Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Introduction of the Boxtel Formation and implications for the Quaternary lithostratigraphy of the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2017

J. Schokker
Affiliation:
TNO Built Environment and Geosciences – Geological Survey of the Netherlands , P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands Centre for Geo-ecological Research (ICG), Physical Geography Research Institute, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands
H.J.T. Weerts
Affiliation:
TNO Built Environment and Geosciences – Geological Survey of the Netherlands , P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
W.E. Westerhoff
Affiliation:
TNO Built Environment and Geosciences – Geological Survey of the Netherlands , P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
C. den Otter
Affiliation:
TNO Built Environment and Geosciences – Geological Survey of the Netherlands , P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Application of the traditional lithostratigraphic framework to subdivide the Middle- and Upper-Quaternary locally-derived fine-grained deposits in the Netherlands is problematic. Deposits of many formations cannot be distinguished from each other based on lithological characteristics and stratigraphie position alone. To overcome this problem, we present a new, well-defined lithostratigraphy for these deposits, based on detailed research in the central part of the Roer Valley Graben. This area contains an up to 35 m-thick sedimentary record of Middle- and Upper-Quaternary sand, loam and peat deposits. These have mainly been formed by aeolian and small-scale fluvial processes and have been preserved as a result of tectonic subsidence. The traditional lithostratigraphic subdivision of these deposits into three formations (Eindhoven Formation, Asten Formation and Twente Formation) was based on a combination of litho-, bio- and chronostratigraphic evidence and the presumed widespread presence of a horizon of organic-rich interglacial sediments of Eemian age. To avoid intermingling of criteria regarding lithological characteristics, genesis and age, we now incorporate all fine-grained sediments into the new Boxtel Formation. The implications for the lithostratigraphic framework in other parts of the country are explored and discussed. Eight lithostratigraphic members are introduced that describe the most characteristic parts of the formation. To fully illustrate the sedimentary sequence in the Roer Valley Graben, two new members are defined here. The Best Member incorporates alternating floodloam deposits and sandy aeolian deposits in the lower part of the Boxtel Formation. The Liempde Member includes reworked aeolian loess and sandy loess deposits (‘Brabant loam’) that occur in the upper part of the sedimentary sequence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2007

Footnotes

Henk Berendsen passed away on May 14, 2007

References

Berendsen, H.J.A., 1982. De genese van het landschap in het zuiden van de provincie Utrecht, een fysisch-geografische studie. Utrechtse Geografische Studies 10: 256 pp.Google Scholar
Bisschops, J.H., 1973. Toelichtingen bij de Geologische Kaart van Nederland 1 : 50.000. Blad Eindhoven Oost (510). Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem): 132 pp.Google Scholar
Bisschops, J.H., Broertjes, J.P. & Dobma, W., 1985. Toelichtingen bij de Geologische Kaart van Nederland 1 : 50.000. Blad Eindhoven West (51W). Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem): 216 pp.Google Scholar
De Mulder, E.F.J., Geluk, M.C., Ritsema, I., Westerhoff, W.E. & Wong, Th.E., 2003. De Ondergrond van Nederland. Wolters-Noordhoff (Groningen): 379 pp.Google Scholar
Doppert, J.W.Chr., Ruegg, G.H.J., Van Staalduinen, C.J., Zagwijn, W.H. & Zandstra, J.G., 1975. Formaties van het Kwartair en Boven-Tertiair in Nederland. In: Zagwijn, W.H. & Van Staalduinen, C.J. (eds): Toelichting bij de Geologische Overzichtskaarten van Nederland. Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem): 1156.Google Scholar
Emiliani, C. 1955. Pleistocene temperatures. Journal of Geology 63: 538578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florschütz, F. & Anker-Van Someren, A.M.H., 1956. De resultaten van het palynologisch onderzoek. In: Burek, H.D.M., (ed.): Het Jong-Kwartair op de Peelhorst en in de Westelijk van de Horst gelegen Grote Slenk. Mededelingen van de Geologische Stichting, Nieuwe Serie 10: 5563.Google Scholar
French, H.M., 1996. The periglacial environment (2nd ed.). Longman (Harlow): 341 pp.Google Scholar
Geluk, M.C., Duin, E.J.Th., Dusar, M., Rijkers, R.H.B., Van den Berg, M.W. & Van Rooijen, P., 1994. Stratigraphy and tectonics of the Roer Valley Graben. Geologie en Mijnbouw 73: 129141.Google Scholar
Griede, J.W., 1978. Het ontstaan van Frieslands Noordhoek. PhD thesis Vije Universiteit Amsterdam: 186 pp.Google Scholar
Hedberg, H.D. (ed.), 1976. International stratigraphie guide. A guide to strati-graphic classification, terminology and procedure. John Wiley and Sons (New York): 200 pp.Google Scholar
Houtgast, R.F. & Van Balen, R.T., 2000. Neotectonics of the Roer Valley Rift System, the Netherlands. Global and Planetary Change 27: 131146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooi, H., 1997. Contribution of tectonics, isostasy and natural compaction to vertical land movement in the Netherlands. Meetkundige Dienst Rijkswaterstaat, Rapportnummer MDGAP-9770: 52 pp.Google Scholar
Koster, E.A., 1982. Terminology and lithostratigraphic subdivision of (surficial) sandy eolian deposits in the Netherlands: an evaluation. Geologie en Mijnbouw 61: 121129.Google Scholar
Kuyl, O.S., 1980. Toelichtingen bij de Geologische Kaart van Nederland 1:50.000. Blad Heerlen (62W oostelijke helft, 620 westelijke helft). Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem): 206 pp.Google Scholar
Kuyl, O.S. & Bisschops, J.H., 1969. Le loess aux Pays-Bas. Supplément au Bulletin de l’Association française pour l’étude du Quaternaire: 101104.Google Scholar
Lorié, J., 1907. De voorgestelde eenheid van het IJstijdvak II. Tijdschrift van het Koninklijk Nederlandsch Aardrijkskundig Genootschap, Tweede Serie XXIV: 7194.Google Scholar
Mente, A., 1961. Het resultaat van een palynologisch onderzoek van een Eemien-afzetting bij Liessel (N.-Br.). Geologie en Mijnbouw 40: 7578.Google Scholar
Roeleveld, W., 1974. The Groningen coastal area. A study in Holocene geology and low-land physical geography. PhD thesis Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam: 252 pp.Google Scholar
Ruegg, G.H.J., 1983. Periglacial eolian evenly laminated sandy deposits in the Late Pleistocene of NW Europe, a facies unrecorded in modern sedimentological handbooks. In: Brookfield, M.E. & Ahlbrandt, T.S. (eds): Eolian sediments and processes (Developments in Sedimentology 38). Elsevier (Amsterdam): 455483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvador, A. (ed.), 1994. International stratigraphie guide. A guide to stratigraphie classification, terminology and procedure (2nd ed.). The International Union of Geological Sciences / The Geological Society of America (Trondheim/Boulder): 214 pp.Google Scholar
Schokker, J., Cleveringa, P. & Murray, A.S., 2004. Palaeoenvironmental reconstruction and 0SL dating of terrestrial Eemian deposits in the southeastern Netherlands. Journal of Quaternary Science 19: 193202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schokker, J. & Koster, E.A., 2004. Sedimentology and facies distribution of Pleistocene cold-climate aeolian and fluvial deposits in the Roer Valley Graben (southeastern Netherlands). Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 15: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schokker, J., Cleveringa, P., Murray, A.S. & Westerhoff, W.E., 2005. An 0SL dated Middle and Late Quaternary sedimentary record in the Roer Valley Graben (southeastern Netherlands). Quaternary Science Reviews 24: 22432264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, N.J. & Opdyke, N.D., 1973. Oxygen isotope and palaeomagnetic stratigraphy of equatorial Pacific core V28-238: oxygen isotope temperatures and ice volumes on a 105 and 106 year scale. Quaternary Research 3: 3955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staring, W.C.H., 1860. De bodem van Nederland (part 2). Kruseman (Haarlem): 480 pp.Google Scholar
Tesch, P., 1942. De geologische kaart van Nederland en hare beteekenis voor verschillende doeleinden. Mededeelingen van de Geologische Stichting, Serie D-l: 139.Google Scholar
TNO, , 2007. Lithostratigrafische Nomenclátor Ondiepe Ondergrond Nederland. Available at: www.nitg.tno.nl/nomenclatorShallow/start/start/introduction/index.html Visited at: August 19th, 2007.Google Scholar
Törnqvist, T.E., Weerts, H.J.T. & Berendsen, H.J.A., 1994. Definition of two new members in the upper Kreftenheye and Twente Formations (Quaternary, the Netherlands): a final solution to persistent confusion? Geologie en Mijnbouw 72: 251264.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, M.W., 1994. Neo-tectonics of the Roer Valley Rift System. Style and rate of crustal deformation inferred from syn-tectonic sedimentation. Geologie en Mijnbouw 73: 143156.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, J., 1988. Cryoturbations. In: Clark, M.J. (ed.) Advances in Periglacial Geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons (Chichester): 179198.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, J. & Van den Broek, P., 1982. Weichselian convolution phenomena and processes in fine sediments. Boreas 11: 299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Toorn, J.C., 1967. Toelichtingen bij de Geologische Kaart van Nederland 1 : 50.000. Blad Venlo West (52W). Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem): 163 pp.Google Scholar
Van der Hammen, T., 1951. Lateglacial ñora and periglacial phenomena in the Netherlands. Leidse Geologische Mededelingen XVII: 71184.Google Scholar
Van der Hammen, T., 1971. The Upper Quaternary stratigraphy of the Dinkel valley. In: Van der Hammen, T. & Wijmstra, T.A. (eds): The Upper Quaternary of the Dinkel valley (Twente, Eastern Overijssel, the Netherlands). Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, Nieuwe Serie 22: 55213.Google Scholar
Van der Hammen, T., Maarleveld, G.C., Vogel, J.C. & Zagwijn, W.H., 1967. Stratigraphy, climatic succession and radiocarbon dating of the Last Glacial in the Netherlands. Geologie en Mijnbouw 46: 7995.Google Scholar
Van der Vlerk, I.M. & Florschütz, F., 1953. The palaeontological base of the subdivision of the Pleistocene in the Netherlands. Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Natuurkunde, Eerste Reeks XX (2): 358.Google Scholar
Van Dorsser, H.J., 1956. Het landschap van Westelijk Noordbrabant. PhD thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht: 133 pp.Google Scholar
Van Huissteden, J., 1990. Tundra rivers of the Last Glacial: sedimentation and geomorphological processes during the Middle Pleniglacial in Twente, Eastern Netherlands. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 44 (3): 3138.Google Scholar
Vink, A.P.A., 1949. Bijdrage tot de kennis van loess en dekzanden, in het bijzonder van de zuidoostelijke Veluwe. PhD thesis, Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen: 147 pp.Google Scholar
Vink, A.P.A. & Sevink, J., 1971. Soils and paleosols in the Lutterzand. In: Van der Hammen, T. & Wijmstra, T.A. (eds): The Upper Quaternary of the Dinkel valley. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, Nieuwe Serie 22: 165185.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1961. Vegetation, climate and radiocarbon datings in the Late Pleistocene of the Netherlands. Part I: Eemian and Early Weichselian. Mededelingen Geologische Stichting, Nieuwe Serie 14: 1545.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1974. Vegetation, climate and radiocarbon datings in the Late Pleistocene of the Netherlands. Part II: Middle Weichselian. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, Nieuwe Serie 25-3: 101110.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1989. The Netherlands during the Tertiary and the Quaternary: a case history of coastal lowland evolution. Geologie en Mijnbouw 68: 107120.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., Van Montfrans, H.M. & Zandstra, J.G., 1971. Subdivision of the Cromerian in the Netherlands; pollen analysis, palaeomagnetism and sedimentary petrology. Geologie en Mijnbouw 50: 4158.Google Scholar
Ziegler, P.A., 1994. Cenozoic rift system of western and central Europe: an overview. Geologie en Mijnbouw 73: 99127.Google Scholar
Zonneveld, J.I.S., 1947. Het Kwartair van het Peelgebied en naaste omgeving. Mededeelingen van de Geologische Stichting, Serie C-VI-3: 1223.Google Scholar
Zonneveld, J.I.S., 1958. Litho-stratigrafische eenheden in het Nederlandse Pleistoceen. Mededelingen van de Geologische Stichting, Nieuwe Serie 12: 3164.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 129 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th June 2017 - 15th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access
Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-xbf5p Total loading time: 0.592 Render date: 2021-01-15T21:55:02.049Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Fri Jan 15 2021 21:50:49 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Introduction of the Boxtel Formation and implications for the Quaternary lithostratigraphy of the Netherlands
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Introduction of the Boxtel Formation and implications for the Quaternary lithostratigraphy of the Netherlands
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Introduction of the Boxtel Formation and implications for the Quaternary lithostratigraphy of the Netherlands
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *