Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T05:59:12.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Econometric Model of the Market For Fresh New England Groundfish with Emphasis on the Role of Canadian Imports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Tryggvi Felixson
Affiliation:
Central Bank of Iceland
P. Geoffrey Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
David A. Storey
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Get access

Abstract

Most econometric studies of the groundfish sector have suggested that either imports are not sensitive to U.S. prices, or that domestic prices are not much affected by imports, or both. Using a six equation model of the domestic fresh groundfish market we obtained contrasting results. For example, a 5.82 percent tariff of the type proposed by the U.S. International Trade Commission in 1986 would, if it applied to both whole fish and fillets, lower imports of fresh fish 3.7 percent and raise domestic ex-vessel prices 2.6 percent in the long run. The main reasons for the different results appear to be our inclusion of exchange rate effects and a more accurate measure of total fresh imports.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, Mahmood. “Econometric Analysis of Ex-vessel Prices for Cod, Haddock, Flounder and Scallops in Massachusetts.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 1979.Google Scholar
Bell, F. W.The Pope and the Price of Fish.” American Economic Review 58 (1968): 13461350.Google Scholar
Bockstael, Nancy. A Market Model for New England Groundfish. University of Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 422, 1977.Google Scholar
Crutchfield, S. R.Coping with Fish Imports—Alternative Policies for Canadian-U.S. Groundfish Trade.” Marine Policy 9(1985a): 214219.Google Scholar
Crutchfield, S. R.An Econometric Model of the Market of New England Groundfish.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 14(1985b): 128143.Google Scholar
Crutchfield, S. R.The Impact of Groundfish Imports on the U.S. Fishing Industry. An Empirical Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 33(1985c): 195207.Google Scholar
Diewert, W. E.Superlative Index Numbers and Consistency in Aggregation.” Econometrica 46 (1978): 883900.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. and Lampe, H. The New England Fishing Industry: Functional Markets for Finned Food Fish I and II. University of Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 379, 1965.Google Scholar
Grunfeld, Y. and Griliches, Z.Is Aggregation Necessarily Bad?Review of Economics and Statistics 42 (1960): 113.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. and Bennett, R.An Investigation into Consumer Preferences for Nine Fresh White Fish Species and the Sensory Attributes which Determine Acceptability.” Journal of Food Technology 18 (1983): 7583.Google Scholar
Houtsma, J.The Effect of Imports on U.S. Groundfish Prices.” M.S. Thesis, McGill University, 1970.Google Scholar
Kirby, Michael (Chairman). Navigating Troubled Waters. A New Policy for the Atlantic Fisheries. Report of the Task Force on Atlantic Fisheries, Ottawa, Canada, 1982.Google Scholar
Tsoa, E., Schrank, W. E. and Roy, N.U.S. Demand for Selected Groundfish Products 1967–1980.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64 (1982): 484497.Google Scholar
U.S. International Trade Commission. Conditions of Competition Affecting the Northeastern U.S. Groundfish and Scallop Industries in Selected Markets. Publication 1622, Washington, D.C., 1984.Google Scholar
Wang, D. H. and Norton, V. J.Partial Adjustment Price Models: A Study of Impact of Fish Imports on Ex-vessel Prices of New England Groundfish.” U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Working Paper, Gloucester, Massachusetts, March 1985.Google Scholar
Waugh, F. V. and Norton, V. J. Some Analyses of Fish Prices. University of Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 401, 1969.Google Scholar
White, K. J.A General Computer Program for Econometric Methods, SHAZAM.” Econometrica 46 (1978): 239240.Google Scholar