Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:41:20.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Origin of primary infections of grape by Uncinula necator: RAPD analysis discriminates two biotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1998

C. DÉLYE
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Intégrées sur la Vigne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, B.P. 81, 33883 Villenave d'Ornon cédex, France
M.-F. CORIO-COSTET
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Intégrées sur la Vigne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, B.P. 81, 33883 Villenave d'Ornon cédex, France
Get access

Abstract

Thirty-one clonal isolates of U. necator were taken from diseased grapes from three different vineyards in France and Germany. Samples were collected in April from typical ‘flagshoot’ symptoms, and in July and August from the same plants. The mating-type and the sensitivity to the fungicide triadimenol were determined for all isolates. Techniques for obtaining and characterizing isolates are described. Two isolates in the first sampling and eight in the second were resistant to triadimenol, with resistance factors ranging from 3·4 to 11·8. All isolates in the first sampling and nine out of the 21 isolates in the second were mating-type (+), the remaining isolates were mating-type (−). Genetic variation between all isolates was assessed using the RAPD technique. Phenetic analysis based on the 364 RAPD fragments obtained revealed two very distinct groups, one group containing nine out of the 10 isolates from the first sampling, the second group containing all the remaining isolates. Isolates clustered in the first group displayed 58 RAPD fragments specific to them. These isolates did not exhibit 60 RAPD fragments present in all other isolates. Molecular and biological data suggested that isolates clustering in the two groups represent two different biotypes of U. necator, which are likely to be genetically isolated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
The British Mycological Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)