Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:54:02.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of ectomycorrhiza identification based on morphotyping and PCR-RFLP analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2002

Stacey M. SAKAKIBARA
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Okanagan University College, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Melanie D. JONES
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Okanagan University College, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Michelle GILLESPIE
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Okanagan University College, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Shannon M. HAGERMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Okanagan University College, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Mary E. FORREST
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Okanagan University College, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Suzanne W. SIMARD
Affiliation:
Kamloops Forest Region, British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Kamloops, British Columbia, V2C 2T7, Canada.
Daniel M. DURALL
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Okanagan University College, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Get access

Abstract

Two methods are currently being used to describe ECM fungal communities associated with root tips: molecular techniques and morphological classification. Previous studies have found that these two approaches give conflicting results, with several fungal genotypes being identified from different ectomycorrhizas within the same morphotype. This has led researchers to question the usefulness of the morphological approach. The objective of this study was to compare the two approaches on ectomycorrhizas collected from three plant species growing in two different environments. Specifically, mycorrhizas were classified using a detailed morphological approach and then were subjected to PCR-RFLP analysis of the ITS region of the rRNA gene repeat. Ectomycorrhizas of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and paper birch (Betula papyrifera) were sampled from three widely dispersed sites with different soil types in the southern interior of British Columbia. Ectomycorrhizas of Douglas-fir and arbutoid mycorrhizas from Arctostaphylos uva-ursi were sampled from a fourth site in a different biogeoclimatic zone. For eight of eleven dominant morphotypes, one main RFLP banding pattern was observed. Ninety-three % of the mycorrhizas analyzed in these eight morphotypes would have been classified in the same way by either method. Five of the eight morphotypes were positively identified as Russula nigricans, Lactarius sp., Leccinum scabrum, Rhizopogon sect. Villosuli, and Thelephora terrestris by matching the RFLPs to those of fungal fruit bodies in our database or by sequencing the ITS region. The other morphotypes producing one dominant RFLP pattern were designated as Cenococcum, E-strain and Mycelium radicis atrovirens (MRA) based on their morphology. Morphotyping did not distinguish amongst major RFLP types for mycorrhizas classified as Amphinema-like, Piloderma-like and Rhizopogon-like A. We conclude that detailed morphological classification can be very useful as the primary method of ectomycorrhizal classification, when used in conjunction with molecular techniques. This approach will allow for an efficient use of research funds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The British Mycological Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)