Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:35:53.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regular actions of simple algebraic groups on projective threefolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this note is to study regular actions of simple algebraic groups on projective threefolds as an application of the theory of algebraic threefolds, especially Mori Theory and the theory of Fano threefolds (cf. Mori [11], Iskovskih [7, 8]). The motivation for this study is as follows. In a series of papers, Umemura, in part jointly with Mukai, has classified maximal connected algebraic subgroups of the Cremona group of three variables and also constructed minimal rational threefolds which correspond to such subgroups (cf. Umemura [16-19], Mukai-Ume-mura [12]). In particular, Umemura and Mukai studied in [12] the SL(2, C)-equivariant smooth projectivization of SL(2, C)/G, where G is a binary icosahedral or octahedral subgroup of SL(2, C). The study of equivariant smooth projectivization of SL(2, C)/G for any finite subgroup G has been completed along their lines in Nakano [14]. The main trick of these studies is the investigation of equivariant contraction maps of extremal rays in the context of Mori Theory [11]. In this note, we apply a similar idea to projective threefolds with a regular action of a simple algebraic group and determine which simple algebraic groups can act regularly and nontrivially on projective threefolds and in which fashion. We also need some standard (but difficult) facts from the theory of Fano threefolds. For the precise statement, see Theorem 1 in the main text. For the proof of this theorem, we need a classification of closed subgroups of simple algebraic groups of codimension 1 and 2, which could be derived easily from the classical work of Dynkin [4]. However, we shall give a geometric proof independent of [4] which leads up directly to the proof of Theorem 1. On the whole, we shall establish by geometric methods the scarcity of closed subgroups of small codimension in simple algebraic groups, which is implied in Dynkin [4].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1989

References

[1] Bialynicki-Birula, A., Some theorems on actions of algebraic groups, Ann. of Math., 98 (1973), 480497.Google Scholar
[2] Blichfeldt, H. F., Finite collineation groups, The University of Chicago press, Chicago, 1917.Google Scholar
[3] Clemens, C. H. and Griffiths, P. H., The intermediate jacobian of the cubic threefold, Ann. of Math., 95 (1972), 281356.Google Scholar
[4] Dynkin, E. B., Maximal subgroups of the classical groups, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 6 (1957), 245378.Google Scholar
[5] Hironaka, H., Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of characteristic 0, Ann. of Math., 79 (1964), I: 109203, II: 205326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Hochschild, P., Basic Theory of Algebraic Groups and Lie Algebras, GTM, 75, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin, 1981.Google Scholar
[7] Iskovskih, V. A., Fano 3-folds. I, Math. USSR Izvestija, 11 (1977) No. 3, 485527.Google Scholar
[8] Iskovskih, V. A., Fano 3-folds. II, Math. USSR Izvestija, 12 (1978) No. 3, 469506.Google Scholar
[9] Kobayashi, S. and Ochiai, T., Compact homogeneous complex manifolds with positive tangent bundle, Differential Geometry in honor of K. Yano, Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 1972, 221232.Google Scholar
[10] Mabuchi, T., On the classification of essentially effective SL(n, C)-actions on algebraic n-folds, Osaka J. Math., 16, No. 3 (1979), 745759.Google Scholar
[11] Mori, S., Threefolds whose canonical bundles are not numerically effective, Ann. of Math., 116 (1982), 133176.Google Scholar
[12] Mukai, S. and Umemura, H., Minimal Rational Threefolds, Lee. Notes in Math., 1016, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1983, 490518.Google Scholar
[13] Mumford, D. and Fogarty, J., Geometric Invariant Theory, A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1982 (Second Enlarged Edition).Google Scholar
[14] Nakano, T., On equivariant completions 3-dimensional homogeneous spaces of SL(2, C), to appear in Japanese J. of Math., Vol. 15, No. 2, 1989.Google Scholar
[15] Sumihiro, H., Equivariant completion II, J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 15-3 (1975), 573605.Google Scholar
[16] Umemura, H., Sur les sous-groupes algébriques primitifs du groupe de Cremona à Trois variables, Nagoya Math. J., 79 (1980), 4767.Google Scholar
[17] Umemura, H., Maximal algebraic subgroups of the Cremona group of three variables, Nagoya Math. J., 87 (1982), 5978.Google Scholar
[18] Umemura, H., On the maximal connected algebraic subgroups of the Cremona group II, Advanced Studies in Pure Math., 6 (1985), Algebraic Groups and Related Topics, 349436.Google Scholar
[19] Umemura, H., Minimal rational threefolds II, Nagoya Math. J., 110 (1988), 1580.Google Scholar
[20] Varadarajan, V. S., Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and their Representations, GTM 102, Springer-Verlag, New York ·Berlin·Heidelberg·Tokyo, 1984 (Springer Edition).Google Scholar