Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:07:42.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Xps Study of Oxygen Adsorption on (3X3) Reconstructed MBE Grown GaN Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R. A. Beach
Affiliation:
Sr. Laboratories of Applied Physics 128-95, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
E. C. Piquette
Affiliation:
Sr. Laboratories of Applied Physics 128-95, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
T. C. McGill
Affiliation:
Sr. Laboratories of Applied Physics 128-95, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
T. J. Watson
Affiliation:
Sr. Laboratories of Applied Physics 128-95, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
Get access

Abstract

The incorporation of oxygen onto the (3x3) reconstructed surface of GaN(0001) has been studied using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). It was found that the (3x3) reconstruction corresponds to a fractional Ga adlayer atop a Ga terminated GaN surface. Our measurements indicate a surface coverage of 1.15 ± 0.2 monolayers of relaxed Ga on the surface. The binding energy separation between the relaxed surface Ga3d core level and bulk Ga3d level was measured to be 1.1 ± 0.1 eV. A metallic component extending from the bulk GaN valence band maximum out to 0 eV was also present in the XPS spectrum. The separation between the bulk valence band maximum and the Fermi level of the metallic component was found to be 2.1 ± 0. 1 eV. The relaxation of the surface Ga was found to decrease with oxygen exposure indicating Ga-O bonding, with oxygen adsorption terminating at 1.3 ± 0.2 monolayers. The Ols core level was found to have a FWHM of 2.0 ± 0.1 eV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Wu, C.I. and Kahn, A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16(4) 2218 (1998)Google Scholar
[2] Bermudez, V.M., J. Appl. Phys. 80 (2) 1190 (1996)Google Scholar
[3] Smith, A.R., Feenstra, R.M., Greve, D.W., Neugebauer, J., and Northrup, J.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (20)3934 (1997)Google Scholar
[4] Seah, M.P. and Dench, W.A., Surf. Int. Anal. 1, 2 (1979)Google Scholar
[5] Sung, M.M., Ahn, I., Bykov, V., and Rabalais, J.W., Phys. Rev. B 54(20) 14652 (1996)Google Scholar
[6] Xu, Y.N. and Ching, W.Y., Phys. Rev. B 48, 4335 (1993)Google Scholar
[7] Seelmann-Eggebert, M., Weyher, J. L., Obloh, H., Zimmermann, H., Rar, A., and Porowski, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2635 (1997).Google Scholar
[8] Physical Electronics, Multipak Operator's Manual, (1996)Google Scholar