Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T09:21:10.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The defence of conservation is not an attack on the poor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2004

Steven Sanderson  and
Kent Redford
Steven Sanderson
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, N.Y. 10460, USA
Kent Redford
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, N.Y. 10460, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship between poverty alleviation and biodiversity conservation continues to vex conservationists and social analysts alike. The three responses to our earlier Guest Editorial (Sanderson & Redford, 2003) help refine the arguments and shape the angles from which to approach the debate, but neither the editorial nor the responses satisfy entirely. What missing pieces must be found and fitted to the puzzle?

Type
Forum
Information
Oryx , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 146 - 147
Copyright
© 2004 Fauna & Flora International