Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Beyond homophily: Incorporating actor variables in statistical network models

  • Tom A.B. Snijders (a1) and Alessandro Lomi (a2)

Abstract

We consider the specification of effects of numerical actor attributes, having an interval level of measurement, in statistical models for directed social networks. A fundamental mechanism is homophily or assortativity, where actors have a higher likelihood to be tied with others having similar values of the variable under study. But there are other mechanisms that may also play a role in how the attribute values of two actors influence the likelihood of a tie between them. We discuss three additional mechanisms: aspiration, the tendency to send more ties to others having high values; attachment conformity, sending more ties to others whose values are close to the “social norm”; and sociability, where those having higher values will tend to send more ties generally. These mechanisms may operate jointly, and then their effects will be confounded. We present a specification representing these effects simultaneously by a four-parameter quadratic function of the values of sender and receiver. Flexibility can be increased by a five-parameter extension. We argue that for numerical actor attributes having important effects on directed networks, these specifications may provide an improvement. An illustration is given of dependence of advice ties on academic grades, analyzed by the Stochastic Actor-oriented Model.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: Tom.Snijders@nuffield.ox.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97119.
Azoulay, P., Liu, C., & Stuart, T. (2017). Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 12231271.
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509512.
Block, P. (2015). Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle. Social Networks, 40, 163173.
Block, P. (2018). Network evolution and social situations. Sociological Science, 5, 402431.
Block, P., & Grund, T. (2014). Multidimensional homophily in friendship networks. Network Science, 2, 189212.
Brouwer, J., Flache, A., Jansen, E., Hofman, A., & Steglich, C. (2018). Emergent achievement segregation in freshmen learning community networks. Higher Education, 76, 483500.
Cohen, J. M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50, 227241.
Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity [summary report], vol. 2. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.
de Solla Price, D. J. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27, 292306.
Fienberg, S., & Wasserman, S. (1981). Categorical data analysis of single sociometric relations. In Leinhardt, S. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 156192). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Goodreau, S. M. (2007). Advances in exponential random graph (p*) models applied to a large social network. Social Networks, 29, 231248.
Gremmen, M. C., Berger, C., Ryan, A. M., Steglich, C. E., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2018). Adolescents’ friendships, academic achievement, and risk behaviors: Same-behavior and cross-behavior selection and influence processes. Child Development (in Press) doi: 10.1111/cdev.13045.
Hoff, P. D., Raftery, A. E., & Handcock, M. S. (2002). Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 10901098.
Homans, G. C. (1974). Elementary forms of social behavior. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Hunter, D. R. (2007). Curved exponential family models for social networks. Social Networks, 29, 216230.
Jones, L. E. (1983). Multidimensional models of social perception, cognition, and behavior. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 451472.
Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 87108.
Knudsen, T. (2008). Reference groups and variable risk strategies. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 66, 2236.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as social process. In Berger, M., Abel, T., and Page, C. (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 1866). New York: Van Nostrand.
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. S. (1944). Level of aspiration. In Hunt, J. (Ed.), Personality and the behavioral disorders (pp. 333378). New York: Ronald Press.
Lomi, A., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., & Torló, V. J. (2011). Why are some more peer than others? Evidence from a longitudinal study of social networks and individual academic performance. Social Science Research, 40, 15061520.
Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 395415.
Louch, H. (2000). Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations. Social Networks, 22, 4564.
Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robins, G. (2013). Exponential random graph models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175215.
McPherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415444.
McPherson, M. (2004). A Blau space primer: Prolegomenon to an ecology of affiliation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 263280.
Mercken, L., Steglich, C. E. G., Sinclair, P., Holliday, J., & Moore, L. (2012). A longitudinal social network analysis of peer influence, peer selection, and smoking behavior among adolescents in British schools. Health Psychology, 31(4), 450459.
Osgood, D. W., Ragan, D. T., Wallace, L., Gest, S. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Moody, J. (2013). Peers and the emergence of alcohol use: Influence and selection processes in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 500512.
Podolny, J. M. (1994). Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 458483.
Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., Bóda, Z., Vörös, A., & Preciado, P. (2018). Manual for Siena version 4.0. Technical report, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review ofSociology, 36, 91115.
Robins, G. (2009). Understanding individual behaviors within covert networks: The interplay of individual qualities, psychological predispositions, and network effects. Trends in Organized Crime, 12, 166187.
Robins, G., Elliott, P., & Pattison, P. (2001). Network models for social selection processes. Social Networks, 23, 130.
Sauder, M., Lynn, F., & Podolny, J. M. (2012). Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 267283.
Sauerbrei, W., Royston, P., & Binder, H. (2007). Selection of important variables and determination of functional form for continuous predictors in multivariable model building. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 55125528.
Schaefer, D. R. (2018). A network analysis of factors leading adolescents to befriend substance-using peers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 275312.
Selfhout-Van Zalk, M. H. W., Burk, W., Branje, S. J. T., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal ofPersonality, 78, 509538.
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Oxford: Harper.
Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31, 361395.
Snijders, T. A. B. (2016). The multiple flavours of multilevel issues for networks. In Lazega, E., and Snijders, T. A. B. (Eds.), Multilevel network analysis for the social sciences; theory, methods and applications (pp. 1546). Cham: Springer.
Snijders, T. A. B. (2017). Stochastic actor-oriented models for network dynamics. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4, 343363.
Snijders, T. A. B., Lomi, A., & Torló, V. (2013). A model for the multiplex dynamics of two-mode and one-mode networks, with an application to employment preference, friendship, and advice. Social Networks, 35, 265276.
Snijders, T. A. B., Pattison, P. E., Robins, G. L., & Handcock, M. S. (2006) New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36, 99153.
Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 4460.
Stokman, F. N. (2004). What binds us when with whom? Content and structure in social network analysis. Keynote Address at the SUNBELT XXIV International Network for Social Network Analysis Conference, May 13, 2004, in Portoroz (Slovenia).
Stokman, F. N., & Vieth, M. (2004). Was verbindet uns wann mit wem? Inhalt und Struktur in der Analyse sozialer Netzwerke. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft, 44, 274302.
Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H. & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 315349.
van Duijn, M. A., Snijders, T. A. B., & Zijlstra, B. H. (2004). p2: A random effects model with covariates for directed graphs. Statistica Neerlandica, 58, 234254.
Wasserman, L. (2004). All of statistics: A concise course in statistical inference. New York: Springer.
Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P. (1996). Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika, 61, 401425.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Network Science
  • ISSN: 2050-1242
  • EISSN: 2050-1250
  • URL: /core/journals/network-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed