Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T08:42:07.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Architecture, Modernism and Nation-Building in Kemalist Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Sibel Bozdoğan
Sibel Bozdoğan*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Architecture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Deeply rooted in “the great transformation” brought about by capitalism, industrialization and urban life, the history of modern architecture in the West is intricately intertwined with the rise of the bourgeoisie. Modernism in architecture, before anything else, is a reaction to the social and environmental ills of the industrial city, and to the bourgeois aesthetic of the 19th century. It emerged first as a series of critical, utopian and radical movements in the first decades of the twentieth century, eventually consolidating itself into an architectural establishment by the 1930s. The dissemination of the so-called “modern movement” outside Europe coincides with the eclipse of the plurality and critical force of early modernist currents and their reduction to a unified, formalist and doctrinaire position.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 10 , Spring 1994 , pp. 37 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, Feroz. 1993. The Making of Modem Turkey. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alsac, Üstün. 1976. Türkiye'deki Mimarlik Düşüncesinin Cumhuriyet Dönemirιdeki Evrimi. Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Yayιnlari.Google Scholar
Arif, B. 1931. “LöKorbuziye'nin Muasιr Şehri,” Mimar.Google Scholar
Arif, B. 1933. “Niçin Sanatsιzιz?” Kadro, İkinci Kânun, 13.Google Scholar
Arseven, Celal Esat. 1931. Yeni Mimari. Istanbul: Agah Sabri Kitaphanesi.Google Scholar
Aslanoğlu, İnci. 1980. Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi Mimarlιğι. Ankara: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Yayιnlan.Google Scholar
Aslanoğlu, İnci. 1986. “Evaluation of Architectural Developments in Turkey Within the Socio-Economic and Cultural Framework of the 1923-38 Period” in Middle East Technical University, Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 7(2), pp. 15-41.Google Scholar
Bedrettin, B. 1933(a). “Türk īnkilap Mimarisi,” Mimar.Google Scholar
Bedrettin, B. 1933(b). “Mimarlikta İnkιlap,” Mimar.Google Scholar
Berman, M. 1992. “Why Modernism Still Matters? in Friedman, J. and Lasch, C. (eds.), Modernity and Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bozdoğan, Sibel. 1993. “Modern Architecture and Cultural Politics of Nationalism in Early Republican Turkey”, in Gaehtgens, T. W. ed. Artistic Exchange, Proceedings of the 28th. International Congress of History of Art, pp. 437-452. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Bozdoğan, Sibelet al. 1987. Sedad Hakkι Eldem: Architect in Turkey. Singapore: Concept Media/ Mimar Publications.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 1986. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.L. 1984. “America: A Soviet Ideal,” AA Files, 5, January, pp. 32-40.Google Scholar
Cuicci, Giorgio. 1981. “The Invention of the Modern Movement” in Oppositions, 24, pp. 69-89.Google Scholar
Doordan, Dennis. 1988. Building Modem Italy. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Eldem, Sedat Hakkι. 1940. “Yerli Mimariye Doğru,” Arkitekt, pp. 69-73.Google Scholar
Frampton, K. “Towards A Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance” in Foster, H. (ed.), The Anti-Aesthetic. Seattle: Bay Press, pp. 16-30.Google Scholar
Greenhalg, Paul. ed. 1990. Modernism in Design. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Hakimiyet-i, Milliye. 1930. ‘Yeni Mimari: Mimarhk Aleminde Yeni Bir Esas,” 2 Kânunisani.Google Scholar
Harp, M. 1989. “Tessenow's Architecture as National Allegory: Critique of Capitalism or Protofascism?” Assemblage, 8, February, pp. 104-123.Google Scholar
Holod, Renata and Evin, Ahmet eds. 1983. Modern Turkish Architecture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Y.K. 1934 (1981). Ankara. İstanbul: Birikim Yaymlari.Google Scholar
Karaosmanoğlu, Y.K. 1933. “Kültür ve Medeniyet,” Kadro, Mart, N. 15.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar. 1987. State and Class in Turkey. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Köker, Levent. 1990. Modernlesme, Kemalizm ve Demokrasi. İstanbul: İletişim Yaymlan.Google Scholar
Köker, Levent. 1991. Sol Kemalizme Bakiyor. Istanbul.Google Scholar
Kuban, D. 1984. “Çağdaş Kültürde Ulusal Üslup Nedir, Ne Değildir?” Mimarlιkta Türk Milli Üslubu Semineri. Istanbul: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlιğι, Eski Eserler ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü, pp. 7-13.Google Scholar
Lane, Barbara Miller. 1985. Architecture and Politics in Germany 1918-45. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mardin, Şerif. 1991. “The Just and the Unjust,” Daedalus, 120(3), Summer, pp. 113-129.Google Scholar
McLeod, M. 1983. “Architecture or Revolution: Taylorism, Technocracy and Social Change,” Art Journal, Summer, pp. 132-147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortas, A. 1936. “Evlerimiz,” Arkitekt, pp. 24-27.Google Scholar
Nalbantoğlu, Gülsüm Baydar. 1993. “Between Civilization and Culture: Appropriation of Traditional Dwelling Forms in Early Republican Turkey” in Journal of Architectural Education, 47(2), pp. 66-74.Google Scholar
Pommer, R. 1983(b). “The Flat Roof Controversy,” Art Journal, Summer.Google Scholar
Pommer, Richard and Otto, Christian. 1991. Weissenhof 1927 and the Modern Movement in Architecture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pommer, Richard ed. 1983. Revising Modernist History: The Architecture of the 1920s and 1930s. Special issue of Art Journal. 43(2).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1965. “Universal Civilization and National Cultures,” in History and Truth. Northwestern University Press, pp. 271-284.Google Scholar
Saim, S. 1928. “Mösyö Jak'ιn Asri Villasι,” Muhit.Google Scholar
Sayar, Z. 1936. “Devlet İnşaatmda Tip-plan Usulünün Mahzurlari,” Arkitekt, pp. 259-60.Google Scholar
Tuncay, Mete. 1992 (1981). Türkiye Cumhuriyetinde Tek Parti Yönetiminin Kurulmasι 1923-1931. Istanbul: Cem Yayinevi.Google Scholar
Ülken, H.Z. 1992. Türkiye'de Çağdaş Düşünce Tarihi. Istanbul: Ülken Yayιnlarι.Google Scholar
Ünsal, B. 1939. “Kübik Yapι ve Konfor,” Arkitekt, pp. 60-62.Google Scholar
Vale, Lawrence. 1992. Architecture, Power and National Identity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yerasimos, S. 1987. “The Monoparty Period,” in Schick, I. and Tonak, E. (eds.), Turkey in Transition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ziya, A. 1934. “Sanatta Nasyonalizm,” Arkitekt, pp. 51-54.Google Scholar
Zürcher, Erik. J. 1993. Turkey: A Modern History. London and New York: I.B. Tauris & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar