Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:21:21.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Range fragmentation in the spectacled bear Tremarctos ornatus in the northern Andes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2004

Gustavo Kattan
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, Colombia Program, Apartado 25527, Cali, Colombia
Olga Lucía Hernández
Affiliation:
World Wildlife Fund-Colombia, Carrera 35 No. 4A-25, Cali, Colombia
Isaac Goldstein
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, Venezuela Program, Mérida, Venezuela
Vladimir Rojas
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, Colombia Program, Apartado 25527, Cali, Colombia
Oscar Murillo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
Carolina Gómez
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, Colombia Program, Apartado 25527, Cali, Colombia
Héctor Restrepo
Affiliation:
Unidad de Parques Nacionales Seccional Noroccidental, Medellín, Colombia
Francisco Cuesta
Affiliation:
Fundación EcoCiencia, Manuel Sáenz E 14-34, Quito, Ecuador
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper addresses the conservation status of the spectacled bear Tremarctos ornatus in the northern Andes (Venezuela, Colombia and Ecuador) by analysing the degree of range fragmentation and estimating habitat availability. From satellite images we constructed maps of remnant habitat blocks, consisting of Andean forest and páramo (high elevation shrublands and grassland) ecosystems. This information was overlain with a road map to determine potential isolation of populations, and a human accessibility model was used to estimate the core area of each block. This analysis revealed that the species' range is fragmented by landscape transformation and roads into 113 blocks >100 km2, representing 42% of the original extent of the bear's distribution. Forty percent of the blocks are <500 km2, and only nine are >5,000 km2. However, taking into account only core area, 56% of the blocks are <500 km2 and only six are >5,000 km2. In addition, many blocks have internal patches of colonization, further reducing habitat quality. This effect is more severe in smaller fragments, where internal disturbances constitute a high proportion of the block area. We used a high population density estimate of 0.25, a medium density of 0.11 and a low density of 0.04 bears per km2 to estimate population sizes. Twenty-nine populations are likely to have >500 individuals with the high estimate, but only nine with the medium and one with the low estimate (largest estimated population was 9,048 bears). These estimates are much lower if only the core area of blocks is used. Hunting has been identified as a major threat for many bear populations. Our analyses indicate that a regional conservation strategy for spectacled bear should focus on maintaining or increasing habitat availability in larger blocks, and reducing human-induced mortality across the region.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2004 Fauna & Flora International