Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T22:17:55.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RETHINKING EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2021

Adrian Pabst
Adrian Pabst*
Affiliation:
NIESR, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author. Email: a.pabst@niesr.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much of public policy-making has in recent decades been driven by the idea of evidence-based policy – policy rooted in the principles of social science and, more specifically, empirical validation based on social and behavioural science. This article argues that evidence-based policy, while helping to improve the design of policies aimed at changing individual behaviour, lacks a recognition that individual and group choices are embedded in social relationships and institutions. There is a risk of over-relying not only on probabilistic models that under-state our condition of ‘radical uncertainty’ but also on data and metrics that are disconnected from the everyday experience of workers and citizens whose needs and interests cannot always be measured or managed. Since uncertainty is a fundamental reality of both the economy and social life, policy-making needs robust conceptual narratives to make sense of numbers and provide a sound basis on which to make decisions allied to ethical judgements.

Keywords

evidence-based policyprobabilistic modelsuncertaintyjudgementD81D91H83
Type
Notes and Contributions
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 255: NEW DIRECTIONS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND POLICY IDEAS , February 2021 , pp. 85 - 91
Copyright
© National Institute Economic Review 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A. (2012), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. and Shiller, R. (2009), Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, D. (2006), ‘Recession looms for the U.S. economy in 2007’, CEPR, November 2006, https://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/forecast_2006_11.pdf.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2008), Does Ethics Have a Chance in a World of Consumers? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairney, P. (2016), The Politics of Evidence-Based Policymaking, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Collier, P. and Kay, J. (2020), Greed Is Dead: Politics After Individualism, London: Allan Lane.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2015), GDP: A Brief But Affectionate History, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2020a), Markets, State, and People. Economics for Public Policy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2020b), ‘Economists must collaborate courageously’, Nature, 582, p. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, B. (1992), In Defence of Politics, 4th ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N.M. et al. (2020), ‘Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand’, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, 16 March, https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2020-03-16-COVID19-Report-9.pdf.Google Scholar
Gill, J. and Meier, K.J. (2000), ‘Public administration research and practice: A methodological manifesto’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 1, pp. 157–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D.P. and Shapiro, I. (1994), Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, S., Lourenço, J., Paton, R., Ghafari, M., Kraemer, M., Thompson, C, Simmonds, P. and Klenerman, P. (2020), ‘Fundamental principles of epidemic spread highlight the immediate need for large-scale serological surveys to assess the stage of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic’, medRxiv (26 March), https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.24.20042291Google Scholar
Haldane, A.G. and May, R.M. (2011), ‘Systemic risk in banking ecosystems’, Nature, 469, pp. 351–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haldane, A.G. (2020), ‘To set coronavirus policy, model lives and livelihoods in lockstep’, Nature, 581, p. 357.Google ScholarPubMed
Halpern, D. (2009), The Hidden Wealth of Nations, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, A. (2020), ‘Time series models for epidemics: Leading indicators, control groups and policy assessment’, NIESR Discussion Paper 517, 19th October 2020, available online at https://www.niesr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publications/NIESR%20DP%20517.pdf.Google Scholar
Haynes, L., Service, O., Goldacre, B. and Torgerson, D. (2012), ‘Test, learn, adapt: Developing public policy with randomised controlled trials’, London: Cabinet Office, available online at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/62529/TLA-1906126.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C.J. and Lynn, L.E. Jr. (2004), ‘Governance and public management, an introduction’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 1, pp. 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M. and Kay, J. (2020), Radical Uncertainty: Decision-Making for an Unknowable Future, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Küçük, H., Lenoël, C. and Macqueen, R. (2020), ‘Prospects for the UK economy’, National Institute Economic Review, 254, pp. 4–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, M. (2020), The New Class War. Saving Democracy from the Metropolitan Elite, London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2013), Ruling the Void: The Hollowing-Out of Western Democracy, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Meier, K.J. (1997), ‘Bureaucracy and democracy: The case for more bureaucracy and less democracy’, Public Administration Review, 57, 3, pp. 193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounk, Y. (2018), The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J.Z. (2019), The Tyranny of Metrics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, J. and Tanner, W. (2019), The Politics of Belonging, London: Onward, available online at https://www.ukonward.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Politics-of-Belonging-Deck-v.4.pdf.Google Scholar
Pabst, A. (2019), The Demons of Liberal Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pilling, D. (2018), The Growth Delusion: The Wealth and Well-Being of Nations, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Rajan, R.G. (2005), ‘Has financial development made the world riskier?’, NBER Working Paper 11728, November 2005, https://www.nber.org/papers/w11728.Google Scholar
Rajan, R.G. (2019), The Third Pillar. The Revival of Community in a Polarised World, London: William Collins.Google Scholar
Sandbu, M. (2020), The Economics of Belonging: A Radical Plan to Win Back the Left Behind and Achieve Prosperity for All, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smolin, L. (2006), The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thorp, E.O. and Kassouf, S.T. (1967), Beat the Market: A Scientific Stock Market System Hardcover, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Weatherall, J.O. (2014), The Physics of Wall Street: A Brief History of Predicting the Unpredictable, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar