôhmus and Briggs2009). To foster the settlement of native fish species in man-made ponds implementing introduction protocols is essential to avoid negative ecological effects (García-Jalón & Schmidt, Reference García-Jalón and Schmidt1995; Simôes et al., Reference Simôes, Arruda and Simberloff2009; Uchida & Nioue, Reference Uchida and Nioue2009).

Our recommendations have been communicated to the appropriate authorities, both in Spain and Portugal, and to the managers of the private estates that are of importance for the black stork. Various official plans for the conservation of the species in Spain (Castilla-La Mancha and Castilla y León) and Portugal (the National Action Plan) already incorporate information from the results of this study. The development and implementation of a Natura 2000 network of protected areas in the Mediterranean now takes into account the importance of temporary ponds for the conservation of several priority biodiversity elements.


This work was carried out in the framework of the monitoring programme of the LIFE–Nature project 03/NAT/E/0050 Conservation of Spanish imperial eagle, cinereous vulture and black stork, developed by CBD-Habitat Foundation with the collaboration of the Castilla-La Mancha, Extremadura and Madrid regional governments, and the Spanish Ministry of the Environment, Rural and Marine Affairs. It was co-funded by the European Commission and the Spanish Ministry of the Environment, Rural and Marine Affairs. N. El Khadir, J. Oria, M. Panadero, R. Jiménez, S. Pla, J. F. Sánchez, M. Mata, L. Ortega, L. López and L. Bolonio helped in different phases of this study. J. M. Tercero, F. Landaluce, Sir G. Grosvenor, L. Carrascosa, P. Maldonado, L. Urquijo, J. Urquijo, J. L. Ardanza, J. M. Arregui, G. Arregui, A. Rebuelta, J. Finat, R. Finat, R. Garay, A. Álvarez de Toledo, I. Oriol, R. Muguiro, M. Narváez, J. Sánchez, E. Pitarch and A. Rengifo provided the facilities to perform the monitoring. J. A. Donázar, L. M. González, A. Margalida and an anonymous referee provided useful comments.

Biographical sketches

Rubén Moreno-Opo works on the management of projects and conservation strategies for threatened species. He is interested in resolving conflicts between wildlife and socio-economic interests through scientific research and application of technology, social awareness and monitoring. Mariana Fernández-Olalla is investigating the ecological relationships between predator and prey species and the development of demographic models for threatened species. Francisco Guil develops conservation projects for the fauna of the Iberian Peninsula, especially for the limitation of non-natural mortality factors and to strengthen prey species populations and habitat management. Ángel Arredondo, Rafael Higuero, Manuel Martín, Carlos Soria and José Guzmán are field technicians with experience in monitoring and protecting threatened species of birds and mammals in Mediterranean environments.


Abrahams, M.V. & Kattenfeld, M.G. (1997) The role of turbidity as a constraint on predator–prey interactions in aquatic environments. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 169174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akaike, H. (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Second International Symposium on Information Theory (eds Petrov, B.N. & Csaki, F.), pp. 267281. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
Akasaka, M., Takamura, N., Mitsuhashi, H. & Kadono, Y. (2010) Effects of land use on aquatic macrophyte diversity and water quality of ponds. Freshwater Biology, 55, 909922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, J., Catry, P., Encarnaçao, V., Franco, C., Granadeiro, J.P., Lopes, R. et al. . (2005) Ciconia nigra. In Livro Vermelho dos Vertebrados de Portugal (eds Cabral, M.J., Almeida, J., Almeida, P.R., Dellinger, T., Ferrand de Almeida, N., Oliveira, M.E. et al. ), pp. 179180. Instituto da Conservaçao da Natureza, Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
Balmford, A., Crane, P., Dobson, P., Green, R.E. & Mace, G.M. (2005) The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences, 360, 221228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Begon, M., Harper, J.L. & Townsend, C.R. (1999) Ecologia. Omega, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Bernardos, S., García-Barriuso, M., Sánchez-Anta, M.A. & Amich, F. (2007) Composition, geographical affinities and endemism of the Iberian Peninsula orchid flora. Nordic Journal of Botany, 25, 227237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilton, D.T., McAbendroth, L., Bedford, A. & Ramsay, P.M. (2006) How wide to cast the net? Cross-taxon congruence of species richness, community similarity and indicator taxa in ponds. Freshwater Biology, 51, 578590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BirdLife International (2004) Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2009) Ciconia nigra. In IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. 2010.4. [accessed 16 February 2011].Google Scholar
Blumstein, D.T., Fernández-Juricic, E., Zollner, P.A. & Garity, S.C. (2005) Inter-specific variation of avian responses to human disturbance. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 943953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainwood, M. & Burgin, L. (2009). Hotspots of biodiversity or homogeneous landscapes? Farm dams as biodiversity reserves in Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 30433052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cano, L.S., Franco, C., Pacheco, C., Reis, S., Rosa, G. & Fernández, M. (2006) The breeding population of black stork Ciconia nigra in the Iberian peninsula. Biota, 7, 1523.Google Scholar
Chevallier, D., Baillon, F., Robin, J.P., Le Maho, Y. & Massemin-Challet, S. (2008) Prey selection of the black stork in the African wintering area. Journal of Zoology, 276, 276284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costillo, E., Corbacho, C., Morán, R. & Villegas, A. (2007) The diet of the black vulture Aegypius monachus in response to environmental changes in Extremadura (1970–2000). Ardeola, 54, 197204.Google Scholar
Cramp, S. (1998) The Birds of the Western Palaearctic on CD-ROM. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Crawley, M.J. (2007) The R Book. John Wiley, New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallinga, J.H. & Schoenmakers, S. (1987) Regional decrease in the number of white stork Ciconia ciconia in relation to food resources. Colonial Waterbirds, 10, 167177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, S., De Bie, T., Ercken, D., Hampel, H., Schrijvers, S. & Van Wichelen, J. (2006) Ecological characteristics of small farmland ponds: associations with land use practices at multiple spatial scales. Biological Conservation, 131, 523532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. & Sargatal, J. (1992) Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Delibes-Mateos, M., Delibes, M., Ferreras, P. & Villafuerte, R. (2008) Key role of European rabbits in the conservation of the Western Mediterranean basin hotspot. Conservation Biology, 22, 11061117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domínguez, L., González, J.L., González, L.M., Garzón, J. & Llandres, C. (1985) Datos sobre la alimentación de la cigüeña negra Ciconia nigra en España centro occidental. Alytes, 3, 5156.Google Scholar
Egan, R.S. & Paton, P.W.C. (2004) Within-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frogs and spotted salamanders. Wetlands, 24, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvira, B. (1995) Conservation status of endemic freshwater fish in Spain. Biological Conservation, 72, 129136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E., Jiménez, M.D. & Lucas, E. (2002) Factors affecting intra- and inter-specific variations in the difference between alert and flight distances in forested habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80, 12121220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrero, J.J. & Pizarro, V.M. (2003) La cigüeña negra en Extremadura. Junta de Extremadura, Mérida, Spain.Google Scholar
Finn, D.S., Bogan, M.T. & Lytle, D.A. (2009) Demographic stability metrics for conservation prioritization of isolated populations. Conservation Biology, 23, 11851194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleishman, E., Blair, R.B. & Murphy, D.D. (2001) Empirical validation of a method for umbrella species selection. Ecological Applications, 11, 14891501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galatowitsch, S.M., Whited, D.C., Lehtinen, R., Husveth, J. & Schik, K. (2000) The vegetation of wet meadows in relation to their land-use. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 60, 121144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallego-Fernández, J.B., García-Mora, M.R. & García-Novo, F. (1999) Small wetlands lost: a biological conservation hazard in Mediterranean landscapes. Environmental Conservation, 26, 190199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Jalón, D. & Schmidt, G. (1995) Manual práctico para la gestión sostenible de la pesca fluvial. AEMS, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Gómez-Rodríguez, C., Díaz-Paniagua, C., Serrano, L., Florencio, M. & Portheault, A. (2009) Mediterranean temporary ponds as amphibian breeding habitats: the importance of preserving pond networks. Aquatic Ecology, 43, 11791191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Gajardo, A., Sepúlveda, P.V. & Schlatter, R. (2009) Waterbird assemblages and habitat characteristics in wetlands: influence of temporal variability on species–habitat relationships. Waterbirds, 32, 225233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R.A., Sewell, D. & McCrea, R.S. (2010) Dynamics of a declining amphibian metapopulation: survival, dispersal and the impact of climate. Biological Conservation, 143, 485491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampl, R., Bures, S., Baláz, P., Bobek, M. & Pojer, F. (2005) Food provisioning and nestling diet of the black stork in the Czech Republic. Waterbirds, 28, 3540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J.A., Kushlan, J.A. & Kahl, M.P. (1992) Storks, Ibises and Spoonbills of the World. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Herrero, J., García-Serrano, A., Couto, S., Ortuño, V.M. & García-González, R. (2006) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 52, 245250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, T.E. & Clausen, P. (2006) Effects of water level management on autumn staging waterbird and macrophyte diversity in three Danish coastal lagoons. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 43994423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakob, C., Poizat, G., Veith, M., Seitz, A. & Crivelli, A.J. (2003) Breeding phenology and larval distribution of amphibians in a Mediterranean pond network with unpredictable hydrology. Hydrobiologia, 499, 5161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiguet, F. & Villarrubias, S. (2004) Satellite tracking of breeding black storks Ciconia nigra: new incomes for spatial conservation issues. Biological Conservation, 120, 153160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadoya, T., Suda, S. & Washitani, I. (2004) Dragonfly species richness on man-made ponds: effects of pond size and pond age on newly established assemblages. Ecological Research, 19, 461467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahl, M.P. (1971) Spread-wing postures and their possible functions in the Ciconidae. The Auk, 88, 715722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, M. & Profus, P. (1992) Present situation, reproduction and food of the Black Stork in Poland. In The Storks of Europe. Proceeding of the International Conference, 1991 (eds Meriaux, J.L., Schierer, C., Tombal, C. & Tombal, J.C.), pp. 227236. Institut Européen d'Ecologie, Metz, France.Google Scholar
Knutson, M.G., Richardson, W.B., Reineke, D.M., Gray, B.R., Parmelee, J.R. & Weick, S.E. (2004) Agricultural ponds support amphibian populations. Ecological Applications, 14, 669684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambeck, R.J. (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology, 11, 849856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, F.W., Bladt, J. & Rahbek, C. (2007) Improving the performance of indicator groups for the identification of important areas for species conservation. Conservation Biology, 21, 731740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurence, W.F. & Useche, D.C. (2009) Environmental synergisms and extinctions of tropical species. Conservation Biology, 23, 14271437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesbarreres, D., Fowler, M.S., Pagano, A. & Lode, T. (2010) Recovery of anuran community diversity following habitat replacement. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 148156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lôhmus, A. & Sellis, U. (2003) Nest trees: a limiting factor for the black stork population in Estonia. Aves, 40, 8491.Google Scholar
Maheswaran, G. & Rahmani, A.R. (2002) Foraging behaviour and breeding success of the black-necked stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in Dudwa National Park, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Zoology, 258, 189195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, B.F.J., MacDonald, L.L. & Thomas, D.L. (1993) Resource Selection by Animals. Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of the Environment (1999) Strategic Plan for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Wetlands in Spain. Spanish Ministry of the Environment, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Ministry of Environment, Rural and Marine Affairs (2011) Royal Decree 139/2011, of 4th February, for the development of the […] Spanish Catalogue of Endangered Species. BOE46: 20912–20951.Google Scholar
Moreno-Opo, R., Arredondo, A., Soria, C., Guil, F., Higuero, R. & Guzmán, J. (2009) La cigüeña negra Ciconia nigra en concentraciones postnupciales y migratorias ibéricas: fenología, actividad y estructura de edades. Ecología, 22, 127134.Google Scholar
Newton, I. (1998) Population Limitation in Birds. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Oertli, B., Auderset, D., Castella, E., Juge, R., Cambin, D. & Lachavanne, J.B. (2002) Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 104, 5970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oertli, B., Biggs, J., Céréghino, R., Grillas, P., Joly, P. & Lachavanne, J.B. (2005) Conservation and monitoring of pond biodiversity: introduction. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 15, 535540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oertli, B., Céréghino, R., Hull, A. & Miracle, R. (2009) Pond conservation: from science to practice. Hydrobiologia, 634, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paiva, V., Ramos, J., Martins, J., Almeida, A. & Carvalho, A. (2007) Foraging habitat selection by little terns Sterna albifrons in an estuarine lagoon system of southern Portugal. Ibis, 150, 1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paracuellos, M., Castro, H., Nevado, J.C., Oña, J.A., Matamala, J.J., García, L. & Salas, G. (2002) Repercussions of the abandonment of Mediterranean saltpans on waterbird communities. Waterbirds, 25, 492498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto-Cruz, C., Molina, J.A., Barbour, M., Silva, V. & Espírito-Santo, M.D. (2009) Plant communities as a tool in temporary ponds conservation in SW Portugal. Hydrobiologia, 634, 1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, R.J. & Moore, N.P. (2002) Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats. Mammal Review, 28, 141164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2008) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Reference Index Version 2.8.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Rannap, A., Lôhmus, A. & Briggs, L. (2009) Restoring ponds for amphibians: a success story. Hydrobiologia, 634, 8795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritcher, S.C., Crother, B.I. & Broughton, R.E. (2009) Genetic consequences of population reduction and geographic isolation in the critically endangered frog Rana servosa. Copeia, 4, 799806.Google Scholar
Roberge, J.M. & Angelstam, P. (2004) Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology, 18, 7685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Prieto, I. & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2004) Effects of direct human disturbance on the endemic Iberian frog Rana iberica at individual and population levels. Biological Conservation, 123, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenvald, R. & Lôhmus, A. (2003) Nesting of the black stork Ciconia nigra and white-tailed eagle Haliaeetus albicilla in relation to forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 185, 217223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, E. (2008) Management of Natura 2000 Habitats. 3170 Mediterranean Temporary Ponds. Technical Report 2008 07/24. European Commission.Google Scholar
Schneider-Jacoby, M. (1999) Breeding distribution and ecology of the black stork Ciconia nigra in Sava alluvial wetlands, Croatia. Acrocephalus, 20, 167176.Google Scholar
Sebastián-González, E., Sánchez-Zapata, J.A. & Botella, F. (2010) Agricultural ponds as alternative habitat for waterbirds: spatial and temporal patterns of abundance and management strategies. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56, 1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seddon, P.H. & Leech, T. (2008) Conservation short cut, or long and winding road? A critique of umbrella species criteria. Oryx, 42, 240245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semlitsch, R.D. (2000) Principles for management of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 615631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. (1998) Flagships, umbrellas and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation, 83, 247257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simôes, J.R., Arruda, C. & Simberloff, D. (2009) Introduction of non-native freshwater fish can certainly be bad. Fish and Fisheries, 10, 98108.Google Scholar
Simon, J.A., Snodgrass, J.W., Cassey, R.E. & Sparling, D.W. (2009) Spatial correlates of amphibian use of constructed wetlands in an urban landscape. Landscape Ecology, 24, 361373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, W., Graf, R.F. & Hess, R. (2002) Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus and avian biodiversity: testing the umbrella-species concept. Conservation Biology, 16, 778788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, O.W., Colwell, M.A., Isola, C.R., & Safran, R.J. (2002) Waterbird responses to experimental drawdown: implications for the multispecies management of wetland mosaics. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 9871001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, Y. & Nioue, M. (2009) Fish species richness in spring-fed ponds: effects of habitat size versus isolation in temporally variable environments. Freshwater Biology, 55, 983994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlachos, C.G., Bakaloudis, D.E., Alexandrou, O.G., Bontzorlos, V.A. & Papakosta, M.A. (2008) Factors affecting the nest site selection of the black stork Ciconia nigra in the Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli National Park, north-eastern Greece. Folia Zoologica, 57, 251257.Google Scholar
Williams, D., Acevedo, P., Gortázar, C., Escudero, M.A., Labarta, J.L., Marco, J. & Villafuerte, R. (2007) Hunting for answers: rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus population trends in north eastern Spain. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 53, 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J., Watt, A., Nowicki, P., Alard, D., Clitherow, J. & Henle, K. (2005) Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 16411671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharias, I., Dimitriou, E., Dekker, A. & Dorsman, E. (2007) Overview of temporary ponds in the Mediterranean region: threats, management and conservation issues. Journal of Environmental Biology, 28, 19.Google ScholarPubMed
Zuberogoitia, I., Martínez, J.E., Martínez, J.A., Zabala, J., Calvo, J.F. & Castillo, I. (2006) Influence of management practices on nest site habitat selection, breeding and diet of the common buzzard Buteo buteo in two different areas of Spain. Ardeola, 53, 8398.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 61
Total number of PDF views: 230 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 2nd March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.


Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The role of ponds as feeding habitat for an umbrella species: best management practices for the black stork Ciconia nigra in Spain
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The role of ponds as feeding habitat for an umbrella species: best management practices for the black stork Ciconia nigra in Spain
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The role of ponds as feeding habitat for an umbrella species: best management practices for the black stork Ciconia nigra in Spain
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *