Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:18:56.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Inter-Nordic Study of Language Acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Sven Strömqvist ,
Hrafnhildur Ragnarsdóttir ,
Olle Engstrand ,
Helga Jonsdóttir ,
Elizabeth Lanza ,
Matti Leiwo ,
Åsa Nordqvist ,
Ann Peters ,
Kim Plunkett  and
Ulla Richtoff
...Show all authors
Sven Strömqvist
Affiliation:
Sven Strömqvist, Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg, S-412 98 Göteborg, Sweden. Email sven@ling.gu.se
Get access

Abstract

The typological variation between the Nordic languages offers a “natural laboratory” for the cross-linguistic study of first language acquisition. Based on an on-going inter-Nordic project, the present article discusses research designs for the exploration of this laboratory together with pilot analyses of acquisition data across Danish, Finnish, Icelandic, Norwegian and Swedish. On the basis of evidence from longitudinal case studies, from narrative tasks, and from morphological and phonetic experiments, the project aims at producing an integrated picture of the development of grammatical morphology and its interaction with (a) the semantic domains of spatial and temporal relations and (b) the prosodic domains of tonal word accents and duration. In the present article the focus is on spatial relations and prosody. Comparisons of developmental data between languages that show considerable typological differences (Finnish vs Icelandic vs the Mainland Scandinavian languages) allow us to establish broad cross-linguistic commonalities in acquisition structure. It is shown that, across all five languages, very similar relational concepts are encoded by the first grammatical morphemes emerging in the field of spatial relations. The impact of linguistic details on acquisition structure can be explored with greater precision through comparisons between languages that show minimal typological differences (the internal differences between the Mainland Scandinavian languages: Danish vs Norwegian vs Swedish). Here, the early development of the Verb + particle construction in two Danish and two Swedish children is analysed. Language-specific effects on acquisition structure of syntactical and prosodic traits are demonstrated. Further, language-specific effects on the development of verb argument structure in spatial descriptions are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , June 1995 , pp. 3 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berman, R. A. & Slobin, D. I. 1994. Relating Events in Narrative. A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Choi, S. & Bowerman, M. 1991. Learning to Express Motion Events in English and Korean: the Influence of Language-specific Lexicalization Patterns. Cognition 41, 83–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. 1978. From Gesture to Word: On the Natural History of Deixis in Language Acquisition. In Bruner, J. & Garton, A. (eds), Human Growth and Development: Wolfson College Lectures 1976. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 85–120.Google Scholar
Clark, H. & Clark, E. 1977. Psychology and Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
de Boysson-Bardies, B. & Vihman, M. 1991. Material Evidence of Infant Selection from Target Language: a Cross-linguistic Phonetic Study. In Ferguson, C., Menn, L., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds), Proceedings of the Stanford Conference on Phonological Development. Parkton, Md.: York Press, pp. 100–125.Google Scholar
Eimas, P., Siqueland, E., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. 1992. Speech Perception in Infants. Science 171, 303–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrand, O., Williams, K., & Strömqvist, S. 1991. Acquisition of the Swedish Tonal Word Accent Contrast. Actes du XIIème Congres International des Sciences Phonétiques, Aix-Marseille: Publications de l'Université de Provence, pp. 324–327.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. 1993. Early Linguistic Experience and Phonetic Perception. Implications for theories of Developmental Speech Perception. Journal of Phonetics 21, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. & Meltzoff, A. 1982. The Bimodal Perception of Speech in Infancy. Science 218, 1138–1141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P., Williams, K., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. & Lindblom, B. 1992. Linguistic Experience Alters Phonetic Perception in Infants by 6 Months of Age. Science 255, 606–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. 1978. Final Lengthening in Speech and Music. In Gårding, E., Bruce, G. & Bannert, R. (eds), Nordic Prosody University of Lund: Department of Linguistics, pp. 85–101.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 1991. The childes Project- Tools for Analyzing Talk. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (eds) 1989. The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B & Snow, C. 1990. The Child Language Data Exchange System: An Update. Journal of Child Language 17, 457–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. & Johnson-Laird, P. 1976. Language and Perception. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. To appear. Language Typology, Individual Differences and the Acquisition of Grammatical Morphemes. In Slobin, D. I. (ed), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquistion, Vol 4. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Peters, A. & Strömqvist, S. In press. The Role of Prosody in the Acquisition of Grammatical Morphemes. In Morgan, J. L. & Demuth, K. (eds), From Signal to Syntax. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. & Menn, L. In press. False Starts and Filler Syllables: Ways to Learn Grammatical Morphemes. Journal of Child Language.Google Scholar
Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. 1991. U-shaped Learning and Frequency Effects in a Multilayered Perceptron: Implications for Child Language Acquisition. Cognition 38, 43–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plunkett, K. & Stromqvist, S. 1992. The Acquisition of Scandinavian Languages. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol 3, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 457–556.Google Scholar
Ragnarsdöttir, H. 1992. Episodic Structure and Interclausal Connectives in Icelandic Children's Narratives. In Söderbergh, R. (ed), Colloquium Paedolinguisticum Lundensis. Lund University: Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ragnarsdóttir, H. & Simonsen, H. G. 1994. Past Tense Acquisition in Children: An Experiment. Proceedings from the XlVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics and the VIIIth Conference of Nordic and general Linguistics (in press).Google Scholar
Simonsen, H. 1986. Om toåringers fonologi & system og processer. In Mjaavatn, P. & Smith, L. (eds), Barnespråk – om normal og avvikende språkutvikling. Rapport Nr 8, pp. 210–233. Trondheim: NAVF's Senter for barneforskning.Google Scholar
Sinha, C., Thorseng, L., Hayashi, M., & Plunkett, K. 1995. Comparative Spatial Semantics and Language Acquisition: Evidence from Danish, English, and Japanese. Journal of Semantics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1970. Universals of Grammatical Development in Children. In d'Arcais, G. B. Flores and Levelt, W. (eds), Advances in Psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1985a. Crosslinguistic Evidence for the Language-making Capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol 2, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1157–1256.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (ed.) 1985b. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1991. Learning to Think for Speaking: Native Language, Cognition, and Rhetorical Style. Pragmatics 1, 7–26.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (ed.) 1992. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, S. 1992. Nordens språk som förstaspråk. In Axelsson, M. & Viberg, A. (eds), Nordens språk som andraspråk. Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet, pp. 115–172.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, S. & Hellstrand, Å. 1994. Tala och skriva i lingvistiskt och didaktiskt perspektiv & en projektbeskrivning. Didaktisk Tidskrift, Göteborgs Universitet, Nr 1–2.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1983. How Language Structures Space. In Pick, H. & Acreldo, L. (eds), Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Toivainen, J. 1980. Inflectional Affixes Used by Finnish-speaking Children Aged 1–3 Years. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Wingfield, A. & Byrnes, D. L. 1981. The Psychology of Human Memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar