Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:23:25.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wheelmade or Wheel-Finished? Interpretation of ‘Wheelmarks’ on Pottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Robert C. Henrickson*
Affiliation:
Conservation Analytical Laboratory, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
Get access

Abstract

Analysis of patterns of breakage and xeroradiographs have shown that ‘wheelmarks’ provide an incomplete and potentially misleading diagnostic for forming methods. The location and distribution of such marks over the entire vessel is crucial. Patterns of breakage reveal the characteristic patterns of weakness in the vessel fabric left by each type of forming method. Examination of both the overall patterns and surfaces of breaks in relation to the vessel profile aids reconstruction of the original forming process. Selective xeroradiography aid this interpretation. Despite the ubiquity and extent of ‘wheelmarks’ on Godin III painted buff ware vessels (bowls and closed shapes), patterns of breakage and xeroradiography demonstrate limited but persistent use of true throwing of small vessels on a potter's wheel (western Iran, 2600-1400 B.C.). All others were built using combinations of hand-forming methods and finished on a tournette.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Balfet, H., in The Many Dimensions of Pottery, edited by Leeuw, S.E. van der and Pritchard, A.C. (Cingula VII, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1984), pp. 171198.Google Scholar
[2] Bourriau, J., in Ancient Technology to Modern Science, edited by Kingery, W.D. (Ceramics and Civilization I, American Ceramic Society, Columbus, 1984), pp. 2742.Google Scholar
[3] Franken, H., Excavations at Tell Deir Alla, I (Brill, Leiden 1969).Google Scholar
[4] Franken, H., In Search of the Jericho Potters (Amsterdam, 1974).Google Scholar
[5] H. Franken and Kalsbeek, J., Potters of a Medieval Village in the Jordan Valley (Amsterdam, 1975).Google Scholar
[6] Glanzman, W., MASCA Journal 2(6), 163169 (1983).Google Scholar
[7] Clanzman, W. and Fleming, S. J., MASCA Journal 3(4), 114121 (1985).Google Scholar
[8] Guner, G., Anadolu'da Yasammakta Olan Ilkel Comlekcilik (Ak Yayinlari Kultur Serisi, Akbank, Istanbul, 1988).Google Scholar
[9] Henrickson, Robert C., in Technology and Style, edited by Kingery, D. (Ceramics and Civilization II, American Ceramic Society, Columbus, 1986) pp. 5385.Google Scholar
[10] Robert Henrickson, C., Iran XXIV, 155 (1986).Google Scholar
[11] Robert Henrickson, C., Iranica Antiqua XXII, 33115 (1987).Google Scholar
[12] Henrickson, Robert C., in Proceedings of the 26th International Archaeometry Symposium, edited by Farquhar, R.M., Hancock, R.G.V., and Pavlish, L.A.. (Archaeometry Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 1988), pp. 4347.Google Scholar
[13] Henrickson, Robert C., in Cross-Craft and Cross-Cultural Interaction in Ceramics, edited by Notis, M. R. and McGovern, P. E. (Ceramics and Civilization IV, 541 American Ceramic Society, Columbus, 1989), pp. 81146.Google Scholar
[14] Johnston, R., in Material Culture; Styles, Organization. and Dynamics of Technology, edited by H. Lechtman and R. S. Merrill (1975 Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society, 1977), pp. 169210 Google Scholar
[15] Krause, R. A., in The Many Dimensions of Pottery, edited by van, S.E. dor Leeuw and Pritchard, A.C. (Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1984), pp. 617697.Google Scholar
[16] Krause, R. A., The Clay Sleeps (University of Alabama, University, 1985).Google Scholar
[17] Peacock, D.P.S., Pottery in the Roman World: An Ethnoarchaeological (Longman, London, 1982).Google Scholar
[18] Reina, R. E. and Hill, R. M., II, The Traditional Pottery of Guatemala (University of Texas, Austin, 1978).Google Scholar
[19] Rice, P. M., Pottery Analysis; A Sourcebook (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987).Google Scholar
[20] Rye, O. S., Pottery Technology: Principles and Reconstruction (Washington: Taraxacum, 1981).Google Scholar
[21] Rye, O. S. and Evans, C., Traditional Pottery Techniques of Pakistan: Field and Laboratory Studies (Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, 21, Washington, 1976).Google Scholar
[22] Shepard, A. O., Ceramics for the Archaeolosist (Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, 1965).Google Scholar
[23] As, A. van, in The Many Dimensions of Pottery, edited by Leouw, S.E. van der and Pritchard, A.C. (Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1984), pp. 131164.Google Scholar
[24] As, A. van, in Pottery Technology: Ideas and Approaches, edited by Bronitsky, G. (Westview, Boulder, 1989), pp. 4179.Google Scholar
[25] Leeuw, S. E. van der, in Ex Horreo, edited by Beek, B.L. van, Brandt, R.W., Waateringe, W. Groenmen-van (Cingula IV, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1977), pp. 6876.Google Scholar
[26] Leeuw, S. E. van der, in Production andDistribution: A Ceramic Viewpoint, edited by Howard, H. and Morris, E.. (British Archaeological Reports, International Series 120, Oxford, 1981), Pp. 361386 Google Scholar
[27] Leeuw, S. E. van der, in The Many Dimensions of Pottery, edited by Leeuw, S.E. van der and Pritchard, A.C. (Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1984), pp. 707773.Google Scholar
[28] Vandiver, P. B., Archaeomaterials 2(2), 139174 (1988).Google Scholar
[29] Voyatzoglu, M., in East Cretan White-on-Dark Ware, edited by Betancourt, P. P. (University Museum Monograph 51, University Museum, Philadelphia, 1984), pp. 130142.Google Scholar
[30] Young, T. C. Jr., and Levine, L. D., Excavations of the Godin Project: Second Progress Report (Art and Archaeology Occasional Paper 26, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, 1974).Google Scholar