Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-06T15:34:17.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Approaches to Kurdish Autonomy in the Middle East

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2019

Cengiz Gunes*
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences & Global Studies, The Open University, London, UK.
*
*Corresponding author. Email: c.gunes@open.ac.uk

Abstract

This article focuses on the approaches and challenges to Kurdish autonomy in Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. Accommodation of Kurdish rights via autonomy arrangements has a long history as an idea but negotiating actual autonomy agreements was often a fruitless task. However, the weakening of state power in Iraq since 1991 and in Syria since 2011 has created opportunities for Kurdish movements in these states to develop and consolidate their autonomous administrations. Consequently, in recent years, the debate on Kurdish autonomy in the Middle East has taken center stage in the regional political discourse. This article first discusses the literature on approaches to autonomy to set out the main models and assess their strengths and weaknesses. It then provides accounts of the models of autonomy that are either practiced or proposed by Kurdish actors or entities in Iraq, Turkey, and Syria. The final section assesses the ability and suitability of the proposed or practiced models for the accommodation of Kurdish rights and demands and develops insights into how the current difficulties preventing the accommodation of Kurdish rights in the Middle East may be overcome.

Type
Special Issue Article
Copyright
© Association for the Study of Nationalities 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abushov, Kavus. 2015. “Autonomy as a Possible Solution to Self-determination Disputes: Does It Really Work?” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 22 (2): 182201.Google Scholar
Akkaya, Ahmet Hamdi, and Jongerden, Joost. 2014. “Confederalism and Autonomy in Turkey: The Kurdistan Workers’ Party and the Reinvention of Democracy.” In The Kurdish Question in Turkey: New Perspectives on Violence, Representation and Reconciliation, edited by Gunes, Cengiz and Zeydanlıoğlu, Welat, 186204. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allsopp, Harriet. 2015. The Kurds of Syria: Political Parties and Identity in the Middle East. London: I.B.Tauris.Google Scholar
Anderson, Liam, and Stansfield, Gareth. 2009. Crisis in Kirkuk: The Ethnopolitics of Conflict and Compromise. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Liam. 2013. “Power Sharing in Kirkuk: The Need for a Compromise.” In Power Sharing in Deeply Divided Places, edited by McEvoy, Joanne and O’Leary, Brendan, 364385. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
News, ANF. 2017a. “Northern Syria Made up of 3 Federal Regions Now.” https://anfenglish.com/women/northern-syria-made-up-of-3-federal-regions-now-21474.html. (Accessed October 10, 2017.)Google Scholar
News, ANF. 2017b. “People Voted in Democratic Northern Syria Federation Elections.” https://anfenglish.com/rojava/people-voted-in-democratic-northern-syria-federation-elections-22286.html. (Accessed September 22, 2018.)Google Scholar
Bakir, Falah Mustafa. 2018. “To End Conflict in Iraq, Kurds, Shias and Sunnis Need to Recognize Common Ties and Reorganize.” http://thehill.com/opinion/international/367519-to-end-conflict-in-iraq-kurds-shias-and-sunnis-need-to-recognize-common. (Accessed January 8, 2018.)Google Scholar
Barkey, Karen, and Gavrilis, George. 2016. “The Ottoman Millet System: Non-Territorial Autonomy and Its Contemporary Legacy.” Ethnopolitics 15 (1): 2442.Google Scholar
Barter, Shane Joshua. 2018. “Rethinking Territorial Autonomy.” Regional Studies 52 (2): 298309.Google Scholar
BDP. 2011. “Democratic Özerklik Projesi.” https://bdpblog.wordpress.com/2011/05/04/demokratik-ozerklik-projesi/. (Accessed January 6, 2018.)Google Scholar
BDP. 2008. “Barış ve Demokrasi Partisi Programı.” https://bdpblog.wordpress.com/parti-programimiz/. (Accessed September 2018.)Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Hug, Simon, Schädel, Andreas, and Wucherpfennig, Julian. 2015. “Territorial Autonomy in the Shadow of Conflict: Too Little, too Late?” American Political Science Review, 109(2): 354370.Google Scholar
Cheneval, Francis, and Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2013. “The Case for Demoicracy in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (2): 334350.Google Scholar
Comparative Constitutions Project. 2017. “Iraq’s Constitution of 2005.” https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Iraq_2005.pdf?lang=en. (Accessed January 10, 2018.)Google Scholar
Davison, John. 2017. “Some Syrian Schools Erase Assad but Tensions Rise over Kurdish.” https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-kurds/some-syrian-schools-erase-assad-but-tensions-rise-over-kurdish-idUSKCN1BI1X6. (Accessed September 25, 2018.)Google Scholar
DFNS. 2016. “Social Contract of the Democratic Federalism of Northern Syria.” http://vvanwilgenburg.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/social-contract-of-democratic.html. (Accessed October 14, 2017.)Google Scholar
DTK. 2012. Kürt Sorununun Çözümü İçin Demokratik Özerklik. Diyarbakır: Aram Publishers.Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash. 2005. “Autonomy as a Participatory Right in the Modern Democratic State.” In Beyond a One-Dimensional State: An Emerging Right to Autonomy, edited by Skurbaty, Zelim A., 345. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Gunes, Cengiz. 2019. The Kurds in a New Middle East: The Changing Geopolitics of a Regional Conflict. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Gunes, Cengiz. 2018. “The Rise of the Pro-Kurdish Democratic Movement in Turkey.” In The Routledge Handbook on the Kurds, edited by Gunter, Michael, 5969. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gunes, Cengiz. 2017. “Turkey’s New Left.” New Left Review 107 (September–October): 930.Google Scholar
Gunes, Cengiz. 2013. “Accommodating Kurdish Demands in Turkey.” In The Challenge of Non-Territorial Autonomy: Theory and Case Studies, edited by Nimni, Ephraim, Osipov, Alexander, and Smith, David, 7184. Bern: Peter Lang International Publishers.Google Scholar
Gunes, Cengiz. 2012. Kurdish National Movement in Turkey: From Protest to Resistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gunes, Cengiz, and Gürer, Çetin. 2018. “Kurdish Movement’s Democratic Autonomy Proposals in Turkey.” In Democratic Representation in Plurinational States: The Kurds in Turkey, edited by Nimni, Ephraim and Aktoprak, Elçin, 159175. London: Plagrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Gunes, Cengiz, and Lowe, Robert. 2015. “The Impact of the Syrian War on Kurdish Politics Across the Middle East.” London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Gurses, Mehmet. 2018. Anatomy of a Civil War: Sociopolitical Impacts of the Kurdish Conflict in Turkey. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Gürer, Çetin. 2015. Demokratik Özerklik: Bir Yurttaşlık Heterotopyası. Ankara: Notabene.Google Scholar
Hannum, Hurst. 2005. “Territorial Autonomy: Permanent Solution or Step Toward Secession.” Beyond a One-Dimensional State: An Emerging Right to Autonomy, edited by Skurbaty, Zelim A., 153160. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Happel, Klaus. 2006. “Introduction.” In Prison Writings: The Roots of Civilisation, by Abdullah øcalan. Translated by Klaus Happel. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
HDP. 2015. Büyük İnsanlık-Bizler Meclise. Ankara.Google Scholar
Joshua Project. 2017. “Assyrian.” https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/10464.htlm. (Accessed October 5, 2017.)Google Scholar
KCK. 2005. KCK Sözleşmesi (KCK Contract). https://code.google.com/p/bookstorer/downloads/detail?name=KCK%20S%C3%B6zle%C5%9Fmesi.pdf. (Accessed June 1, 2017.)Google Scholar
Kincaid, John. 2011. “Editor’s Introduction: Federalism as a Mode of Governance.” In Federalism (Volume 1), edited by Kincaid, John, xxixxxv. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Knapp, Michael, and Jongerden, Joost. 2014. “Communal Democracy: The Social Contract and Confederalism in Rojava.” Comparative Islamic Studies 10 (1): 87109.Google Scholar
Knapp, Michael, Flach, Anja, and Ayboga, Ercan. 2016. Revolution in Rojava: Democratic Autonomy and Women’s Liberation in Syrian Kurdistan. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
KRG. 2018. “Fact Sheet: About the Kurdistan Regional Government.” http://cabinet.gov.krd/p/p.aspx?l=12&p=180.htlm. (Accessed January 4, 2018.)Google Scholar
KRI. 2009. “Draft Constitution of Kurdistan Region – Iraq.” https://collections.lib.utah.edu/details?id=318869. (Accessed January 9, 2018.)Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2007. “National Cultural Autonomy and International Minority Rights Norms.” Ethnopolitics 6 (3): 379393.Google Scholar
Lapidoth, Ruth. 1997. Autonomy: Flexible Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Leezenberg, Michiel. 2016. “The Ambiguities of Democratic Autonomy: The Kurdish Movement in Turkey and Rojava.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (4): 671690.Google Scholar
Malloy, Tove H. 2015. “Introduction.” In Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-territorial Autonomy, edited by Malloy, Tove H. and Palermo, Francesco, 19. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malloy, Tove H., Osipov, Alexander, and Vizi, Balázs, eds. 2015. Managing Diversity Through Non-Territorial Autonomy: Assessing Advantages, Deficiencies, and Risks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malloy, Tove H., and Palermo, Francesco, eds. 2015. Minorities and Territory: Rethinking Autonomy as Strategy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDowall, David. 2004. A Modern History of the Kurds. London: I.B.Tauris.Google Scholar
McGarry, John, and O’Leary, Brendan. 2009. “Must Pluri-national Federations Fail?Ethnopolitics 8 (1): 525.Google Scholar
McGarry, John, O’Leary, Brendan, and Simeon, Richard. 2008. “Integration or Accommodation? The Enduring Debate in Conflict Regulation.” In Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation, edited by Choudhry, Sujit, 4190. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGarry, John, and O’Leary, Brendan. 2005. “Federation as a Method of Ethnic Conflict Regulation.” In From Power Sharing to Democracy: Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies, edited by Noel, Sid, 263296. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Middle East Eye. 2016. “Syrian Kurds declare new federation in bid for recognition.” http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/kurdish-pyd-declares-federalism-northern-syria-1311505605.htlm. (Accessed September 25, 2017.)Google Scholar
Nimni, Ephraim. 2015. “Minorities and the Limits of Liberal Democracy: Demoicracy and Non-Territorial Autonomy.” In Minorities and Territory: Rethinking Autonomy as Strategy, edited by Malloy, Tove H. and Palermo, Francesco, 5782. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nimni, Ephraim. 2005. “Introduction: The National Cultural Autonomy Model Revisited.” In National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics, edited by Nimni, Ephraim, 114. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nimni, Ephraim, Smith, David, and Osipov, Alexander, eds. 2013. The Challenge of Non-Territorial Autonomy: Theory and Case Studies. Bern: Peter Lang International Publishers.Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, Dylan. 2018. “Conflict in Kirkuk: A Comparative Perspective of Cross-regional Self-determination Disputes.” Ethnopolitics 17 (1): 3754.Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, Dylan. 2017. “Autonomy Impaired: Centralisation, Authoritarianism and the Failing Iraqi State.” Ethnopolitics 16(4): 315332.Google Scholar
O’Leary, Brendan. 2005. “Power-Sharing, Pluralist Federation, and Federacy.” In The Future of Kurdistan in Iraq, edited by Brendan, O’Leary, McGarry, John, and Salih, Khaled, 5791. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Öcalan, Abdullah. 2015. Demokratik Uygarlık Çözümü. Istanbul: Amara Yayıncılık.Google Scholar
Öcalan, Abdullah. 2004. Bir Halkı Savunmak. Cologne: Weşanên Serxwebûn.Google Scholar
Packer, John. 2005. “Autonomy and the Effective Participation of Minorities in Public Life: Developments in the OSCE.” In Beyond a One-Dimensional State: An Emerging Right to Autonomy, edited by Skurbaty, Zelim A., 321336. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Palermo, Francesco. 2015. “Owned or Shared? Territorial Autonomy in the Minority Discourse.” In Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-territorial Autonomy, edited by Malloy, Tove H. and Palermo, Francesco, 1332. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
PKK. 2009. Kürt Sorununda Çözüme Doǧru Demokratik Özerklik. Abdullah Öcalan Sosyal Bilimler Akademisi Yayınları (Place not stated).Google Scholar
PKK. 2007a. “Demokratik Özerklik ve Özerk Demokratik Kürdistan.” Serxwebûn 312: 2127.Google Scholar
PKK. 2007b. “Demokratik Özerklik.” Serxwebûn 301: 5558.Google Scholar
PKK. 2005. “Demokratik Konfederalizm Devletsiz Özgürlükcü ve Demokratik Yaşamdır.” Serxwebûn 280: 2024.Google Scholar
PKK. 2004. 21. Yüzyılın Mücadele Çizgisi Olarak Meşru Savunma Stratejisi. Cologne: Weşanên Serxwebûn.Google Scholar
Romano, David. 2014. “The Iraqi Kurdish View on Federalism: Not Just for the Kurds.” In Conflict, Democratization and the Kurds in the Middle East: Turkey, Iran, Iraq and Syria, edited by Romano, David and Gurses, Mehmet, 189209. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Romano, David. 2010. “Iraqi Kurdistan: Challenges to Autonomy in the Wake of US Withdrawal.” International Affairs 86 (6): 13451359.Google Scholar
Romano, David and Gurses, Mehmet. 2014. “The Kurds as Barrier or Key to Democratization.” In Conflict, Democratization and the Kurds in the Middle East: Turkey, Iran, Iraq and Syria, edited by Romano, David and Gurses, Mehmet, 114. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Said, Rodi. 2017. “Syrians Vote in Kurdish-led Regions of North.” Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-kurds/syrians-vote-in-kurdish-led-regions-of-north-idUSKCN1BX1PY.htlm. (Accessed October 10, 2017.)Google Scholar
Skurbaty, Zelim A. 2005. “Is there an Emerging Right to Autonomy? Summary Reflections, Conclusions and Recommendations.” In Beyond a One-Dimensional State: An Emerging Right to Autonomy, edited by Skurbaty, Zelim A., 565568. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Smith, David. 2013. “Non-territorial Autonomy and Political Community in Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 12 (1): 2755.Google Scholar
Stansfield, Gareth. 2003. Iraqi Kurdistan: Political Developments and Emergent Democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stansfield, Gareth, and Ahmadzadeh, Hashem. 2008. “Kurdish or Kurdistanis? Conceptualising Regionalism in the North of Iraq.” In An Iraq of Its Regions: Cornerstones of a Federal Democracy?, edited by Visser, Reidar and Gareth, Stansfield, 123150. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Suksi, Markku. 2015. “Non-Territorial Autonomy: The Meaning of ‘(Non-)Territoriality.” In Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-territorial Autonomy, edited by Malloy, Tove H. and Palermo, Francesco, 83115. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tejel, Jordi. 2009. Syria’s Kurds: History, Politics and Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Welhengama, Gnanapala. 2017. Minorities’ Claims: From Autonomy to Secession: International Law and State Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolff, Stefan. 2010. “Governing (in) Kirkuk: resolving the status of a disputed territory in post-American Iraq.” International Affairs 86 (6): 13611379.Google Scholar
Vanly, Ismet Sheriff. 1993. “Kurdistan in Iraq.” In A People Without A Country: The Kurds and Kurdistan, edited by Chaliand, Gerard, 139193. New York: Olive Branch Press.Google Scholar
Voller, Yaniv. 2014. The Kurdish Liberation Movement in Iraq: From Insurgency to Statehood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar