Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Understanding Interaction in Contemporary Digital Music: from instruments to behavioural objects

  • Oliver Bown (a1), Alice Eldridge (a1) and Jon McCormack (a1)

Abstract

Throughout the short history of interactive digital music, there have been frequent calls for a new language of interaction that incorporates and acknowledges the unique capabilities of the computational medium. In this paper we suggest that a conceptualisation of possible modes of performance–time interaction can only be sensibly approached in light of the ways that computers alter the social–artistic interactions that are precursive to performance. This conceptualisation hinges upon a consideration of the changing roles of composition, performer and instrument in contemporary practice. We introduce the term behavioural object to refer to software that has the capacity to act as the musical and social focus of interaction in digital systems. Whilst formative, this term points to a new framework for understanding the role of software in musical culture. We discuss the potential for behavioural objects to contribute actively to musical culture through two types of agency: performative agency and memetic agency.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Blackwell, T. Young, M. 2004. Swarm Granulator. Proceedings of The 2004 European Workshop on Evolutionary Music and Art, Coimbra, Portugal.
Blackwell, T. Young, M. 2006. Live Algorithms for Music Manifesto. Available from http://www.timblackwell.com.
Bongers, B. 2006. Interactivation: Towards an e-cology of People, our Technological Environment, and the Arts. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Holland.
Bowers, J. Villar, N. 2006. Creating Ad Hoc Instruments with pin&play&perform. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference of New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Paris. NIME.
Burton, J. 2008. Forester: Magical Sound Creation for Mac and PC. Available from http://leafcutterjohn.com.
Chadabe, J. 2002. The Limitations of Mapping as a Structural Descriptive in Electronic Instruments. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression, Dublin, Ireland.
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, D. C. 1996. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: Penguin.
Di Scipio, A. 2003. Sound is the Interface: From Interactive to Ecosystemic Signal Processing. Organised Sound 8(3): 269277.
Kaltenbrunner, M., Jordà, S., Geiger, G. Alonso, M. 2006. The Reactable*: A Collaborative Musical Instrument. Proceedings of the Workshop on ‘Tangible Interaction in Collaborative Environments’ (TICE), at the15th International IEEE Workshops on Enabling Technologies (WETICE), Manchester, UK.
Law, J. 1992. Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity. Available from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/law-notes-on-ant.pdf.
Lewis, G. 2006. Improvising with Creative Machines. Talk given at Improvising with Computers, pre-NIME workshops. IRCAM, Paris.
Machover, T. Chung, J. 1989. Hyperinstruments: Musically Intelligent and Interactive Performance and Creativity Systems. Proceedings of the 1989 International Computer Music Conference. Columbus, USA.
Magnusson, T. 2007. The ixiQuarks: Merging Code and GUI in one Creative Space. Proceedings of the 2007 International Computer Music Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mumma, G. 1967. Creative Aspects of live Electronic Music Technology. Papers of 33rd National Convention, New York. Audio Engineering Society.
Paine, G. 2002. Interactivity, Where to from Here? Organised Sound 7(3): 295304.
Rowe, R. 1992. Interactive Music Systems: Machine Listening and Composing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schnell, N. Battier, M. 2002. Introducing Composed Instruments, Technical and Musicological Implications. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression, Dublin, Ireland.
Schroeder, F. (ed.) 2006. Contemporary Music Review. Special Issue: Bodily Instruments and Instrumental Bodies 25(1/2).
Sperber, D. 2007. Seedless Grapes: Nature and Culture. In E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds.) Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artefacts and Their Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waiswisz, M. 2008. Text and image archive for Michel Waisvisz. http://crackle.org/.
Waters, S. 2007. Performance Ecosystems: Ecological Approaches to Musical Interaction. Proceedings of EMS: The ‘Languages’ of Electroacoustic Music (EMS07), Leicester, UK.
Wessel, D. 2006. An Enactive Approach to Computer Music Performance. In Y. Orlarey (ed.) Le feedback dans la création musicale. Lyon: Studio Gramme, 9398.
Winkler, T. 2001. Composing Interactive Music: Techniques and Ideas Using Max. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed