Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:49:34.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aerodynamic diameter of conidia of Erynia neoaphidis and other entomophthoralean fungi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2002

Farhad HEMMATI
Affiliation:
Plant and Invertebrate Ecology Division IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AT, UK. Current address: AREEO, Scientific & Research Bureau, PO Box 19835-111, Tehran, Iran.
Judith K. PELL
Affiliation:
Plant and Invertebrate Ecology Division IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
H. Alastair McCARTNEY
Affiliation:
Plant Pathogen Interactions Division, IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
Michael L. DEADMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AT, UK. Current address: Department of Crop Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, PO Box 34, Al Khod 123, Sultanate of Oman.
Get access

Abstract

The aerodynamic diameter, da, of conidia produced in vivo and in vitro by the entomopathogenic fungus Erynia neoaphidis were estimated using an impaction method. The estimated values of da for conidia produced in vivo were smaller than those produced in vitro: in vivo the values of da for primary and secondary conidia were between 16 and 18 μm (equivalent fall speed, Vs, 0·8–1·0 cm s−1); for in vitro produced conidia da values were between 28 and 31 μm (Vs, 2·4–3 cm s−1). For conidia produced by field collected cadavers the value of da, was estimated to be similar to that for conidia produced in vivo in the laboratory. The aerodynamic diameter of primary conidia of Conidiobolus obscurus (strain X39) and Zoophthora radicans (strain NW250) produced in vivo were also measured using the same method. The values of da for these two species were 45 and 17 μm (Vs, 6·2 and 0·9 cm s−1) respectively. Implications for dispersal of E. neoaphidis are discussed. The physical diameters of the test spores were measured microscopically and compared with the aerodynamic diameters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The British Mycological Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)