Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:36:40.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estonian conditional clauses: The degree of hypotheticality and the link to temporal and concessive clauses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2013

Helen Plado
Helen Plado*
Affiliation:
Helen Plado, Jakobi 2–430, 51014 Tartu, Estonia. helen.plado@ut.ee
Get access

Abstract

Estonian conditional clauses have previously been divided into two clear-cut groups: real and unreal, with indicative and conditional main verbs of conditional clauses, respectively. This article defends the view that it is a question of the degree of hypotheticality that a sentence conveys, and it treats hypotheticality as a continuum that includes groups of linguistic forms, which have a relatively clear core and are separated by fuzzy transition areas. Secondly, the article concentrates on the relationship between Estonian conditional clauses and temporal clauses. As these clause types have the same marker (kui), the article discusses whether it is always possible to distinguish between these two clauses and which factors are relevant for determining whether the clause is a temporal or conditional one. Thirdly, the relationship between Estonian conditional and concessive clauses is under consideration, focusing particularly on Estonian scalar concessive conditional clauses.

Keywords

adverbial clausesconcessive conditional clausesconditional clausesconditional mooddegree of hypotheticalityEstonianinfinitive as a main verbtemporal clauses
Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , May 2013 , pp. 57 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Comrie, Bernard. 1986. Conditionals: A typology. In Traugott et al. (eds.), 77–99.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetse, Eve [E.]r. 2000. Constructions with if, since, and because: Causality, epistemic stance, and clause order. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Kortmann, Bernd (eds.), Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, 111–142. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve [E.]. 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erelt, Mati. 1986. Liitlause eesti keeles. Eesti-soome kontrastiivseminar [Complex sentence in Estonian: Estonian–Finnish contrastive seminar] (Helsingi 1986). Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia.Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati, Kasik, Reet, Metslang, Helle, Rajandi, Henno, Ross, Kristiina, Saari, Henn, Tael, Kaja & Vare, Silvi. 1993. Eesti keele grammatika II. Süntaks [The grammar of Estonian II: Syntax]. Tallinn: Eesti TA Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati, Kasik, Reet, Metslang, Helle, Rajandi, Henno, Ross, Kristiina, Saari, Henn, Tael, Kaja & Vare, Silvi. 1995. Eesti keele grammatika I. Morfoloogia. Sõnamoodustus [The grammar of Estonian I. Morphology: Word formation]. Tallinn: Eesti TA Eesti Keele Instituut.Google Scholar
EKSS = Eesti keele seletav sõnaraamat [Explanatory dictionary of Estonian]. http://www.eki.ee/dict/ekss/index.cgi?Q=kui&F=M (accessed 10 March 2013)Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riitta, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja Riitta & Alho, Irja. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi [The big grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & König, Ekkehard. 1998. Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. In van der Auwera, Johan & O'Baoill, Dónall P. (eds.), Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, 563–640. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herlin, Ilona. 1998. Suomen kun [Finnish kun]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Ikola, Osmo, Palomäki, Ulla & Koitto, Anna-Kaisa. 1989. Suomen murteiden lauseoppia ja tekstikielioppia [The syntax and text grammar of Finnish dialects]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa 2001. Maailman kielten erilaisuus ja samuus [The diversity and the unity of the world's languages]. Turku: Turun yliopisto.Google Scholar
Karelson, Rudolf. 1959. Sidesõnad läänemeresoome keeltes [Conjunctions in Finnic languages]. Dissertatsioon filoloogiakandidaadi teadusliku kraadi taotlemiseks, Tartu.Google Scholar
Karu, Katrin. 2004. Mitmetähenduslikud mööndlaused eesti ja vene keeles [Polysemous concessive clauses in Estonian and Russian]. In Klaas, Birute & Tenjes, Silvi (eds.), Emakeel ja teised keeled IV [Estonian and other languages IV], 55–63. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar
Karu 2006 = Кару, Катрин 2006. Уступительные конструкции в эстонском и русском языках [Concessive constructions in Estonian and Russian]. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Koks, Helen. 2004. Eesti kirjakeele mööndtingimuslausest [The concessive conditional clauses of literary Estonian]. Keel ja Kirjandus 7, 496–503.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 1986. Conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives: Areas of contrast, overlap and neutralization. In Traugott et al. (eds.), 229–246.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Külmoja 1998 = Кюльмоя, Ирина. 1998. Условные конструкций в эстонском языке [Conditional constructions in Estonian]. In Храковский, В. С. (ed.), Типология условных конструкций [Typology of conditional constructions], 350–370. Санкт-Петербург: Наука.Google ScholarPubMed
Loorits, Oskar 1922. Tingiva ja kaudse kõneviisi minevik [Past tense of conditional and quotative mood]. Eesti Keel 5–6, 170–173.Google Scholar
Lowe, Ivan. 1987. Two ways of looking at causes and reasons. In Monaghan, James (ed.), Grammar in the Construction of Texts, 37–46. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Mägiste, Julius. 2000. Estnisches etymologisches Wörterbuch IV. 2. Auflage kuhtuma – loom. Helsinki: Finnisch-Ugrische Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Metslang, Helle. 1999. Is the Estonian and Finnish conditional actually a conditional? In Erelt, Mati (ed.), Estonian: Typological Studies III, 97–127. Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Metslang, Helle & Sepper, Maria-Maren. 2010. Mood in Estonian. In Rothstein, Björn & Thieroff, Rolf (eds.), Mood in the Language of Europe, 528–550. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monticelli, Daniele. 2003. Eesti keele tingimuslausete liigitamise semantilised aspektid [Some semantic aspects of the classification of Estonian conditional sentences]. Keel ja Kirjandus 5, 353–361.Google Scholar
Pajusalu, Renate & Pajusalu, Karl. 2004. The conditional in everyday Estonian: Its form and functions. Linguistica Uralica 4, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and Modality, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plado, Helen. 2008. Adverbiaallausete funktsioonipõhine liigitus eesti keele põhjus- ja tingimuslause näitel [Classification of adverbial clauses, based on Estonian conditional and causal clauses]. In Erelt, Mati (ed.), Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat 53 (2007), 122–145. Tallinn: Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus.Google Scholar
Plado, Helen. 2010. Eesti keeled da-infinitiivis öeldisverbiga tingimusalused [Conditional clauses with da-infinitive predicate in Estonian]. ESUKA – JEFUL 2, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plado, Helen & Lindström, Liina. 2012. Eesti keele mööndlause: markerid ning koht alistuse ja rinnastuse teljel [Estonian concessive clause: Markers and position in the chain of subordination and coordination]. In Erelt, Mati (ed.), Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat 57 (2011), 131–161. Tallinn: Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus.Google Scholar
Rannut, Lehte. 1981. Põimlause eesti keeles [Complex sentence in Estonian]. Tallinn: Valgus.Google Scholar
Rutheford, William E. 1970. Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46 (1), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabakowska, Elżbieta. 1997. Conceptualization: Conditionals as an instance of figure/ground alignment. In Athanasiadou, Angeliki & Dirven, René (eds.), On Conditionals Again, 273–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Longacre, Robert E. & Hwang, Shin Ja. 2007. Adverbial clauses. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. II: Complex Constructions, 237–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1985. Conditional markers. In Haiman, John (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 289–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, ter Meulen, Alice, Reilly, Judy Snitzer & Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.). 1986. On Conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallauri, Edoardo Lombardi. 2004. Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditionals in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17, 189–215.Google Scholar