Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:47:19.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Group-Differentiated Rights and the Liberal Democratic State: Rethinking the Headscarf Controversy in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Yeşim Arat
Yeşim Arat*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and International Relations, Boğaziçi University. An earlier version of this article appeared in , Hagar: International Social Science Review1, no. 1 (2001). I would like to thank Anne Phillips, Afsaneh Najmabadi, and Mine Eder for their comments and criticisms and Müge Göçek for encouraging me to rework this piece in response to some liberal perceptions that I thought were misleading.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The development of liberalism with both the courage and the capacity to engage itself with a different world, one in which its principles are neither well understood nor widely held, in which indeed it is, in most places, a minority creed, alien and suspect, is not only possible, it is necessary.

-Clifford Geertz. 2000. Available Light. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, p. 258.

Over the past two decades, the debate over multiculturalism challenged the justice of neutral, “difference blind” rules in liberal democracies. Allegedly neutral institutions were shown to be implicitly biased toward the priorities, experiences, or interests of the dominant groups in the society. Criticism of difference-blind rules and claims for justice to minority groups defined the relationship between government and opposition in many contexts. Arguments for special rights to protect minorities, women, or ethnocultural groups gained legitimacy (Young 1990, Jones 1990, Phillips 1991, Taylor 1994, Kymlicka 1995, Kymlicka and Norman 2000).

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 25 , fall 2001 , pp. 31 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aktaş, Cihat. 1986. Kadının Serüveni, Istanbul: Girişim Yayınlan.Google Scholar
Arat, Yeşim. 1991. “Feminism and Islam: Considerations on the Journal Kadin ve Aile,” in Women in Modern Turkish Society, ed. Tekeli, Ş., London: Zed Books, pp. 66–78.Google Scholar
Arat, Yeşim. 1998. “Feminists, Islamists and Political Change in Turkey,” Political Psychology (19 March), pp. 117-32.Google Scholar
Arat, Yeşim. 1999. Political Islam in Turkey and Women's Organizations. Istanbul: TESEV.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, et al., eds. 1999. Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. [S.M. Okin among respondents.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çarkoğlu, Ali and Toprak, Binnaz. 2000. Türkiye’de Din, Toplum ve Siyaset, Istanbul: TESEV.Google Scholar
Demir, Hülya. 1998. İslamcı Kadının Aynadaki Sureti, Istanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.Google Scholar
Ewing, Katherine Pratt. 2000. “Legislating Religious Freedom: Muslim Challenges to the Relationship between ‘Church’ and ‘State’ in Germany and France,” Daedalus 129 (fall).Google Scholar
Göçek, Müge. 1999. “To Veil or Not to Veil,” Interventions 1, no. 4, pp. 521-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göle, Nilüfer. 1996. The Forbidden Modern. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gülalp, Haldun. 1999. “The Poverty of Democracy in Turkey: The Refah Party Episode.” New Perspectives on Turkey 21 (fall), pp. 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İlyasoğlu, Aynur. 1994. Örtülü Kimlik, Istanbul: Metis Yayınlan.Google Scholar
Jones, Kathleen. 1990. “Citizenship in a Woman-Friendly Polity,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 15, pp. 711–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1999. “Liberal Complacencies,” in Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? ed. Cohen, J.et al., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will, and Norman, Wayne, eds. 2000. Citizenship in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özdalga, Elisabeth. 1998. The Veiling Issue, Official Secularism and Popular Islam in Modern Turkey. Surrey, U.K.: Curzon Press, pp. 39–50.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1991. Engendering Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2000. “Religion, Democracy and the ‘Twin Tolerations,’” Journal of Democracy 11 (October), pp. 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition,” in Multiculturalism, ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Kılık Kıyafet ile ilgili Mevzuat ve Hukuki Değerlendirmeler (YKKM). 1998.Google Scholar